论教育的存在模式:拉图尔、元民族志与教育的社会制度

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Jonathan Tummons
{"title":"论教育的存在模式:拉图尔、元民族志与教育的社会制度","authors":"Jonathan Tummons","doi":"10.1111/1469-8676.13087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article constitutes an argument for both the use and expansion of the philosophical anthropology of Bruno Latour, as established in his recent work An Inquiry into Modes of Existence (AIME). Drawing on ethnographies of education as a methodology for empirical inquiry and specifically on meta-ethnography as a methodology for establishing objectivized knowledge concerning education in a manner that is commensurate to the underpinning epistemological and ontological principles of AIME, this article explicates and then applies the theoretical components of AIME to the field of education research and proposes that education be added to Latour’s schema as an additional mode of existence.","PeriodicalId":35019,"journal":{"name":"Social Anthropology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1469-8676.13087","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the educational mode of existence: Latour, meta‐ethnography and the social institution of education\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Tummons\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1469-8676.13087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article constitutes an argument for both the use and expansion of the philosophical anthropology of Bruno Latour, as established in his recent work An Inquiry into Modes of Existence (AIME). Drawing on ethnographies of education as a methodology for empirical inquiry and specifically on meta-ethnography as a methodology for establishing objectivized knowledge concerning education in a manner that is commensurate to the underpinning epistemological and ontological principles of AIME, this article explicates and then applies the theoretical components of AIME to the field of education research and proposes that education be added to Latour’s schema as an additional mode of existence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Anthropology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1469-8676.13087\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.13087\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.13087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)的哲学人类学的使用和扩展进行了论证,正如他在最近的作品《存在模式的探究》(AIME)中所建立的那样。将教育民族志作为一种实证研究的方法,特别是将元民族志作为一种建立客观教育知识的方法,这种方法与AIME的基础认识论和本体论原则相称,本文阐明了AIME的理论组成部分,然后将其应用于教育研究领域,并建议将教育作为一种额外的存在模式添加到拉图尔的图式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the educational mode of existence: Latour, meta‐ethnography and the social institution of education
This article constitutes an argument for both the use and expansion of the philosophical anthropology of Bruno Latour, as established in his recent work An Inquiry into Modes of Existence (AIME). Drawing on ethnographies of education as a methodology for empirical inquiry and specifically on meta-ethnography as a methodology for establishing objectivized knowledge concerning education in a manner that is commensurate to the underpinning epistemological and ontological principles of AIME, this article explicates and then applies the theoretical components of AIME to the field of education research and proposes that education be added to Latour’s schema as an additional mode of existence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Anthropology
Social Anthropology Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale is the acclaimed Journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists, the major professional organization for anthropologists in Europe. While European in profile, this leading Journal has a global scope. It publishes key contributions by both established and up-and-coming anthropologists. As part of the intellectual vitality of the Journal, it also features an exciting Debate in every issue, an important Review Essay which discusses outstanding books in adjoining disciplines or in public debate from an anthropological point of view, and a thriving Book Reviews Section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信