解决硕士咨询学生反馈接受性的补救干预措施

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI:10.1002/ceas.12216

Lena Salpietro, Madeline Clark, Victoria Kress, John Laux, Tanesha Walker

引用次数: 1

摘要

补习是一项重要的把关责任，但辅导员教育对学生补习的最佳方式缺乏共识。我们使用Q方法来探索28名在认可的大学项目中全职工作的咨询教育工作者的补救做法。出现了四个因素:正当程序、反思实践、补习课程和保持项目状态。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Remedial Interventions to Address Receptivity to Feedback in Master's-Level Counseling Students

Remediation is an essential gatekeeping responsibility, yet counselor education lacks consensus on the best way to approach student remediation. We used Q methodology to explore the remediation practices of 28 counselor educators employed full-time in accredited university programs. Four factors emerged: Due Process, Reflective Practice, Remedial Coursework, and Preserve Programmatic Status.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

38.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Counselor Education and Supervision is dedicated to publishing manuscripts concerned with research, theory development, or program applications related to counselor education and supervision. It is concerned with the preparation and supervision of counselors in agency or school settings, in colleges and universities or at local, state, or federal levels. This journal is the official publication of the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES), a member association of the American Counseling Association (ACA).