其他期刊的摘要

D. Ram, B. Peretz
{"title":"其他期刊的摘要","authors":"D. Ram, B. Peretz","doi":"10.1177/0898756420964637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess children's reactions to the administration of local anaesthetic injection in the mandible and in the maxilla, and to study their sensation of pain after each type of injection. Methods: Twenty-six children between the ages of 4 to 6 (mean age 5center dot3 plus minus 0center dot7 years), and 34 children aged between 7 to 10 (mean age 8center dot1 plus minus 1 years,) who were undergoing dental treatment in a pediatric dental clinic, were selected for this study. A random crossover design was used. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive either maxillary infiltration or mandibular block on the first visit, and the remaining local anesthesia on the second visit. During the injection, the modified Behavioural Pain Scale, was used. It comprised the following parameters: a) facial display, b) arm/leg movements, c) torso movements, and d) crying. Immediately after administering the local anesthesia, children were asked to rate their feeling according to the Facial Affective Scale. Results: The children in each group responded positively to both techniques revealing that there was no difference in either one. Subjective and objec6e evaluation disclosed no difference when mandibular block was administered during the first or second visit. Regarding the objective evaluation, in all parameters, more children reacted positively during administration of mandibular block than during maxillary infiltration. Conclusion: a) mandibular block and maxillary infiltration are similarly accepted by children when first administered, and b) children may feel inconvenience or pain and react by crying, yet may report a positive feeling in general.","PeriodicalId":76303,"journal":{"name":"Paraplegia","volume":"4 1","pages":"57-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0898756420964637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstracts from other journals\",\"authors\":\"D. Ram, B. Peretz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0898756420964637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess children's reactions to the administration of local anaesthetic injection in the mandible and in the maxilla, and to study their sensation of pain after each type of injection. Methods: Twenty-six children between the ages of 4 to 6 (mean age 5center dot3 plus minus 0center dot7 years), and 34 children aged between 7 to 10 (mean age 8center dot1 plus minus 1 years,) who were undergoing dental treatment in a pediatric dental clinic, were selected for this study. A random crossover design was used. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive either maxillary infiltration or mandibular block on the first visit, and the remaining local anesthesia on the second visit. During the injection, the modified Behavioural Pain Scale, was used. It comprised the following parameters: a) facial display, b) arm/leg movements, c) torso movements, and d) crying. Immediately after administering the local anesthesia, children were asked to rate their feeling according to the Facial Affective Scale. Results: The children in each group responded positively to both techniques revealing that there was no difference in either one. Subjective and objec6e evaluation disclosed no difference when mandibular block was administered during the first or second visit. Regarding the objective evaluation, in all parameters, more children reacted positively during administration of mandibular block than during maxillary infiltration. Conclusion: a) mandibular block and maxillary infiltration are similarly accepted by children when first administered, and b) children may feel inconvenience or pain and react by crying, yet may report a positive feeling in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paraplegia\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"57-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0898756420964637\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paraplegia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0898756420964637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paraplegia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0898756420964637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估儿童对下颌骨和上颌骨局部麻醉注射的反应,并研究他们在每种注射后的疼痛感。方法:选择26名年龄在4岁至6岁之间(平均年龄5中心点3加0中心点7岁)的儿童和34名年龄在7岁至10岁(平均年龄8中心点1加1岁)的在儿科牙科诊所接受牙科治疗的儿童进行本研究。采用随机交叉设计。每个患者在第一次就诊时被随机分配接受上颌浸润或下颌阻滞,在第二次就诊时接受剩余的局部麻醉。在注射过程中,使用了改良的行为疼痛量表。它包括以下参数:a)面部显示,b)手臂/腿部运动,c)躯干运动,以及d)哭泣。在实施局部麻醉后,儿童被要求根据面部情感量表对他们的感觉进行评分。结果:每组的孩子对这两种技术都有积极的反应,表明这两种方法都没有差异。主观和客观评估显示,在第一次或第二次就诊期间进行下颌阻滞时没有差异。关于客观评估,在所有参数中,下颌块给药期间比上颌浸润期间反应积极的儿童更多。结论:a)首次给药时,儿童同样接受下颌阻滞和上颌浸润,b)儿童可能会感到不便或疼痛,并通过哭泣做出反应,但总体上可能会有积极的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstracts from other journals
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess children's reactions to the administration of local anaesthetic injection in the mandible and in the maxilla, and to study their sensation of pain after each type of injection. Methods: Twenty-six children between the ages of 4 to 6 (mean age 5center dot3 plus minus 0center dot7 years), and 34 children aged between 7 to 10 (mean age 8center dot1 plus minus 1 years,) who were undergoing dental treatment in a pediatric dental clinic, were selected for this study. A random crossover design was used. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive either maxillary infiltration or mandibular block on the first visit, and the remaining local anesthesia on the second visit. During the injection, the modified Behavioural Pain Scale, was used. It comprised the following parameters: a) facial display, b) arm/leg movements, c) torso movements, and d) crying. Immediately after administering the local anesthesia, children were asked to rate their feeling according to the Facial Affective Scale. Results: The children in each group responded positively to both techniques revealing that there was no difference in either one. Subjective and objec6e evaluation disclosed no difference when mandibular block was administered during the first or second visit. Regarding the objective evaluation, in all parameters, more children reacted positively during administration of mandibular block than during maxillary infiltration. Conclusion: a) mandibular block and maxillary infiltration are similarly accepted by children when first administered, and b) children may feel inconvenience or pain and react by crying, yet may report a positive feeling in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信