临床推理教学法

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. D. C. L. Jordi, Alicia Gómez
{"title":"临床推理教学法","authors":"M. D. C. L. Jordi, Alicia Gómez","doi":"10.2916/INTER.7.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical reasoning refers to a cognitive process that allows health professional establish diagnoses, decisions and define treatment plans. There are different conceptions about the clinical reasoning in the bibliography. The objective of this study is evaluating the available evidence in the literature on the clinical reasoning as a strategy for teaching, towards problem-solving, in the area of health. This review was conducted in the following databases: Timbo, SciELO, PubMed and Cochrane Library, without restrictions of year or type of study. The forms of reasoning are analyzed (analytical and not analytical) and a synthesis of tools and methodologies is presents as a didactic approach promote the student’s reasoning in the clinic practice. Learning is a constructive process that occurs when the teaching is useful and meaningful for the students and they are actively involved in the acquisition of their self-knowledge, relating what they are learning with knowledge and previous experiences. The conclusions certified that the different forms of reasoning contribute to final decisions that reach novice and expert, enabling to health professionals an effective process of clinical reasoning.","PeriodicalId":30963,"journal":{"name":"InterCambios Dilemas y Transiciones de la Educacion Superior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El razonamiento clínico con enfoque didáctico\",\"authors\":\"M. D. C. L. Jordi, Alicia Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.2916/INTER.7.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical reasoning refers to a cognitive process that allows health professional establish diagnoses, decisions and define treatment plans. There are different conceptions about the clinical reasoning in the bibliography. The objective of this study is evaluating the available evidence in the literature on the clinical reasoning as a strategy for teaching, towards problem-solving, in the area of health. This review was conducted in the following databases: Timbo, SciELO, PubMed and Cochrane Library, without restrictions of year or type of study. The forms of reasoning are analyzed (analytical and not analytical) and a synthesis of tools and methodologies is presents as a didactic approach promote the student’s reasoning in the clinic practice. Learning is a constructive process that occurs when the teaching is useful and meaningful for the students and they are actively involved in the acquisition of their self-knowledge, relating what they are learning with knowledge and previous experiences. The conclusions certified that the different forms of reasoning contribute to final decisions that reach novice and expert, enabling to health professionals an effective process of clinical reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"InterCambios Dilemas y Transiciones de la Educacion Superior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"InterCambios Dilemas y Transiciones de la Educacion Superior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2916/INTER.7.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterCambios Dilemas y Transiciones de la Educacion Superior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2916/INTER.7.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床推理是指卫生专业人员建立诊断、决策和确定治疗计划的认知过程。参考书目中对临床推理有不同的认识。本研究的目的是评估文献中关于临床推理作为卫生领域解决问题的教学策略的现有证据。本综述在下列数据库中进行:Timbo、SciELO、PubMed和Cochrane Library,没有年份或研究类型的限制。推理的形式被分析(分析和非分析)和工具和方法的综合是作为一种教学方法,促进学生在临床实践中的推理。学习是一个建设性的过程,当教学对学生有用和有意义时,学生积极地参与到自我知识的获取中,将他们所学的知识与知识和以前的经验联系起来。结论证明,不同形式的推理有助于新手和专家做出最终决定,使卫生专业人员能够有效地进行临床推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El razonamiento clínico con enfoque didáctico
Clinical reasoning refers to a cognitive process that allows health professional establish diagnoses, decisions and define treatment plans. There are different conceptions about the clinical reasoning in the bibliography. The objective of this study is evaluating the available evidence in the literature on the clinical reasoning as a strategy for teaching, towards problem-solving, in the area of health. This review was conducted in the following databases: Timbo, SciELO, PubMed and Cochrane Library, without restrictions of year or type of study. The forms of reasoning are analyzed (analytical and not analytical) and a synthesis of tools and methodologies is presents as a didactic approach promote the student’s reasoning in the clinic practice. Learning is a constructive process that occurs when the teaching is useful and meaningful for the students and they are actively involved in the acquisition of their self-knowledge, relating what they are learning with knowledge and previous experiences. The conclusions certified that the different forms of reasoning contribute to final decisions that reach novice and expert, enabling to health professionals an effective process of clinical reasoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信