对加里·马库斯(Gary marcus)和欧内斯特·戴维斯(Ernest davis)《重启人工智能:构建我们可以信任的人工智能:为通用人工智能的创造做出贡献》一书的现象学回应

Q1 Social Sciences

Creativity Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.3846/cs.2023.16193

J. Trujillo

{"title":"对加里·马库斯(Gary marcus)和欧内斯特·戴维斯(Ernest davis)《重启人工智能:构建我们可以信任的人工智能:为通用人工智能的创造做出贡献》一书的现象学回应","authors":"J. Trujillo","doi":"10.3846/cs.2023.16193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marcus and Davis’s Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust (2019) describes the narrowness of current artificial intelligence, posits constituents of human intelligence it contends artificial intelligence (AI) must reproduce to achieve a general (broad) formulation, and envisages the contributions of general AI to human living. This article (1) reviews Marcus and Davis’s argument, (2) phenomenologically evaluates their interpretation of human intelligence, and (3) discloses the moral inconsistencies implied by their vision of the relation between general AI and human being. Transcendental and hermeneutic phenomenological perspectives are employed to address the range of phenomena the authors affiliate with human intelligence.","PeriodicalId":38085,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A PHENOMENOLOGICAL REPLY TO GARY MARCUS AND ERNEST DAVIS’S REBOOTING AI: BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WE CAN TRUST: CONTRIBUTING TO THE CREATION OF GENERAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"authors\":\"J. Trujillo\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/cs.2023.16193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marcus and Davis’s Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust (2019) describes the narrowness of current artificial intelligence, posits constituents of human intelligence it contends artificial intelligence (AI) must reproduce to achieve a general (broad) formulation, and envisages the contributions of general AI to human living. This article (1) reviews Marcus and Davis’s argument, (2) phenomenologically evaluates their interpretation of human intelligence, and (3) discloses the moral inconsistencies implied by their vision of the relation between general AI and human being. Transcendental and hermeneutic phenomenological perspectives are employed to address the range of phenomena the authors affiliate with human intelligence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creativity Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creativity Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.16193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.16193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Marcus和Davis的《重启人工智能：构建我们可以信任的人工智能》（2019）描述了当前人工智能的狭隘性，提出了人类智能的组成部分，认为人工智能必须复制才能实现通用（广泛）公式，并设想了通用人工智能对人类生活的贡献。本文（1）回顾了Marcus和Davis的论点，（2）现象学地评估了他们对人类智能的解释，（3）揭示了他们对一般人工智能与人类关系的看法所隐含的道德矛盾。超验和解释学现象学视角被用来处理作者与人类智慧相关的一系列现象。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A PHENOMENOLOGICAL REPLY TO GARY MARCUS AND ERNEST DAVIS’S REBOOTING AI: BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WE CAN TRUST: CONTRIBUTING TO THE CREATION OF GENERAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Marcus and Davis’s Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust (2019) describes the narrowness of current artificial intelligence, posits constituents of human intelligence it contends artificial intelligence (AI) must reproduce to achieve a general (broad) formulation, and envisages the contributions of general AI to human living. This article (1) reviews Marcus and Davis’s argument, (2) phenomenologically evaluates their interpretation of human intelligence, and (3) discloses the moral inconsistencies implied by their vision of the relation between general AI and human being. Transcendental and hermeneutic phenomenological perspectives are employed to address the range of phenomena the authors affiliate with human intelligence.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Creativity Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： Creativity Studies accepts original research articles with a focus on communication within the creative society. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars from diverse disciplines such as philosophy, sociology, history, political, communication and information sciences. Creativity Studies also publishes survey papers and descriptions of academic events in this area. The journal issues will be organized around different issues on creativity.