M. Islam, T. Ahmed, Sheikh Muhammad Najmul Imam, Muhammad Ifaz, H. Islam
{"title":"纺织钢筋混凝土板的弯曲和冲击性能","authors":"M. Islam, T. Ahmed, Sheikh Muhammad Najmul Imam, Muhammad Ifaz, H. Islam","doi":"10.1177/20414196221095250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Steel is susceptible to corrosion and requires a significant concrete cover, which increases self-weight and cost. Therefore, an alternative to traditional reinforcements is needed. Textile reinforced concrete (TRC) is a favorable composite using textile material as reinforcement with a fine-grained concrete matrix. This study represents a comparison between different TRCs having different textile reinforcements subjected to flexural bending and impact loading. Four types of textiles—glass (GT), a square oriented galvanized iron (SGIT), diagonal pattern galvanized iron (DGIT), and carbon (CT) are used. All four types of textiles are used to prepare 400 x 50 x12 mm textile reinforced mortar (TRM) and tested for tensile strength properties. This study tests TRC panel and plate samples by three-point bending and drop-weight impact methods. The uniaxial tensile strength test of the textiles shows that CTs can take around 2.3 times higher tensile load than SGITs. However, their tensile load capacity is almost similar in the case of TRM, where SGIT textile shows about 30% higher extension. The flexural bending test of the TRC panels shows that the load-carrying ability increases nearly two times with the increase of 25 mm in thickness even when the number of reinforcement layers remains the same. With the increase in thickness, SGIT textile shows better performance. Drop-weight impact test of the TRC plates shows that the impact energy absorption in CT textile plates is up to two times higher than SGIT plates for various thicknesses. This study summarizes that CT shows overall better performance than SGIT.","PeriodicalId":46272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Protective Structures","volume":"14 1","pages":"221 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural and impact behavior of textile reinforced concrete panel\",\"authors\":\"M. Islam, T. Ahmed, Sheikh Muhammad Najmul Imam, Muhammad Ifaz, H. Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20414196221095250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Steel is susceptible to corrosion and requires a significant concrete cover, which increases self-weight and cost. Therefore, an alternative to traditional reinforcements is needed. Textile reinforced concrete (TRC) is a favorable composite using textile material as reinforcement with a fine-grained concrete matrix. This study represents a comparison between different TRCs having different textile reinforcements subjected to flexural bending and impact loading. Four types of textiles—glass (GT), a square oriented galvanized iron (SGIT), diagonal pattern galvanized iron (DGIT), and carbon (CT) are used. All four types of textiles are used to prepare 400 x 50 x12 mm textile reinforced mortar (TRM) and tested for tensile strength properties. This study tests TRC panel and plate samples by three-point bending and drop-weight impact methods. The uniaxial tensile strength test of the textiles shows that CTs can take around 2.3 times higher tensile load than SGITs. However, their tensile load capacity is almost similar in the case of TRM, where SGIT textile shows about 30% higher extension. The flexural bending test of the TRC panels shows that the load-carrying ability increases nearly two times with the increase of 25 mm in thickness even when the number of reinforcement layers remains the same. With the increase in thickness, SGIT textile shows better performance. Drop-weight impact test of the TRC plates shows that the impact energy absorption in CT textile plates is up to two times higher than SGIT plates for various thicknesses. This study summarizes that CT shows overall better performance than SGIT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Protective Structures\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"221 - 241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Protective Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196221095250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Protective Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196221095250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
钢易受腐蚀,需要大量的混凝土保护层,这会增加自重和成本。因此,需要一种替代传统钢筋的方法。织物增强混凝土(TRC)是一种以织物材料为增强材料,以细粒混凝土为基体的良好复合材料。本研究比较了具有不同织物增强物的不同TRC在弯曲和冲击载荷下的性能。使用了四种类型的纺织品——玻璃(GT)、方形镀锌铁(SGIT)、斜向镀锌铁(DGIT)和碳(CT)。所有四种类型的纺织品都用于制备400 x 50 x12 mm织物增强砂浆(TRM),并测试拉伸强度性能。本研究采用三点弯曲和落锤冲击法对TRC面板和板材样品进行了测试。纺织品的单轴拉伸强度测试表明,CT可以承受比SGIT高约2.3倍的拉伸载荷。然而,在TRM的情况下,它们的拉伸负载能力几乎相似,其中SGIT纺织品显示出约30%的高延展性。TRC面板的弯曲试验表明,随着25 即使在加强层的数量保持不变的情况下,厚度也为mm。随着厚度的增加,SGIT纺织品表现出更好的性能。TRC板的落锤冲击试验表明,对于不同厚度,CT织物板的冲击能量吸收比SGIT板高出两倍。本研究总结了CT显示出比SGIT更好的整体性能。
Flexural and impact behavior of textile reinforced concrete panel
Steel is susceptible to corrosion and requires a significant concrete cover, which increases self-weight and cost. Therefore, an alternative to traditional reinforcements is needed. Textile reinforced concrete (TRC) is a favorable composite using textile material as reinforcement with a fine-grained concrete matrix. This study represents a comparison between different TRCs having different textile reinforcements subjected to flexural bending and impact loading. Four types of textiles—glass (GT), a square oriented galvanized iron (SGIT), diagonal pattern galvanized iron (DGIT), and carbon (CT) are used. All four types of textiles are used to prepare 400 x 50 x12 mm textile reinforced mortar (TRM) and tested for tensile strength properties. This study tests TRC panel and plate samples by three-point bending and drop-weight impact methods. The uniaxial tensile strength test of the textiles shows that CTs can take around 2.3 times higher tensile load than SGITs. However, their tensile load capacity is almost similar in the case of TRM, where SGIT textile shows about 30% higher extension. The flexural bending test of the TRC panels shows that the load-carrying ability increases nearly two times with the increase of 25 mm in thickness even when the number of reinforcement layers remains the same. With the increase in thickness, SGIT textile shows better performance. Drop-weight impact test of the TRC plates shows that the impact energy absorption in CT textile plates is up to two times higher than SGIT plates for various thicknesses. This study summarizes that CT shows overall better performance than SGIT.