亚热带巴西大西洋森林的生物多样性与森林碳汇没有关系

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kauane Maiara Bordin , Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert , Joice Klipel , Rayana Caroline Picolotto , Rodrigo Scarton Bergamin , Ana Carolina da Silva , Pedro Higuchi , Elivane Salete Capellesso , Márcia Cristina Mendes Marques , Alexandre F. Souza , Sandra Cristina Müller
{"title":"亚热带巴西大西洋森林的生物多样性与森林碳汇没有关系","authors":"Kauane Maiara Bordin ,&nbsp;Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert ,&nbsp;Joice Klipel ,&nbsp;Rayana Caroline Picolotto ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Scarton Bergamin ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina da Silva ,&nbsp;Pedro Higuchi ,&nbsp;Elivane Salete Capellesso ,&nbsp;Márcia Cristina Mendes Marques ,&nbsp;Alexandre F. Souza ,&nbsp;Sandra Cristina Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Brazilian Atlantic Forest (BAF) is a global biodiversity hotspot, but its carbon sink capacity, especially in the subtropical portion, is poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between biodiversity measures (i.e., taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity) and net carbon change across subtropical BAF, testing whether there is a win–win situation in the conservation of biodiversity and carbon sink capacity across forests of distinct ages. We obtained the net carbon change from 55 permanent plots, from early successional to old-growth forests, by combining the carbon gains and losses across two censuses. We found that subtropical BAF are on average acting as a carbon sink, but carbon gains and losses varied a lot across plots, especially within late successional/old-growth forests. The carbon sink was consistent across different forest ages, and we did not find a relationship between biodiversity and net carbon change in subtropical BAF. Therefore, conservation programs should aim at both targets in order to maximize the protection of biodiversity and carbon capture across the secondary and old-growth subtropical BAF, especially in a scenario of global changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"21 2","pages":"Pages 112-120"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No relationship between biodiversity and forest carbon sink across the subtropical Brazilian Atlantic Forest\",\"authors\":\"Kauane Maiara Bordin ,&nbsp;Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert ,&nbsp;Joice Klipel ,&nbsp;Rayana Caroline Picolotto ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Scarton Bergamin ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina da Silva ,&nbsp;Pedro Higuchi ,&nbsp;Elivane Salete Capellesso ,&nbsp;Márcia Cristina Mendes Marques ,&nbsp;Alexandre F. Souza ,&nbsp;Sandra Cristina Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Brazilian Atlantic Forest (BAF) is a global biodiversity hotspot, but its carbon sink capacity, especially in the subtropical portion, is poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between biodiversity measures (i.e., taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity) and net carbon change across subtropical BAF, testing whether there is a win–win situation in the conservation of biodiversity and carbon sink capacity across forests of distinct ages. We obtained the net carbon change from 55 permanent plots, from early successional to old-growth forests, by combining the carbon gains and losses across two censuses. We found that subtropical BAF are on average acting as a carbon sink, but carbon gains and losses varied a lot across plots, especially within late successional/old-growth forests. The carbon sink was consistent across different forest ages, and we did not find a relationship between biodiversity and net carbon change in subtropical BAF. Therefore, conservation programs should aim at both targets in order to maximize the protection of biodiversity and carbon capture across the secondary and old-growth subtropical BAF, especially in a scenario of global changes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 112-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000068\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

巴西大西洋森林(BAF)是全球生物多样性的热点地区,但其碳汇能力,特别是亚热带部分的碳汇能力尚不清楚。我们旨在评估亚热带BAF的生物多样性措施(即分类、功能和系统发育多样性)与净碳变化之间的关系,以检验不同年龄的森林在生物多样性保护和碳汇能力方面是否存在双赢局面。通过结合两次普查的碳收益和损失,我们获得了55个永久样地的净碳变化,从早期演替森林到原始森林。研究发现,亚热带BAF平均起着碳汇的作用,但不同样地的碳损益差异很大,尤其是在晚演替/原生林内。不同林龄的森林碳汇是一致的,我们没有发现亚热带BAF生物多样性与净碳变化的关系。因此,保护计划应同时针对这两个目标,以最大限度地保护次生和原始亚热带BAF的生物多样性和碳捕获,特别是在全球变化的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

No relationship between biodiversity and forest carbon sink across the subtropical Brazilian Atlantic Forest

No relationship between biodiversity and forest carbon sink across the subtropical Brazilian Atlantic Forest

The Brazilian Atlantic Forest (BAF) is a global biodiversity hotspot, but its carbon sink capacity, especially in the subtropical portion, is poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between biodiversity measures (i.e., taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity) and net carbon change across subtropical BAF, testing whether there is a win–win situation in the conservation of biodiversity and carbon sink capacity across forests of distinct ages. We obtained the net carbon change from 55 permanent plots, from early successional to old-growth forests, by combining the carbon gains and losses across two censuses. We found that subtropical BAF are on average acting as a carbon sink, but carbon gains and losses varied a lot across plots, especially within late successional/old-growth forests. The carbon sink was consistent across different forest ages, and we did not find a relationship between biodiversity and net carbon change in subtropical BAF. Therefore, conservation programs should aim at both targets in order to maximize the protection of biodiversity and carbon capture across the secondary and old-growth subtropical BAF, especially in a scenario of global changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信