{"title":"女诗人的未来:大规模的令人不安的维多利亚诗歌","authors":"A. Chapman","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2022.a900621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"190 6 Kaur’s use of “we” recalls Webster’s insistent use of the pronoun in her essays and dramatic monologues—and her tongue-in-cheek recommendation that poets use “we” instead of “I” to protect themselves from biographical reading practices (155). While Kaur may seem less concerned than Webster about the distance between poem and biography, in both poets’ work, “we” serves as a constant reminder of the co-presence of reader, poet, and poem.","PeriodicalId":40377,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Review-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Victorian Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"190 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poetess Futures: Unsettling Victorian Poetry at Scale\",\"authors\":\"A. Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vcr.2022.a900621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"190 6 Kaur’s use of “we” recalls Webster’s insistent use of the pronoun in her essays and dramatic monologues—and her tongue-in-cheek recommendation that poets use “we” instead of “I” to protect themselves from biographical reading practices (155). While Kaur may seem less concerned than Webster about the distance between poem and biography, in both poets’ work, “we” serves as a constant reminder of the co-presence of reader, poet, and poem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victorian Review-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Victorian Studies\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victorian Review-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Victorian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vcr.2022.a900621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Review-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Victorian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vcr.2022.a900621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Poetess Futures: Unsettling Victorian Poetry at Scale
190 6 Kaur’s use of “we” recalls Webster’s insistent use of the pronoun in her essays and dramatic monologues—and her tongue-in-cheek recommendation that poets use “we” instead of “I” to protect themselves from biographical reading practices (155). While Kaur may seem less concerned than Webster about the distance between poem and biography, in both poets’ work, “we” serves as a constant reminder of the co-presence of reader, poet, and poem.