在公共领域认证佛教:拉达克的道德对话

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Rohit Singh
{"title":"在公共领域认证佛教:拉达克的道德对话","authors":"Rohit Singh","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4031013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the partition between India and Pakistan in 1947, the residents of Leh, Ladakh became citizens of the Indian nation-state and residents of Jammu and Kashmir.  Partition introduced Buddhists in the region to what Dipesh Chakrabarty refers to a political modernity: “rule by modern institutions of the state, bureaucracy, and capitalist enterprise…”(Chakrabarty 2000, 4).  In response to the new prospects, promises, and possibilities of Ladakh’s political modernity, political leaders and religious reform group have attempted to mobilized local Buddhists around a common core sense of Ladakhi Buddhist identity.  These dynamic have engendered a variety of debates and dialogues in the public sphere over what it means to be a good Buddhist and what local practices and traditions constitute bad Buddhism.","PeriodicalId":37110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Buddhism","volume":"21 1","pages":"171-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authenticating Buddhism in the Public Sphere: Moral Dialogues in Ladakh\",\"authors\":\"Rohit Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.4031013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the partition between India and Pakistan in 1947, the residents of Leh, Ladakh became citizens of the Indian nation-state and residents of Jammu and Kashmir.  Partition introduced Buddhists in the region to what Dipesh Chakrabarty refers to a political modernity: “rule by modern institutions of the state, bureaucracy, and capitalist enterprise…”(Chakrabarty 2000, 4).  In response to the new prospects, promises, and possibilities of Ladakh’s political modernity, political leaders and religious reform group have attempted to mobilized local Buddhists around a common core sense of Ladakhi Buddhist identity.  These dynamic have engendered a variety of debates and dialogues in the public sphere over what it means to be a good Buddhist and what local practices and traditions constitute bad Buddhism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Buddhism\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"171-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Buddhism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4031013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Buddhism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4031013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1947年印度和巴基斯坦分治后,拉达克莱赫的居民成为印度民族国家的公民和查谟和克什米尔的居民。分治将该地区的佛教徒引入了迪佩什·查克拉巴蒂所说的政治现代性:“由现代国家机构、官僚机构和资本主义企业统治……”(查克拉巴蒂,2000年,4)。为了应对拉达克政治现代化的新前景、新承诺和新可能性,政治领导人和宗教改革团体试图围绕拉达克佛教身份的共同核心意识动员当地佛教徒。这些动态在公共领域引发了各种各样的辩论和对话,讨论什么是好佛教徒,什么是当地的习俗和传统构成了坏佛教。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Authenticating Buddhism in the Public Sphere: Moral Dialogues in Ladakh
Following the partition between India and Pakistan in 1947, the residents of Leh, Ladakh became citizens of the Indian nation-state and residents of Jammu and Kashmir.  Partition introduced Buddhists in the region to what Dipesh Chakrabarty refers to a political modernity: “rule by modern institutions of the state, bureaucracy, and capitalist enterprise…”(Chakrabarty 2000, 4).  In response to the new prospects, promises, and possibilities of Ladakh’s political modernity, political leaders and religious reform group have attempted to mobilized local Buddhists around a common core sense of Ladakhi Buddhist identity.  These dynamic have engendered a variety of debates and dialogues in the public sphere over what it means to be a good Buddhist and what local practices and traditions constitute bad Buddhism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Buddhism
Journal of Global Buddhism Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信