非法:英国的家庭与耻辱,1660-1834

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
S. Williams
{"title":"非法:英国的家庭与耻辱,1660-1834","authors":"S. Williams","doi":"10.1080/14780038.2023.2210867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"longer processes could be addressed further. Indeed, a key conclusion of Peck’s book is the modernity of early modern memory. The conclusion draws similarities between memories of the civil wars in the 1650s and those of twentieth-century conflicts (including Burundi, Cambodia, Finland, Greece, Guatemala, Spain, and Zimbabwe) in three areas: remembering and forgetting as processes of healing and settling; the treatment of key actors in a recent conflict; and the difficulties of authorities to control popular memories. Peck’s book is not just an essential study of English memories of the mid-seventeenth-century civil wars; it is an important contribution to debates about the nature of early modern memory, its relation to the present, and the challenges facing any post-conflict society.","PeriodicalId":45240,"journal":{"name":"Cultural & Social History","volume":"20 1","pages":"464 - 466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegitimacy: Family and Stigma in England, 1660-1834\",\"authors\":\"S. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14780038.2023.2210867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"longer processes could be addressed further. Indeed, a key conclusion of Peck’s book is the modernity of early modern memory. The conclusion draws similarities between memories of the civil wars in the 1650s and those of twentieth-century conflicts (including Burundi, Cambodia, Finland, Greece, Guatemala, Spain, and Zimbabwe) in three areas: remembering and forgetting as processes of healing and settling; the treatment of key actors in a recent conflict; and the difficulties of authorities to control popular memories. Peck’s book is not just an essential study of English memories of the mid-seventeenth-century civil wars; it is an important contribution to debates about the nature of early modern memory, its relation to the present, and the challenges facing any post-conflict society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"464 - 466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2023.2210867\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural & Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2023.2210867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可以进一步处理更长的过程。事实上,佩克的书的一个关键结论是早期现代记忆的现代性。结论得出了1650年代内战记忆与20世纪冲突记忆(包括布隆迪、柬埔寨、芬兰、希腊、危地马拉、西班牙和津巴布韦)在三个方面的相似之处:记忆和遗忘是治愈和解决的过程;最近一次冲突中关键行为者的待遇;以及当局难以控制大众记忆。佩克的书不仅是对17世纪中期内战的英国记忆的重要研究;它对关于早期现代记忆的性质、它与现在的关系以及任何冲突后社会面临的挑战的辩论做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illegitimacy: Family and Stigma in England, 1660-1834
longer processes could be addressed further. Indeed, a key conclusion of Peck’s book is the modernity of early modern memory. The conclusion draws similarities between memories of the civil wars in the 1650s and those of twentieth-century conflicts (including Burundi, Cambodia, Finland, Greece, Guatemala, Spain, and Zimbabwe) in three areas: remembering and forgetting as processes of healing and settling; the treatment of key actors in a recent conflict; and the difficulties of authorities to control popular memories. Peck’s book is not just an essential study of English memories of the mid-seventeenth-century civil wars; it is an important contribution to debates about the nature of early modern memory, its relation to the present, and the challenges facing any post-conflict society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Cultural & Social History is published on behalf of the Social History Society (SHS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society, please download an application form on the Society"s website and follow the instructions provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信