小肠和多脏器移植中关闭腹壁的技术:系统综述

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Allana C Fortunato, Rafael S Pinheiro, Cal S Matsumoto, Rubens M Arantes, Vinicius Rocha-Santos, Lucas S Nacif, Daniel R Waisberg, Liliana Ducatti, Rodrigo B Martino, Luiz Carneiro-D'Albuquerque, Wellington Andraus
{"title":"小肠和多脏器移植中关闭腹壁的技术:系统综述","authors":"Allana C Fortunato, Rafael S Pinheiro, Cal S Matsumoto, Rubens M Arantes, Vinicius Rocha-Santos, Lucas S Nacif, Daniel R Waisberg, Liliana Ducatti, Rodrigo B Martino, Luiz Carneiro-D'Albuquerque, Wellington Andraus","doi":"10.12659/AOT.934595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Short bowel syndrome is the most common etiology of intestinal failure, resulting from either resections of different intestinal segments or a congenital condition. Due to the absence or considerable reduction of intestinal loops in the abdominal cavity, patients with short bowel syndrome present with atrophy and muscle retraction of the abdominal wall, which leads to loss of abdominal domain and elasticity. This complication is an aggravating factor of intestinal transplantation since it can prevent the primary closure of the abdominal wall. A vast array of surgical techniques to overcome the challenges of the complexity of the abdominal wall have been described in the literature. The aim of our study was to review the modalities of abdominal wall closure in intestinal/multivisceral transplantation. Our study consisted of a systematic review following the methodological instructions described in the PRISMA guidelines. Duplicate studies and studies that did not meet the criteria for the systematic review were excluded, especially those without relevance and an explicit relationship with the investigated theme. After this step, 63 articles were included in our study. The results obtained with these techniques have been encouraging, but a high incidence of wound complications in some reports has raised concerns. There is no consensus among transplantation centers regarding which technique would be ideal and with higher success rates and lower rates of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"27 1","pages":"e934595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techniques for Closing the Abdominal Wall in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Allana C Fortunato, Rafael S Pinheiro, Cal S Matsumoto, Rubens M Arantes, Vinicius Rocha-Santos, Lucas S Nacif, Daniel R Waisberg, Liliana Ducatti, Rodrigo B Martino, Luiz Carneiro-D'Albuquerque, Wellington Andraus\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/AOT.934595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Short bowel syndrome is the most common etiology of intestinal failure, resulting from either resections of different intestinal segments or a congenital condition. Due to the absence or considerable reduction of intestinal loops in the abdominal cavity, patients with short bowel syndrome present with atrophy and muscle retraction of the abdominal wall, which leads to loss of abdominal domain and elasticity. This complication is an aggravating factor of intestinal transplantation since it can prevent the primary closure of the abdominal wall. A vast array of surgical techniques to overcome the challenges of the complexity of the abdominal wall have been described in the literature. The aim of our study was to review the modalities of abdominal wall closure in intestinal/multivisceral transplantation. Our study consisted of a systematic review following the methodological instructions described in the PRISMA guidelines. Duplicate studies and studies that did not meet the criteria for the systematic review were excluded, especially those without relevance and an explicit relationship with the investigated theme. After this step, 63 articles were included in our study. The results obtained with these techniques have been encouraging, but a high incidence of wound complications in some reports has raised concerns. There is no consensus among transplantation centers regarding which technique would be ideal and with higher success rates and lower rates of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"e934595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.934595\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.934595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

短肠综合征是肠衰竭最常见的病因,由不同肠段切除或先天性疾病引起。由于腹腔内肠袢缺失或大量减少,短肠综合征患者出现腹壁萎缩和肌肉收缩,导致腹腔面积和弹性丧失。这种并发症是肠移植的一个加重因素,因为它可以阻止腹壁的初级闭合。大量的外科技术,以克服腹壁的复杂性的挑战,已在文献中描述。本研究的目的是回顾肠/多脏器移植中腹壁闭合的方式。我们的研究包括遵循PRISMA指南中方法说明的系统评价。重复研究和不符合系统评价标准的研究被排除在外,特别是那些与研究主题没有相关性和明确关系的研究。经过这一步,我们的研究纳入了63篇文章。使用这些技术获得的结果令人鼓舞,但在一些报道中,伤口并发症的高发生率引起了人们的关注。移植中心对于哪种技术更理想、成功率更高、并发症发生率更低尚无共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techniques for Closing the Abdominal Wall in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Short bowel syndrome is the most common etiology of intestinal failure, resulting from either resections of different intestinal segments or a congenital condition. Due to the absence or considerable reduction of intestinal loops in the abdominal cavity, patients with short bowel syndrome present with atrophy and muscle retraction of the abdominal wall, which leads to loss of abdominal domain and elasticity. This complication is an aggravating factor of intestinal transplantation since it can prevent the primary closure of the abdominal wall. A vast array of surgical techniques to overcome the challenges of the complexity of the abdominal wall have been described in the literature. The aim of our study was to review the modalities of abdominal wall closure in intestinal/multivisceral transplantation. Our study consisted of a systematic review following the methodological instructions described in the PRISMA guidelines. Duplicate studies and studies that did not meet the criteria for the systematic review were excluded, especially those without relevance and an explicit relationship with the investigated theme. After this step, 63 articles were included in our study. The results obtained with these techniques have been encouraging, but a high incidence of wound complications in some reports has raised concerns. There is no consensus among transplantation centers regarding which technique would be ideal and with higher success rates and lower rates of complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信