{"title":"阴道pH值作为检测细菌性阴道病的护理点试验的应用","authors":"Shridevi Metgud, Spurthi Gangigute, S. Metgud","doi":"10.47799/pimr.1001.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n \n Background & objectives: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a Reproductive tract infection (RTI) among young sexually active women with high prevalence. It is associated with complications related to pregnancy and an increased risk of acquiring STDs. This poses a need for cost-effective detection of BV in low resource settings. Hence, we propose to study the utility of vaginal pH determination for the detection of BV. \n \n Material & Methods: This is a single center, 1 year cross-sectional study. Swabs were collected from 250 non-pregnant women attending the out-patient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with vaginal discharge as a predominant symptom with or without backache and abdominal pain. Vaginal pH determination, Gram stain, wet mount, Whiff test, and Amsel’s criteria were used for BV detection.\n \n Results: 250 study participants with vaginal discharge suggestive of BV were analyzed. Vaginal pH was significantly higher in women with BV with the mean pH being 6.2. Vaginal pH >4.5 had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 66% to detect BV. The Whiff test had the least sensitivity. Clue cells and Amsel’s criteria of ≥ 3 were significant for BV. A combination of pH and Whiff test performed better had high sensitivity and specificity.\n \n Conclusions: A combination of pH determination and the Whiff test serves as a low-cost alternative in resource-poor settings for detection of BV. Though Clue cells and Amsel’s criteria ≥ 3 were most sensitive and specific, they cannot be used in low resource settings. Vaginal pH alone can be used to detect BV in areas of low prevalence.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Vaginal pH as Point of Care Test for Detection of Bacterial Vaginosis\",\"authors\":\"Shridevi Metgud, Spurthi Gangigute, S. Metgud\",\"doi\":\"10.47799/pimr.1001.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract\\n \\n Background & objectives: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a Reproductive tract infection (RTI) among young sexually active women with high prevalence. It is associated with complications related to pregnancy and an increased risk of acquiring STDs. This poses a need for cost-effective detection of BV in low resource settings. Hence, we propose to study the utility of vaginal pH determination for the detection of BV. \\n \\n Material & Methods: This is a single center, 1 year cross-sectional study. Swabs were collected from 250 non-pregnant women attending the out-patient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with vaginal discharge as a predominant symptom with or without backache and abdominal pain. Vaginal pH determination, Gram stain, wet mount, Whiff test, and Amsel’s criteria were used for BV detection.\\n \\n Results: 250 study participants with vaginal discharge suggestive of BV were analyzed. Vaginal pH was significantly higher in women with BV with the mean pH being 6.2. Vaginal pH >4.5 had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 66% to detect BV. The Whiff test had the least sensitivity. Clue cells and Amsel’s criteria of ≥ 3 were significant for BV. A combination of pH and Whiff test performed better had high sensitivity and specificity.\\n \\n Conclusions: A combination of pH determination and the Whiff test serves as a low-cost alternative in resource-poor settings for detection of BV. Though Clue cells and Amsel’s criteria ≥ 3 were most sensitive and specific, they cannot be used in low resource settings. Vaginal pH alone can be used to detect BV in areas of low prevalence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives In Medical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives In Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1001.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1001.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utility of Vaginal pH as Point of Care Test for Detection of Bacterial Vaginosis
Abstract
Background & objectives: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a Reproductive tract infection (RTI) among young sexually active women with high prevalence. It is associated with complications related to pregnancy and an increased risk of acquiring STDs. This poses a need for cost-effective detection of BV in low resource settings. Hence, we propose to study the utility of vaginal pH determination for the detection of BV.
Material & Methods: This is a single center, 1 year cross-sectional study. Swabs were collected from 250 non-pregnant women attending the out-patient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with vaginal discharge as a predominant symptom with or without backache and abdominal pain. Vaginal pH determination, Gram stain, wet mount, Whiff test, and Amsel’s criteria were used for BV detection.
Results: 250 study participants with vaginal discharge suggestive of BV were analyzed. Vaginal pH was significantly higher in women with BV with the mean pH being 6.2. Vaginal pH >4.5 had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 66% to detect BV. The Whiff test had the least sensitivity. Clue cells and Amsel’s criteria of ≥ 3 were significant for BV. A combination of pH and Whiff test performed better had high sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions: A combination of pH determination and the Whiff test serves as a low-cost alternative in resource-poor settings for detection of BV. Though Clue cells and Amsel’s criteria ≥ 3 were most sensitive and specific, they cannot be used in low resource settings. Vaginal pH alone can be used to detect BV in areas of low prevalence.