用于挪威卫生技术评估的登记数据——机遇和挑战

Q3 Medicine
G. Hagen, T. Wisløff
{"title":"用于挪威卫生技术评估的登记数据——机遇和挑战","authors":"G. Hagen, T. Wisløff","doi":"10.5324/nje.v29i1-2.4042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decisions on uptake of medicines and medical devices on health insurance schemes are increasingly based ona health technology assessment (HTA) process. In Norway, the process has included reimbursement of outpatientmedicines for two decades. During the past years, in-patient medicines, medical devices and morerecently vaccines are all included in the HTA system. In the present article, we outline the Norwegian HTAsystem including its central components and partners. HTA as a scientific approach puts evidence on efficacy,safety and value of interventions into a broader perspective, explicitly considering relevant factors, among theselegal, ethical and organisational aspects of the intervention. Although several combinations of aspects arepossible, the most common is an assessment of the relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of theintervention. Randomised controlled trials have long been considered the mainstay for assessment of clinicaleffectiveness pre-launch, while registry data have been used to inform safety post-lunch, by pharmacovigilance.Recently, we have seen a move towards more use of “real world evidence”, i.e. data from non-RCT sources,mainly from registries. A model-based approach is often used to assess cost-effectiveness, in this context,different types of evidence from different sources are often synthesized. In this paper we describe the centralcomponents of HTA with special emphasis on different observational data sources, such as the unique Norwegianhealth registries. We finally speculate on future directions for use of observational data in HTA, both in aglobal and Norwegian setting.","PeriodicalId":35548,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Epidemiologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Registry data for use in health technology assessments in Norway – Opportunities and challenges\",\"authors\":\"G. Hagen, T. Wisløff\",\"doi\":\"10.5324/nje.v29i1-2.4042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decisions on uptake of medicines and medical devices on health insurance schemes are increasingly based ona health technology assessment (HTA) process. In Norway, the process has included reimbursement of outpatientmedicines for two decades. During the past years, in-patient medicines, medical devices and morerecently vaccines are all included in the HTA system. In the present article, we outline the Norwegian HTAsystem including its central components and partners. HTA as a scientific approach puts evidence on efficacy,safety and value of interventions into a broader perspective, explicitly considering relevant factors, among theselegal, ethical and organisational aspects of the intervention. Although several combinations of aspects arepossible, the most common is an assessment of the relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of theintervention. Randomised controlled trials have long been considered the mainstay for assessment of clinicaleffectiveness pre-launch, while registry data have been used to inform safety post-lunch, by pharmacovigilance.Recently, we have seen a move towards more use of “real world evidence”, i.e. data from non-RCT sources,mainly from registries. A model-based approach is often used to assess cost-effectiveness, in this context,different types of evidence from different sources are often synthesized. In this paper we describe the centralcomponents of HTA with special emphasis on different observational data sources, such as the unique Norwegianhealth registries. We finally speculate on future directions for use of observational data in HTA, both in aglobal and Norwegian setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norsk Epidemiologi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norsk Epidemiologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v29i1-2.4042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Epidemiologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v29i1-2.4042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保险计划中药物和医疗器械的使用决策越来越多地基于健康技术评估(HTA)过程。在挪威,这一过程已经包括了20年的门诊医疗费用报销。在过去的几年里,住院药品、医疗器械和最近的疫苗都被纳入HTA系统。在本文中,我们概述了挪威HTAsystem,包括其核心组成部分和合作伙伴。HTA作为一种科学方法,将干预措施的有效性、安全性和价值的证据放在更广阔的视野中,明确考虑干预措施的法律、伦理和组织方面的相关因素。尽管有几个方面的组合是可能的,但最常见的是对干预的相对有效性和成本效益的评估。长期以来,随机对照试验一直被认为是启动前评估临床有效性的支柱,而注册数据已被药物警戒用于午餐后的安全性。最近,我们看到越来越多地使用“真实世界证据”,即来自非随机对照试验来源的数据,主要来自登记处。通常使用基于模型的方法来评估成本效益,在这种情况下,通常会综合来自不同来源的不同类型的证据。在本文中,我们描述了HTA的中心组成部分,特别强调了不同的观测数据来源,例如独特的挪威健康登记处。最后,我们推测了HTA中观测数据的未来使用方向,包括在阿格洛巴尔和挪威环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Registry data for use in health technology assessments in Norway – Opportunities and challenges
Decisions on uptake of medicines and medical devices on health insurance schemes are increasingly based ona health technology assessment (HTA) process. In Norway, the process has included reimbursement of outpatientmedicines for two decades. During the past years, in-patient medicines, medical devices and morerecently vaccines are all included in the HTA system. In the present article, we outline the Norwegian HTAsystem including its central components and partners. HTA as a scientific approach puts evidence on efficacy,safety and value of interventions into a broader perspective, explicitly considering relevant factors, among theselegal, ethical and organisational aspects of the intervention. Although several combinations of aspects arepossible, the most common is an assessment of the relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of theintervention. Randomised controlled trials have long been considered the mainstay for assessment of clinicaleffectiveness pre-launch, while registry data have been used to inform safety post-lunch, by pharmacovigilance.Recently, we have seen a move towards more use of “real world evidence”, i.e. data from non-RCT sources,mainly from registries. A model-based approach is often used to assess cost-effectiveness, in this context,different types of evidence from different sources are often synthesized. In this paper we describe the centralcomponents of HTA with special emphasis on different observational data sources, such as the unique Norwegianhealth registries. We finally speculate on future directions for use of observational data in HTA, both in aglobal and Norwegian setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Norsk Epidemiologi
Norsk Epidemiologi Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信