合法性是否影响食品安全管理中的协同监管？来自中国的证据

IF 2.2 3区管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Performance & Management Review Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196

Guochong Xu, Longxia Huo, Can Chen

{"title":"合法性是否影响食品安全管理中的协同监管？来自中国的证据","authors":"Guochong Xu, Longxia Huo, Can Chen","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article discusses the influence of external and internal legitimacy on food safety collaborative regulation. Drawing upon the legitimacy theory, this research proposes key hypotheses: (1) external legitimacy shapes the overall features of collaborative regulation, and (2) internal legitimacy influences partner selection. This research empirically tests research hypotheses using social network analysis (bootstrap t-test and MR-QAP) and the food safety regulation documents jointly issued by the Chinese central government’s agencies during 2010–2017. It finds that external legitimacy influences the overall characteristics of collaborative networks (cohesion), and internal legitimacy influences the local characteristics of collaborative networks, that is, partner selection (pragmatic consideration and cognitive consideration). Although partner selection is driven by both pragmatic and cognitive considerations, the latter is much more important.","PeriodicalId":47571,"journal":{"name":"Public Performance & Management Review","volume":"46 1","pages":"691 - 714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Legitimacy Affect the Collaborative Regulation in the Food Safety Administration? Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Guochong Xu, Longxia Huo, Can Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article discusses the influence of external and internal legitimacy on food safety collaborative regulation. Drawing upon the legitimacy theory, this research proposes key hypotheses: (1) external legitimacy shapes the overall features of collaborative regulation, and (2) internal legitimacy influences partner selection. This research empirically tests research hypotheses using social network analysis (bootstrap t-test and MR-QAP) and the food safety regulation documents jointly issued by the Chinese central government’s agencies during 2010–2017. It finds that external legitimacy influences the overall characteristics of collaborative networks (cohesion), and internal legitimacy influences the local characteristics of collaborative networks, that is, partner selection (pragmatic consideration and cognitive consideration). Although partner selection is driven by both pragmatic and cognitive considerations, the latter is much more important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Performance & Management Review\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"691 - 714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Performance & Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Performance & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了外部合法性和内部合法性对食品安全协同监管的影响。借鉴合法性理论，本研究提出了关键假设:(1)外部合法性塑造了协同监管的整体特征;(2)内部合法性影响合作伙伴选择。本研究利用社会网络分析(bootstrap t检验和MR-QAP)和2010-2017年中国中央政府部门联合发布的食品安全监管文件对研究假设进行实证检验。研究发现，外部合法性影响协作网络的整体特征(凝聚力)，内部合法性影响协作网络的局部特征，即伙伴选择(语用考虑和认知考虑)。尽管伴侣的选择受到实用主义和认知因素的双重影响，但后者更为重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does Legitimacy Affect the Collaborative Regulation in the Food Safety Administration? Evidence from China

Abstract This article discusses the influence of external and internal legitimacy on food safety collaborative regulation. Drawing upon the legitimacy theory, this research proposes key hypotheses: (1) external legitimacy shapes the overall features of collaborative regulation, and (2) internal legitimacy influences partner selection. This research empirically tests research hypotheses using social network analysis (bootstrap t-test and MR-QAP) and the food safety regulation documents jointly issued by the Chinese central government’s agencies during 2010–2017. It finds that external legitimacy influences the overall characteristics of collaborative networks (cohesion), and internal legitimacy influences the local characteristics of collaborative networks, that is, partner selection (pragmatic consideration and cognitive consideration). Although partner selection is driven by both pragmatic and cognitive considerations, the latter is much more important.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Performance & Management Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

16.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.