在突出位置激励人们:政治支持网络、关系能量和员工创新实施

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Travis J. Grosser, Christopher M. Sterling, Rohit S. Piplani
{"title":"在突出位置激励人们:政治支持网络、关系能量和员工创新实施","authors":"Travis J. Grosser,&nbsp;Christopher M. Sterling,&nbsp;Rohit S. Piplani","doi":"10.1002/job.2734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Although affect is a factor likely to impact the success of innovation, little research has been done on the relationship between affect and innovation implementation performance (i.e., an employee's ability to successfully implement innovative ideas and practices). We address this oversight by adopting a social network approach to examine relational energy (i.e., how energized one person is when interacting with another) as a form of high-activation positive affect likely to influence innovation implementation. We test our hypotheses using a sample of employees in a pharmaceutical research firm (Study 1). Our results indicate that the number of people an employee goes to for political support who report being energized by that employee is positively related to innovation implementation performance. In contrast, the number of people an employee seeks out for political support who are not energized by that employee has negative implications for innovation implementation performance. The average network centrality of an individual's energized network contacts also relates to implementation performance, with this effect being stronger for employees not in a managerial position. A scenario-based experiment (Study 2) provides support for the causal linkage between feeling energized by a co-worker and one's willingness to provide instrumental help to the co-worker.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"44 8","pages":"1145-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energized people in prominent places: Political support networks, relational energy, and employee innovation implementation\",\"authors\":\"Travis J. Grosser,&nbsp;Christopher M. Sterling,&nbsp;Rohit S. Piplani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/job.2734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Although affect is a factor likely to impact the success of innovation, little research has been done on the relationship between affect and innovation implementation performance (i.e., an employee's ability to successfully implement innovative ideas and practices). We address this oversight by adopting a social network approach to examine relational energy (i.e., how energized one person is when interacting with another) as a form of high-activation positive affect likely to influence innovation implementation. We test our hypotheses using a sample of employees in a pharmaceutical research firm (Study 1). Our results indicate that the number of people an employee goes to for political support who report being energized by that employee is positively related to innovation implementation performance. In contrast, the number of people an employee seeks out for political support who are not energized by that employee has negative implications for innovation implementation performance. The average network centrality of an individual's energized network contacts also relates to implementation performance, with this effect being stronger for employees not in a managerial position. A scenario-based experiment (Study 2) provides support for the causal linkage between feeling energized by a co-worker and one's willingness to provide instrumental help to the co-worker.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"volume\":\"44 8\",\"pages\":\"1145-1163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2734\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然情感是一个可能影响创新成功的因素,但关于情感与创新实施绩效(即员工成功实施创新理念和实践的能力)之间关系的研究很少。我们通过采用社会网络方法来检查关系能量(即,一个人在与另一个人互动时的能量)作为一种可能影响创新实施的高激活积极影响的形式来解决这一疏忽。我们使用一家制药研究公司的员工样本来检验我们的假设(研究1)。我们的结果表明,一名员工寻求政治支持、并报告受到该员工激励的人数与创新实施绩效呈正相关。相比之下,员工寻求政治支持却不被该员工激励的人数对创新实施绩效有负面影响。个人活跃的网络联系人的平均网络中心性也与执行绩效有关,对于非管理职位的员工,这种影响更强。一个基于场景的实验(研究2)为同事激励的感觉与一个人愿意为同事提供工具性帮助之间的因果联系提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energized people in prominent places: Political support networks, relational energy, and employee innovation implementation

Although affect is a factor likely to impact the success of innovation, little research has been done on the relationship between affect and innovation implementation performance (i.e., an employee's ability to successfully implement innovative ideas and practices). We address this oversight by adopting a social network approach to examine relational energy (i.e., how energized one person is when interacting with another) as a form of high-activation positive affect likely to influence innovation implementation. We test our hypotheses using a sample of employees in a pharmaceutical research firm (Study 1). Our results indicate that the number of people an employee goes to for political support who report being energized by that employee is positively related to innovation implementation performance. In contrast, the number of people an employee seeks out for political support who are not energized by that employee has negative implications for innovation implementation performance. The average network centrality of an individual's energized network contacts also relates to implementation performance, with this effect being stronger for employees not in a managerial position. A scenario-based experiment (Study 2) provides support for the causal linkage between feeling energized by a co-worker and one's willingness to provide instrumental help to the co-worker.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信