重症监护环境中血流动力学监测的现代综述

Q4 Medicine
A. Rali, Amy Butcher, R. Tedford, S. Sinha, Pakinam Mekki, H. V. Van Spall, Andrew J. Sauer
{"title":"重症监护环境中血流动力学监测的现代综述","authors":"A. Rali, Amy Butcher, R. Tedford, S. Sinha, Pakinam Mekki, H. V. Van Spall, Andrew J. Sauer","doi":"10.15420/usc.2021.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hemodynamic assessment remains the most valuable adjunct to physical examination and laboratory assessment in the diagnosis and management of shock. Through the years, multiple modalities to measure and trend hemodynamic indices have evolved with varying degrees of invasiveness. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has long been considered the gold standard of hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients and in recent years has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients in cardiogenic shock. The invasive nature of PAC is often cited as its major limitation and has encouraged development of less invasive technologies. In this review, the authors summarize the literature on the mechanism and validation of several minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities available in the contemporary intensive care unit. They also provide an update on the use of focused bedside echocardiography.","PeriodicalId":37809,"journal":{"name":"US Cardiology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting\",\"authors\":\"A. Rali, Amy Butcher, R. Tedford, S. Sinha, Pakinam Mekki, H. V. Van Spall, Andrew J. Sauer\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/usc.2021.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hemodynamic assessment remains the most valuable adjunct to physical examination and laboratory assessment in the diagnosis and management of shock. Through the years, multiple modalities to measure and trend hemodynamic indices have evolved with varying degrees of invasiveness. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has long been considered the gold standard of hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients and in recent years has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients in cardiogenic shock. The invasive nature of PAC is often cited as its major limitation and has encouraged development of less invasive technologies. In this review, the authors summarize the literature on the mechanism and validation of several minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities available in the contemporary intensive care unit. They also provide an update on the use of focused bedside echocardiography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"US Cardiology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"US Cardiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2021.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2021.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在诊断和治疗休克方面,血液动力学评估仍然是体格检查和实验室评估的最有价值的辅助手段。多年来,测量和趋势血液动力学指标的多种模式已经演变成具有不同程度的侵入性。肺动脉导管(PAC)长期以来一直被认为是危重患者血液动力学评估的金标准,近年来已被证明可以改善心源性休克患者的临床结果。PAC的侵入性经常被认为是其主要局限性,并鼓励了微创技术的发展。在这篇综述中,作者总结了关于当代重症监护室中几种微创和非侵入性模式的机制和验证的文献。他们还提供了聚焦床边超声心动图的最新使用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting
Hemodynamic assessment remains the most valuable adjunct to physical examination and laboratory assessment in the diagnosis and management of shock. Through the years, multiple modalities to measure and trend hemodynamic indices have evolved with varying degrees of invasiveness. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has long been considered the gold standard of hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients and in recent years has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients in cardiogenic shock. The invasive nature of PAC is often cited as its major limitation and has encouraged development of less invasive technologies. In this review, the authors summarize the literature on the mechanism and validation of several minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities available in the contemporary intensive care unit. They also provide an update on the use of focused bedside echocardiography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
US Cardiology Review
US Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: US Cardiology Review (USC) is an international, US-English language, peer-reviewed journal that is published bi-annually and aims to assist time-pressured physicians to stay abreast of key advances and opinion in the area of cardiovascular disease. The journal comprises balanced and comprehensive review articles written by leading authorities. The journal provides updates on a range of salient issues to support physicians in developing their knowledge and effectiveness in day-to-day clinical practice. The journal endeavours to support the continuous medical education of specialist and general cardiologists and disseminate knowledge of the field to the wider cardiovascular community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信