书评:英语历史上的礼貌:从中世纪到现在

Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.1177/00754242211005831
Jonathan Culpeper
{"title":"书评:英语历史上的礼貌:从中世纪到现在","authors":"Jonathan Culpeper","doi":"10.1177/00754242211005831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Politeness in the history of English is certainly not the first book to be written in that topic area. 2018 saw the publication of Keith Thomas’s much lauded In pursuit of civility: anners and civilization in early modern England. But that is a book written by a historian for people interested in history. The inescapable fact is that politeness, and related notions such as “civility” and “manners,” is mainly constituted in language. This is the first monograph written by a linguist focusing on the language of politeness in the history of English. To be sure, linguists have written papers on the language of English politeness in particular texts, genres, and periods, but this is the first work to encompass the broad sweep from its beginnings in the Middle Ages through to the present day. That in itself is a huge challenge, which partly explains why nobody has done it before. Seven of the ten chapters, diachronically organized, survey the development of politeness in Britain. Jucker uses a journey metaphor, specifically an “extended road trip,” to explain how he handles breadth and depth: he journeys through time, stopping to take pictures, “both close-ups of interesting details and longshot panoramas of entire sceneries” (xi). Parts of that road have been travelled by other scholars, who also have taken pictures. These pictures/studies are judiciously used, often with updatings and new framings, to fill in any gaps in Jucker’s own many studies. It would be a mistake to think that this is simply a descriptive work. Popular theories and frameworks of linguistic politeness, developed in pragmatics and interactional linguistics, are not able to provide an adequate account of how politeness works in all periods. The first chapter provides a succinct theoretical overview and sharp critique of extant work. The general approach taken by the book is a mixed one, combining both a first-order approach (i.e., one that focuses on what non-academic users do and their understandings) in the examination of politeness vocabulary and discourses on politeness, and a second-order approach (i.e., one that focuses on what academic observers do and their concepts) in theorizing about, for example, conceptualizations of politeness (e.g., the notions of “negative politeness” and “positive politeness”). Regarding the latter, the book contains some important innovations, as I will note below. 1005831 ENGXXX10.1177/00754242211005831Journal of English LinguisticsBook Review book-review2021","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00754242211005831","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Culpeper\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00754242211005831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Politeness in the history of English is certainly not the first book to be written in that topic area. 2018 saw the publication of Keith Thomas’s much lauded In pursuit of civility: anners and civilization in early modern England. But that is a book written by a historian for people interested in history. The inescapable fact is that politeness, and related notions such as “civility” and “manners,” is mainly constituted in language. This is the first monograph written by a linguist focusing on the language of politeness in the history of English. To be sure, linguists have written papers on the language of English politeness in particular texts, genres, and periods, but this is the first work to encompass the broad sweep from its beginnings in the Middle Ages through to the present day. That in itself is a huge challenge, which partly explains why nobody has done it before. Seven of the ten chapters, diachronically organized, survey the development of politeness in Britain. Jucker uses a journey metaphor, specifically an “extended road trip,” to explain how he handles breadth and depth: he journeys through time, stopping to take pictures, “both close-ups of interesting details and longshot panoramas of entire sceneries” (xi). Parts of that road have been travelled by other scholars, who also have taken pictures. These pictures/studies are judiciously used, often with updatings and new framings, to fill in any gaps in Jucker’s own many studies. It would be a mistake to think that this is simply a descriptive work. Popular theories and frameworks of linguistic politeness, developed in pragmatics and interactional linguistics, are not able to provide an adequate account of how politeness works in all periods. The first chapter provides a succinct theoretical overview and sharp critique of extant work. The general approach taken by the book is a mixed one, combining both a first-order approach (i.e., one that focuses on what non-academic users do and their understandings) in the examination of politeness vocabulary and discourses on politeness, and a second-order approach (i.e., one that focuses on what academic observers do and their concepts) in theorizing about, for example, conceptualizations of politeness (e.g., the notions of “negative politeness” and “positive politeness”). Regarding the latter, the book contains some important innovations, as I will note below. 1005831 ENGXXX10.1177/00754242211005831Journal of English LinguisticsBook Review book-review2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00754242211005831\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242211005831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242211005831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《英语史上的礼貌》当然不是第一本关于这个主题的书。2018年,基思·托马斯出版了备受赞誉的《追求文明:近代早期英国的礼仪与文明》。但那是一本由历史学家为对历史感兴趣的人写的书。不可回避的事实是,礼貌以及与之相关的“文明”、“礼貌”等概念主要是由语言构成的。这是英语历史上第一部由语言学家撰写的关于礼貌语言的专著。诚然,语言学家已经就特定文本、体裁和时期的英语礼貌语言写过论文,但这是第一部涵盖从中世纪开始一直到今天的广泛内容的著作。这本身就是一个巨大的挑战,这在一定程度上解释了为什么以前没有人这样做。十章中的七章,按时间顺序组织,调查了礼貌在英国的发展。朱克用一个旅行的比喻,特别是一个“延伸的公路旅行”,来解释他如何处理广度和深度:他在时间中旅行,停下来拍照,“既有有趣细节的特写,也有整个风景的长镜头全景”(xi)。这条路的一部分已经被其他学者旅行过,他们也拍过照片。这些图片/研究被明智地使用,经常更新和新的框架,以填补朱克自己的许多研究中的任何空白。如果认为这仅仅是一部描述性的作品,那就错了。在语用学和互动语言学中发展起来的关于语言礼貌的流行理论和框架,并不能充分说明礼貌在所有时期是如何起作用的。第一章提供了一个简洁的理论概述和对现有工作的尖锐批评。本书采用的一般方法是混合方法,结合了一阶方法(即,关注非学术用户在礼貌词汇和礼貌话语中的行为和理解)和二阶方法(即,关注学术观察者的行为和他们的概念),例如,礼貌的概念化(例如,“消极礼貌”和“积极礼貌”的概念)。关于后者,本书包含了一些重要的创新,我将在下面指出。1005831 engxxx10 .1177/00754242211005831《英语语言学书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Book Review: Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day
Politeness in the history of English is certainly not the first book to be written in that topic area. 2018 saw the publication of Keith Thomas’s much lauded In pursuit of civility: anners and civilization in early modern England. But that is a book written by a historian for people interested in history. The inescapable fact is that politeness, and related notions such as “civility” and “manners,” is mainly constituted in language. This is the first monograph written by a linguist focusing on the language of politeness in the history of English. To be sure, linguists have written papers on the language of English politeness in particular texts, genres, and periods, but this is the first work to encompass the broad sweep from its beginnings in the Middle Ages through to the present day. That in itself is a huge challenge, which partly explains why nobody has done it before. Seven of the ten chapters, diachronically organized, survey the development of politeness in Britain. Jucker uses a journey metaphor, specifically an “extended road trip,” to explain how he handles breadth and depth: he journeys through time, stopping to take pictures, “both close-ups of interesting details and longshot panoramas of entire sceneries” (xi). Parts of that road have been travelled by other scholars, who also have taken pictures. These pictures/studies are judiciously used, often with updatings and new framings, to fill in any gaps in Jucker’s own many studies. It would be a mistake to think that this is simply a descriptive work. Popular theories and frameworks of linguistic politeness, developed in pragmatics and interactional linguistics, are not able to provide an adequate account of how politeness works in all periods. The first chapter provides a succinct theoretical overview and sharp critique of extant work. The general approach taken by the book is a mixed one, combining both a first-order approach (i.e., one that focuses on what non-academic users do and their understandings) in the examination of politeness vocabulary and discourses on politeness, and a second-order approach (i.e., one that focuses on what academic observers do and their concepts) in theorizing about, for example, conceptualizations of politeness (e.g., the notions of “negative politeness” and “positive politeness”). Regarding the latter, the book contains some important innovations, as I will note below. 1005831 ENGXXX10.1177/00754242211005831Journal of English LinguisticsBook Review book-review2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信