教师表扬与斥责:观察性估计的普遍性与可靠性检验

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Margaret T. Floress, A. Briesch, Lyndsay N. Jenkins, Kaylee A. Hampton
{"title":"教师表扬与斥责:观察性估计的普遍性与可靠性检验","authors":"Margaret T. Floress, A. Briesch, Lyndsay N. Jenkins, Kaylee A. Hampton","doi":"10.1177/01987429211012020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the generalizability and dependability of observational estimates of middle and high school teachers’ use of praise and reprimands. Frequency of behavior-specific praise, general praise, and total reprimands were collected across 67, 20-min observations that took place during class-wide instruction in general education classrooms. Generalizability theory was used to determine the number of observations needed to obtain dependable estimates of teacher behavior. Behavior-specific praise rates were consistently low. General praise rates were slightly higher and reprimand rates were notably higher and slightly more variable. Total reprimands had the strongest generalizability results and general praise had the weakest. Behavior-specific praise reached an acceptable level of dependability after 15 min, whereas general praise required a 35-min observation, and reprimand only required 5 min. Implications and future directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47249,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"47 1","pages":"196 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01987429211012020","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Praise and Reprimand: Examining the Generalizability and Dependability of Observational Estimates\",\"authors\":\"Margaret T. Floress, A. Briesch, Lyndsay N. Jenkins, Kaylee A. Hampton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01987429211012020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the generalizability and dependability of observational estimates of middle and high school teachers’ use of praise and reprimands. Frequency of behavior-specific praise, general praise, and total reprimands were collected across 67, 20-min observations that took place during class-wide instruction in general education classrooms. Generalizability theory was used to determine the number of observations needed to obtain dependable estimates of teacher behavior. Behavior-specific praise rates were consistently low. General praise rates were slightly higher and reprimand rates were notably higher and slightly more variable. Total reprimands had the strongest generalizability results and general praise had the weakest. Behavior-specific praise reached an acceptable level of dependability after 15 min, whereas general praise required a 35-min observation, and reprimand only required 5 min. Implications and future directions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Disorders\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01987429211012020\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211012020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211012020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨了初高中教师使用表扬和斥责的观察性估计的普遍性和可靠性。针对特定行为的表扬、一般表扬和总训斥的频率是通过在普通教育课堂上进行的67,20分钟的观察来收集的。概率性理论被用来确定观察的数量,以获得可靠的估计教师的行为。行为相关的表扬率一直很低。一般表扬率略高,谴责率明显较高,而且变化略大。总的斥责具有最强的概括性结果,而一般表扬具有最弱的概括性结果。特定行为的表扬在15分钟后达到可接受的可靠性水平,而一般表扬需要35分钟的观察,谴责只需要5分钟。讨论了影响和未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teacher Praise and Reprimand: Examining the Generalizability and Dependability of Observational Estimates
This study examined the generalizability and dependability of observational estimates of middle and high school teachers’ use of praise and reprimands. Frequency of behavior-specific praise, general praise, and total reprimands were collected across 67, 20-min observations that took place during class-wide instruction in general education classrooms. Generalizability theory was used to determine the number of observations needed to obtain dependable estimates of teacher behavior. Behavior-specific praise rates were consistently low. General praise rates were slightly higher and reprimand rates were notably higher and slightly more variable. Total reprimands had the strongest generalizability results and general praise had the weakest. Behavior-specific praise reached an acceptable level of dependability after 15 min, whereas general praise required a 35-min observation, and reprimand only required 5 min. Implications and future directions are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Behavioral Disorders is sent to all members of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (CCBD), a division of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). All CCBD members must first be members of CEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信