A. Giudice, R. Perna, Teresa Baldoni, F. Scarano, A. D. Rosa, A. Pontarelli, M. Marco, Martha Alicia Falca, Clelia Di Tella, L. Atripaldi, S. Harari, A. Bianco, R. Parrella
{"title":"Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra对肺外结核诊断的评价:在低结核病患病率环境中的回顾性分析","authors":"A. Giudice, R. Perna, Teresa Baldoni, F. Scarano, A. D. Rosa, A. Pontarelli, M. Marco, Martha Alicia Falca, Clelia Di Tella, L. Atripaldi, S. Harari, A. Bianco, R. Parrella","doi":"10.4236/jtr.2021.93021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains difficult to diagnose because the \nclinical specimens to be examined are often paucibacillary and obtained with difficulty from inaccessible sites. An updated Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) test \nhas been designed and licensed to improve sensitivity in the detection of \nMycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the \nperformance of Ultra assay for the clinical diagnosis of EPTB in a low tuberculosis prevalence country. Methods: A retrospective analysis was \nperformed at “A. O dei Colli” of Naples on consecutive extrapulmonary \nspecimens for EPTB across a three-year period. All different types of \nextrapulmonary specimens were tested for EPTB by smear microscopy, culture and \nUltra assay in accordance with relevant guidelines. Results: A total of 606 EPTB samples, 561 culture negative EPTB and 45 culture \npositive EPTB were included. Using culture as reference standard, the overall \nsensitivities and specificities of Ultra assay were 95.6% (95% CI 84.8 - 99.5) and 97.5% (95% CI 95.8 - 98.6) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of \nUltra for individual category of specimens were also performed. Conclusion: In a low-tuberculosis \nprevalence setting, Ultra assay confirms to have a good performance in the \ndiagnosis of EPTB for all different extrapulmonary samples.","PeriodicalId":70603,"journal":{"name":"结核病研究(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Analysis in a Low-Tuberculosis Prevalence Setting\",\"authors\":\"A. Giudice, R. Perna, Teresa Baldoni, F. Scarano, A. D. Rosa, A. Pontarelli, M. Marco, Martha Alicia Falca, Clelia Di Tella, L. Atripaldi, S. Harari, A. Bianco, R. Parrella\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jtr.2021.93021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains difficult to diagnose because the \\nclinical specimens to be examined are often paucibacillary and obtained with difficulty from inaccessible sites. An updated Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) test \\nhas been designed and licensed to improve sensitivity in the detection of \\nMycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the \\nperformance of Ultra assay for the clinical diagnosis of EPTB in a low tuberculosis prevalence country. Methods: A retrospective analysis was \\nperformed at “A. O dei Colli” of Naples on consecutive extrapulmonary \\nspecimens for EPTB across a three-year period. All different types of \\nextrapulmonary specimens were tested for EPTB by smear microscopy, culture and \\nUltra assay in accordance with relevant guidelines. Results: A total of 606 EPTB samples, 561 culture negative EPTB and 45 culture \\npositive EPTB were included. Using culture as reference standard, the overall \\nsensitivities and specificities of Ultra assay were 95.6% (95% CI 84.8 - 99.5) and 97.5% (95% CI 95.8 - 98.6) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of \\nUltra for individual category of specimens were also performed. Conclusion: In a low-tuberculosis \\nprevalence setting, Ultra assay confirms to have a good performance in the \\ndiagnosis of EPTB for all different extrapulmonary samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":70603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"结核病研究(英文)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"结核病研究(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2021.93021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"结核病研究(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2021.93021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肺外结核(EPTB)仍然难以诊断,因为要检查的临床标本通常是少菌的,并且很难从难以接近的部位获得。更新的Xpert®MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra)测试已经设计并获得许可,以提高检测结核分枝杆菌复合体的敏感性。本研究的目的是评估在结核病发病率低的国家进行EPTB临床诊断的Ultra检测的性能。方法:对A医院进行回顾性分析。那不勒斯的O dei Colli "在三年内连续进行EPTB肺外标本检测。所有不同类型的肺外标本均按照相关指南通过涂片显微镜、培养和超滤法检测EPTB。结果:共纳入EPTB样本606份,培养阴性EPTB 561份,培养阳性EPTB 45份。以培养物为参比标准,Ultra法的总灵敏度和特异性分别为95.6% (95% CI 84.8 ~ 99.5)和97.5% (95% CI 95.8 ~ 98.6)。Ultra对个别类别标本的敏感性和特异性也进行了分析。结论:在低结核病患病率的环境下,Ultra检测在所有不同肺外样本的EPTB诊断中都有良好的表现。
Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Analysis in a Low-Tuberculosis Prevalence Setting
Background: Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains difficult to diagnose because the
clinical specimens to be examined are often paucibacillary and obtained with difficulty from inaccessible sites. An updated Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) test
has been designed and licensed to improve sensitivity in the detection of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the
performance of Ultra assay for the clinical diagnosis of EPTB in a low tuberculosis prevalence country. Methods: A retrospective analysis was
performed at “A. O dei Colli” of Naples on consecutive extrapulmonary
specimens for EPTB across a three-year period. All different types of
extrapulmonary specimens were tested for EPTB by smear microscopy, culture and
Ultra assay in accordance with relevant guidelines. Results: A total of 606 EPTB samples, 561 culture negative EPTB and 45 culture
positive EPTB were included. Using culture as reference standard, the overall
sensitivities and specificities of Ultra assay were 95.6% (95% CI 84.8 - 99.5) and 97.5% (95% CI 95.8 - 98.6) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of
Ultra for individual category of specimens were also performed. Conclusion: In a low-tuberculosis
prevalence setting, Ultra assay confirms to have a good performance in the
diagnosis of EPTB for all different extrapulmonary samples.