自我评估和同伴评估的混合方法研究：网络写作作业评分对科学新闻素养的影响

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

College & Undergraduate Libraries Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10691316.2021.1889426

Wei Zakharov, Haiyan Li, M. Fosmire, P. Pascuzzi, J. Harbor

{"title":"自我评估和同伴评估的混合方法研究：网络写作作业评分对科学新闻素养的影响","authors":"Wei Zakharov, Haiyan Li, M. Fosmire, P. Pascuzzi, J. Harbor","doi":"10.1080/10691316.2021.1889426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The current dynamic information environment allows readers to access a vast amount of content, but of varied quality. Information professionals increasingly should promote students’ scientific news literacy and critical thinking skills. The challenge for instructors, however, is to assess and provide constructive feedback on writing assignments, especially in large-scale online classes. Online peer-assessment tools can facilitate reliable self- and peer-assessment in scientific literacy education at scale. This mixed method study empirically examines differences between self- and peer-assessment and inter-rater reliability among peer assessors and investigates patterns of discrepancies in grading.","PeriodicalId":44684,"journal":{"name":"College & Undergraduate Libraries","volume":"28 1","pages":"67 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10691316.2021.1889426","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed method study of self- and peer-assessment: Implications of grading online writing assignments on scientific news literacy\",\"authors\":\"Wei Zakharov, Haiyan Li, M. Fosmire, P. Pascuzzi, J. Harbor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10691316.2021.1889426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The current dynamic information environment allows readers to access a vast amount of content, but of varied quality. Information professionals increasingly should promote students’ scientific news literacy and critical thinking skills. The challenge for instructors, however, is to assess and provide constructive feedback on writing assignments, especially in large-scale online classes. Online peer-assessment tools can facilitate reliable self- and peer-assessment in scientific literacy education at scale. This mixed method study empirically examines differences between self- and peer-assessment and inter-rater reliability among peer assessors and investigates patterns of discrepancies in grading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"College & Undergraduate Libraries\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"67 - 84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10691316.2021.1889426\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"College & Undergraduate Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2021.1889426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College & Undergraduate Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2021.1889426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

当前动态的信息环境使读者能够访问大量的内容，但质量参差不齐。信息专业人员越来越应该提高学生的科学新闻素养和批判性思维能力。然而，教师面临的挑战是对写作作业进行评估并提供建设性的反馈，尤其是在大规模的在线课程中。在线同行评估工具可以促进大规模科学素养教育中可靠的自我评估和同行评估。这种混合方法研究实证检验了自我和同行评估之间的差异以及同行评估者之间的评级可靠性，并调查了评分差异的模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A mixed method study of self- and peer-assessment: Implications of grading online writing assignments on scientific news literacy

Abstract The current dynamic information environment allows readers to access a vast amount of content, but of varied quality. Information professionals increasingly should promote students’ scientific news literacy and critical thinking skills. The challenge for instructors, however, is to assess and provide constructive feedback on writing assignments, especially in large-scale online classes. Online peer-assessment tools can facilitate reliable self- and peer-assessment in scientific literacy education at scale. This mixed method study empirically examines differences between self- and peer-assessment and inter-rater reliability among peer assessors and investigates patterns of discrepancies in grading.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

College & Undergraduate Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： College & Undergraduate Libraries enables libraries serving primarily undergraduate students to enhance the range of services, resources, and facilities offered to their constituents while also contributing to staff professional development. Whether focusing on public services, technical services, management, or technology, the journal highlights the fact that undergraduate libraries must collaborate with agencies both on and off campus in order to survive and thrive. In addition to numerous columns on current topics, typical contents include research-based articles, case studies, reports of best practices, an occasional literature review or product review, and opinion pieces.