影响易位渔民释放后运动的因素:对易位成功的影响

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
J. Lewis, P. J. Happe, K. Jenkins, David J. Manson
{"title":"影响易位渔民释放后运动的因素:对易位成功的影响","authors":"J. Lewis, P. J. Happe, K. Jenkins, David J. Manson","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-21-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long distance, post-release movements of translocated wildlife can be a key factor limiting translocation success.  Yet, for many species, we have little or no understanding of factors that influence post-release movements.  Translocations have been important for recovering fisher Pekania pennanti populations across the southern portion of their North American range.  However, little is known about the post-release movements of translocated fishers and how these movements may be influenced by demographic or translocation-process factors.  To restore fishers in Washington State, we moved 90 fishers from central British Columbia and released them at nine sites in the Olympic Fisher Recovery Area on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington from 2008 to 2010. We evaluated post-release movements of 48 fishers to determine both the distance and duration of movements prior to home range establishment.  Fishers moved extensively following their release.  Multi-model selection indicated a high level of support for the hypothesis that post-release movements differed by fisher sex and age; whereas, year of release had no apparent effect on movements, and release date had only a marginal influence on male movements.  Mean distance (± 95% CI) from a release site to a home range was greater for adult males (62.0 ± 19.6 km) than for juvenile males (31.4 ± 16.0 km), adult females (30.9 ± 21.1 km), and juvenile females (29.0 ± 13.5 km).  Mean number of days from release until home range establishment was similar for the sexes, however the variance in movement duration was greater for females.  Twenty-six of 27 females established home ranges over an 11-month period (December-October), while 19 of 21 males did so within a 4-month period (April-July).  Mean home range sizes differed between males (128.3 ± 21.1 km2) and females (63.5 ± 9.0 km2) and were among the largest reported for the species.  A greater proportion of females (18 of 27; 67%) than males (8 of 21; 38%) established home ranges within or partially within the recovery area.  Six females left a previously established home range during the breeding season, presumably to find breeding males.  Given the large distances that fishers can move following release, translocation success could be furthered by releasing individuals at fewer sites in the interior of large reintroduction areas to facilitate greater exposure to a recovery area and greater opportunity to interact with conspecifics and potential mates.","PeriodicalId":49036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing the Post-Release Movements of Translocated Fishers: Implications for Translocation Success\",\"authors\":\"J. Lewis, P. J. Happe, K. Jenkins, David J. Manson\",\"doi\":\"10.3996/jfwm-21-023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Long distance, post-release movements of translocated wildlife can be a key factor limiting translocation success.  Yet, for many species, we have little or no understanding of factors that influence post-release movements.  Translocations have been important for recovering fisher Pekania pennanti populations across the southern portion of their North American range.  However, little is known about the post-release movements of translocated fishers and how these movements may be influenced by demographic or translocation-process factors.  To restore fishers in Washington State, we moved 90 fishers from central British Columbia and released them at nine sites in the Olympic Fisher Recovery Area on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington from 2008 to 2010. We evaluated post-release movements of 48 fishers to determine both the distance and duration of movements prior to home range establishment.  Fishers moved extensively following their release.  Multi-model selection indicated a high level of support for the hypothesis that post-release movements differed by fisher sex and age; whereas, year of release had no apparent effect on movements, and release date had only a marginal influence on male movements.  Mean distance (± 95% CI) from a release site to a home range was greater for adult males (62.0 ± 19.6 km) than for juvenile males (31.4 ± 16.0 km), adult females (30.9 ± 21.1 km), and juvenile females (29.0 ± 13.5 km).  Mean number of days from release until home range establishment was similar for the sexes, however the variance in movement duration was greater for females.  Twenty-six of 27 females established home ranges over an 11-month period (December-October), while 19 of 21 males did so within a 4-month period (April-July).  Mean home range sizes differed between males (128.3 ± 21.1 km2) and females (63.5 ± 9.0 km2) and were among the largest reported for the species.  A greater proportion of females (18 of 27; 67%) than males (8 of 21; 38%) established home ranges within or partially within the recovery area.  Six females left a previously established home range during the breeding season, presumably to find breeding males.  Given the large distances that fishers can move following release, translocation success could be furthered by releasing individuals at fewer sites in the interior of large reintroduction areas to facilitate greater exposure to a recovery area and greater opportunity to interact with conspecifics and potential mates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-21-023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-21-023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迁移野生动物的长距离、释放后迁移可能是限制迁移成功的关键因素。然而,对于许多物种来说,我们很少或根本不了解影响释放后迁移的因素。易位对于在其北美活动范围的南部恢复渔民佩卡尼亚的种群是重要的。然而,人们对迁移渔民释放后的迁移以及这些迁移如何受到人口或迁移过程因素的影响知之甚少。为了恢复华盛顿州的渔民,我们从不列颠哥伦比亚省中部转移了90条渔民,并在2008年至2010年期间将它们放归华盛顿奥林匹克半岛奥林匹克渔民恢复区的九个地点。我们评估了48名渔民的释放后运动,以确定在建立家园范围之前的运动距离和持续时间。他们被释放后,渔民们四处迁移。多模型选择结果表明,放生后的动作因性别和年龄的不同而不同,这一假设得到了高度的支持;而释放年份对动作无明显影响,释放日期对雄性动作仅有边际影响。从释放点到家的平均距离(±95% CI),成年雄性(62.0±19.6 km)大于幼年雄性(31.4±16.0 km)、成年雌性(30.9±21.1 km)和幼年雌性(29.0±13.5 km)。从释放到建立家庭范围的平均天数在性别上是相似的,但是在运动时间上女性的差异更大。27只雌性中有26只在11个月(12月至10月)期间建立了家园,而21只雄性中有19只在4个月(4月至7月)期间建立了家园。雄性(128.3±21.1 km2)和雌性(63.5±9.0 km2)的平均活动范围不同,是该物种中最大的。女性比例更高(27人中有18人;67%)高于男性(21人中有8人;38%)在恢复区内或部分恢复区内建立了家庭活动范围。六只雌性在繁殖季节离开了先前建立的家园,大概是为了寻找繁殖的雄性。考虑到渔民在放生后可以移动很远的距离,通过在大型放生区的内部更少的地点放生个体,以促进更多的接触恢复区域,并有更多的机会与同种物种和潜在配偶互动,可以进一步促进迁移的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing the Post-Release Movements of Translocated Fishers: Implications for Translocation Success
Long distance, post-release movements of translocated wildlife can be a key factor limiting translocation success.  Yet, for many species, we have little or no understanding of factors that influence post-release movements.  Translocations have been important for recovering fisher Pekania pennanti populations across the southern portion of their North American range.  However, little is known about the post-release movements of translocated fishers and how these movements may be influenced by demographic or translocation-process factors.  To restore fishers in Washington State, we moved 90 fishers from central British Columbia and released them at nine sites in the Olympic Fisher Recovery Area on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington from 2008 to 2010. We evaluated post-release movements of 48 fishers to determine both the distance and duration of movements prior to home range establishment.  Fishers moved extensively following their release.  Multi-model selection indicated a high level of support for the hypothesis that post-release movements differed by fisher sex and age; whereas, year of release had no apparent effect on movements, and release date had only a marginal influence on male movements.  Mean distance (± 95% CI) from a release site to a home range was greater for adult males (62.0 ± 19.6 km) than for juvenile males (31.4 ± 16.0 km), adult females (30.9 ± 21.1 km), and juvenile females (29.0 ± 13.5 km).  Mean number of days from release until home range establishment was similar for the sexes, however the variance in movement duration was greater for females.  Twenty-six of 27 females established home ranges over an 11-month period (December-October), while 19 of 21 males did so within a 4-month period (April-July).  Mean home range sizes differed between males (128.3 ± 21.1 km2) and females (63.5 ± 9.0 km2) and were among the largest reported for the species.  A greater proportion of females (18 of 27; 67%) than males (8 of 21; 38%) established home ranges within or partially within the recovery area.  Six females left a previously established home range during the breeding season, presumably to find breeding males.  Given the large distances that fishers can move following release, translocation success could be furthered by releasing individuals at fewer sites in the interior of large reintroduction areas to facilitate greater exposure to a recovery area and greater opportunity to interact with conspecifics and potential mates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management encourages submission of original, high quality, English-language scientific papers on the practical application and integration of science to conservation and management of native North American fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats in the following categories: Articles, Notes, Surveys and Issues and Perspectives. Papers that do not relate directly to native North American fish, wildlife plants or their habitats may be considered if they highlight species that are closely related to, or conservation issues that are germane to, those in North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信