存在真理与理性真理。列夫·舍斯托夫与埃德蒙·胡塞尔的哲学之争

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Xu Fenglin
{"title":"存在真理与理性真理。列夫·舍斯托夫与埃德蒙·胡塞尔的哲学之争","authors":"Xu Fenglin","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-117-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1928–1930 there were only four meetings between Lev Shestov and Edmund Husserl. Already the first meeting revealed a discrepancy in the interpretation of truth: for Husserl, the existence of an ideal object is independent of living re­ality, the real world occupies a subordinate position in relation to the ideal. Ac­cording to Shestov, timeless ideal entities are doomed to decay, although, choos­ing between the real and the reasonable, a person chooses the reasonable, but in the situation of the ultimate idea, they reveal their impotence. Further commu­nication between the two philosophers made it possible to touch upon the ques­tion of “coercion by the truth”, the power of reason, and the tasks of philosophy. Shestov’s controversy with Husserl expressed the opposition between rationalis­tic epistemology and existential philosophy. However, the differences between the thinkers on scientific and philosophical issues did not interfere with their per­sonal friendship. Husserl sees the irrational reality of life, but he believes that philosophy can and aims to overcome this chaos of the irrational; for Shestov, the task is not to reject the rational, but to criticize the notion of its omnipotence. The exchange of ideas between Shestov and Husserl was an important event in the history of philosophy in the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Existential Truth and Rational Truth. Philosophical Controversy between Lev Shestov and Edmund Husserl\",\"authors\":\"Xu Fenglin\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-117-127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1928–1930 there were only four meetings between Lev Shestov and Edmund Husserl. Already the first meeting revealed a discrepancy in the interpretation of truth: for Husserl, the existence of an ideal object is independent of living re­ality, the real world occupies a subordinate position in relation to the ideal. Ac­cording to Shestov, timeless ideal entities are doomed to decay, although, choos­ing between the real and the reasonable, a person chooses the reasonable, but in the situation of the ultimate idea, they reveal their impotence. Further commu­nication between the two philosophers made it possible to touch upon the ques­tion of “coercion by the truth”, the power of reason, and the tasks of philosophy. Shestov’s controversy with Husserl expressed the opposition between rationalis­tic epistemology and existential philosophy. However, the differences between the thinkers on scientific and philosophical issues did not interfere with their per­sonal friendship. Husserl sees the irrational reality of life, but he believes that philosophy can and aims to overcome this chaos of the irrational; for Shestov, the task is not to reject the rational, but to criticize the notion of its omnipotence. The exchange of ideas between Shestov and Husserl was an important event in the history of philosophy in the 20th century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-117-127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-117-127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1928-1930年,列夫·谢斯托夫和埃德蒙·胡塞尔之间只有四次会面。第一次会议已经揭示了对真理的解释上的差异:对胡塞尔来说,理想对象的存在独立于生活状态,现实世界相对于理想处于从属地位。谢斯托夫认为,永恒的理想实体注定会腐朽,尽管在真实和合理之间选择,一个人选择了合理,但在终极理念的情况下,它们暴露了自己的无能。两位哲学家之间的进一步交流使我们有可能触及“真理的胁迫”问题、理性的力量和哲学的任务。舍斯托夫与胡塞尔的论战,表达了理性主义认识论与存在主义哲学的对立。然而,两位思想家在科学和哲学问题上的分歧并没有影响他们的个人友谊。胡塞尔看到了生活的非理性现实,但他相信哲学能够并旨在克服这种非理性的混乱;对舍斯托夫来说,任务不是拒绝理性,而是批评其无所不能的概念。舍斯托夫与胡塞尔的思想交流是20世纪哲学史上的一个重要事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Existential Truth and Rational Truth. Philosophical Controversy between Lev Shestov and Edmund Husserl
In 1928–1930 there were only four meetings between Lev Shestov and Edmund Husserl. Already the first meeting revealed a discrepancy in the interpretation of truth: for Husserl, the existence of an ideal object is independent of living re­ality, the real world occupies a subordinate position in relation to the ideal. Ac­cording to Shestov, timeless ideal entities are doomed to decay, although, choos­ing between the real and the reasonable, a person chooses the reasonable, but in the situation of the ultimate idea, they reveal their impotence. Further commu­nication between the two philosophers made it possible to touch upon the ques­tion of “coercion by the truth”, the power of reason, and the tasks of philosophy. Shestov’s controversy with Husserl expressed the opposition between rationalis­tic epistemology and existential philosophy. However, the differences between the thinkers on scientific and philosophical issues did not interfere with their per­sonal friendship. Husserl sees the irrational reality of life, but he believes that philosophy can and aims to overcome this chaos of the irrational; for Shestov, the task is not to reject the rational, but to criticize the notion of its omnipotence. The exchange of ideas between Shestov and Husserl was an important event in the history of philosophy in the 20th century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信