类型很重要!

Q3 Social Sciences
Pascale Schmid, Guido Carim jr., David Sargent, D. Falla
{"title":"类型很重要!","authors":"Pascale Schmid, Guido Carim jr., David Sargent, D. Falla","doi":"10.1075/idj.22019.sch","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Electronic documentation is gaining importance in aviation and\n medicine. However, the literature on typographic conventions is rather\n scattered. Therefore, this systematic literature review examined the landscape\n of literature addressing typography in electronic documentation in aviation and\n medicine. The research examined the presence of typographic considerations,\n level of depth, choice of medium and documentation examples. The results\n demonstrate that out of 65 publications, 35 address typography in varying depth\n and often rely on inherited misconceptions. Typographic conventions are\n transferred from physical to electronic mediums without questioning and remain\n undervalued. These findings highlight the need for improved legibility in\n electronic documentation.","PeriodicalId":35109,"journal":{"name":"Information Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type does matter!\",\"authors\":\"Pascale Schmid, Guido Carim jr., David Sargent, D. Falla\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/idj.22019.sch\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Electronic documentation is gaining importance in aviation and\\n medicine. However, the literature on typographic conventions is rather\\n scattered. Therefore, this systematic literature review examined the landscape\\n of literature addressing typography in electronic documentation in aviation and\\n medicine. The research examined the presence of typographic considerations,\\n level of depth, choice of medium and documentation examples. The results\\n demonstrate that out of 65 publications, 35 address typography in varying depth\\n and often rely on inherited misconceptions. Typographic conventions are\\n transferred from physical to electronic mediums without questioning and remain\\n undervalued. These findings highlight the need for improved legibility in\\n electronic documentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22019.sch\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22019.sch","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子文件在航空和医学领域越来越重要。然而,关于排版惯例的文献相当分散。因此,这个系统的文献综述检查了在航空和医学电子文档中解决排版的文献景观。该研究审查了排版考虑、深度水平、媒介选择和文件示例的存在。结果表明,在65份出版物中,有35份涉及排版的深度不同,并且经常依赖于继承的误解。排版惯例被毫无疑问地从实体媒介转移到电子媒介,并且仍然被低估。这些调查结果突出表明需要改进电子文件的易读性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Type does matter!
Electronic documentation is gaining importance in aviation and medicine. However, the literature on typographic conventions is rather scattered. Therefore, this systematic literature review examined the landscape of literature addressing typography in electronic documentation in aviation and medicine. The research examined the presence of typographic considerations, level of depth, choice of medium and documentation examples. The results demonstrate that out of 65 publications, 35 address typography in varying depth and often rely on inherited misconceptions. Typographic conventions are transferred from physical to electronic mediums without questioning and remain undervalued. These findings highlight the need for improved legibility in electronic documentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Design Journal
Information Design Journal Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Information Design Journal (IDJ) is a peer reviewed international journal that bridges the gap between research and practice in information design. IDJ is a platform for discussing and improving the design, usability, and overall effectiveness of ‘content put into form’ — of verbal and visual messages shaped to meet the needs of particular audiences. IDJ offers a forum for sharing ideas about the verbal, visual, and typographic design of print and online documents, multimedia presentations, illustrations, signage, interfaces, maps, quantitative displays, websites, and new media. IDJ brings together ways of thinking about creating effective communications for use in contexts such as workplaces, hospitals, airports, banks, schools, or government agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信