以同行评议为基础的教学计划,以研究生水平的论文写作教学为导向

Q4 Arts and Humanities
L. Colombo, Guadalupe Alvarez
{"title":"以同行评议为基础的教学计划,以研究生水平的论文写作教学为导向","authors":"L. Colombo, Guadalupe Alvarez","doi":"10.17081/EDUHUM.23.40.3995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This paper analyzes two writing initiatives based on peer review activities and oriented to the development of academic writing at the graduate level focusing on the opportunities and challenges that participants identified as related to the peer feedback activities. Method: Electronic questionnaires and face-to-face indepth interviews administered to 16 participants were analyzed. Results: The following themes were identified: a) access to different perspectives, b) feeling the company of others in the thesis-writing process, c) focus of feedback, d) time-related challenges, e) the use of technology, and f) the social relations dimension. Discussion y Conclusion: Studies like this one are necessary to promote a graduate writing pedagogy, much needed for the advancement of students ́ dissertations as well as degree completion.","PeriodicalId":30507,"journal":{"name":"Educacion y Humanismo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iniciativas didácticas basadas en la revisión entre pares y orientadas a la enseñanza-aprendizaje de la escritura de tesis a nivel de posgrado\",\"authors\":\"L. Colombo, Guadalupe Alvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.17081/EDUHUM.23.40.3995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This paper analyzes two writing initiatives based on peer review activities and oriented to the development of academic writing at the graduate level focusing on the opportunities and challenges that participants identified as related to the peer feedback activities. Method: Electronic questionnaires and face-to-face indepth interviews administered to 16 participants were analyzed. Results: The following themes were identified: a) access to different perspectives, b) feeling the company of others in the thesis-writing process, c) focus of feedback, d) time-related challenges, e) the use of technology, and f) the social relations dimension. Discussion y Conclusion: Studies like this one are necessary to promote a graduate writing pedagogy, much needed for the advancement of students ́ dissertations as well as degree completion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacion y Humanismo\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacion y Humanismo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17081/EDUHUM.23.40.3995\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion y Humanismo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17081/EDUHUM.23.40.3995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本文分析了两项基于同行评审活动的写作倡议,这两项倡议旨在发展研究生水平的学术写作,重点关注参与者认为与同行反馈活动有关的机遇和挑战。方法:对16名参与者进行电子问卷调查和面对面深入访谈。结果:确定了以下主题:a)获得不同的视角,b)在论文写作过程中感受他人的陪伴,c)关注反馈,d)与时间相关的挑战,e)技术的使用,以及f)社会关系维度。讨论结论:像这样的研究对于促进研究生写作教学法是必要的,这对于提高学生的学位论文和完成学位都是非常必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iniciativas didácticas basadas en la revisión entre pares y orientadas a la enseñanza-aprendizaje de la escritura de tesis a nivel de posgrado
Objective: This paper analyzes two writing initiatives based on peer review activities and oriented to the development of academic writing at the graduate level focusing on the opportunities and challenges that participants identified as related to the peer feedback activities. Method: Electronic questionnaires and face-to-face indepth interviews administered to 16 participants were analyzed. Results: The following themes were identified: a) access to different perspectives, b) feeling the company of others in the thesis-writing process, c) focus of feedback, d) time-related challenges, e) the use of technology, and f) the social relations dimension. Discussion y Conclusion: Studies like this one are necessary to promote a graduate writing pedagogy, much needed for the advancement of students ́ dissertations as well as degree completion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信