{"title":"使用最先进的自然语言处理技术评估接受性词汇","authors":"S. Crossley, Langdon Holmes","doi":"10.1075/jsls.22006.cro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Semantic embedding approaches commonly used in natural language processing such as transformer models have rarely\n been used to examine L2 lexical knowledge. Importantly, their performance has not been contrasted with more traditional annotation\n approaches to lexical knowledge. This study used NLP techniques related to lexical annotations and semantic embedding approaches\n to model the receptive vocabulary of L2 learners based on their lexical production during a writing task. The goal of the study is\n to examine the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches in understanding L2 lexical knowledge. Findings indicate that\n transformer approaches based on semantic embeddings outperform linguistic annotations and Word2vec models in predicting L2\n learners’ vocabulary scores. The findings help to support the strength and accuracy of semantic-embedding approaches as well as\n their generalizability across tasks when compared to linguistic feature models. Limitations to semantic-embedding approaches,\n especially interpretability, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":29903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing receptive vocabulary using state‑of‑the‑art natural language processing techniques\",\"authors\":\"S. Crossley, Langdon Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jsls.22006.cro\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Semantic embedding approaches commonly used in natural language processing such as transformer models have rarely\\n been used to examine L2 lexical knowledge. Importantly, their performance has not been contrasted with more traditional annotation\\n approaches to lexical knowledge. This study used NLP techniques related to lexical annotations and semantic embedding approaches\\n to model the receptive vocabulary of L2 learners based on their lexical production during a writing task. The goal of the study is\\n to examine the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches in understanding L2 lexical knowledge. Findings indicate that\\n transformer approaches based on semantic embeddings outperform linguistic annotations and Word2vec models in predicting L2\\n learners’ vocabulary scores. The findings help to support the strength and accuracy of semantic-embedding approaches as well as\\n their generalizability across tasks when compared to linguistic feature models. Limitations to semantic-embedding approaches,\\n especially interpretability, are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22006.cro\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22006.cro","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing receptive vocabulary using state‑of‑the‑art natural language processing techniques
Semantic embedding approaches commonly used in natural language processing such as transformer models have rarely
been used to examine L2 lexical knowledge. Importantly, their performance has not been contrasted with more traditional annotation
approaches to lexical knowledge. This study used NLP techniques related to lexical annotations and semantic embedding approaches
to model the receptive vocabulary of L2 learners based on their lexical production during a writing task. The goal of the study is
to examine the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches in understanding L2 lexical knowledge. Findings indicate that
transformer approaches based on semantic embeddings outperform linguistic annotations and Word2vec models in predicting L2
learners’ vocabulary scores. The findings help to support the strength and accuracy of semantic-embedding approaches as well as
their generalizability across tasks when compared to linguistic feature models. Limitations to semantic-embedding approaches,
especially interpretability, are discussed.