{"title":"反义复合词的构造","authors":"Xiaolong Lu","doi":"10.1075/consl.21012.lu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In modern Chinese, the adverb chi-zao is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with\n morphemes chi ‘late’ and zao ‘early’ as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation\n of chi-zao as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar\n perspective. This study reports on the historical change of chi-zao as evidence showing the interplay of\n antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of\n chi-zao as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern\n Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light\n on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations:\n subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and\n phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use\n plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The constructionalization of antonymous compounds\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolong Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/consl.21012.lu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In modern Chinese, the adverb chi-zao is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with\\n morphemes chi ‘late’ and zao ‘early’ as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation\\n of chi-zao as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar\\n perspective. This study reports on the historical change of chi-zao as evidence showing the interplay of\\n antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of\\n chi-zao as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern\\n Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light\\n on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations:\\n subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and\\n phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use\\n plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.21012.lu\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.21012.lu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In modern Chinese, the adverb chi-zao is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with
morphemes chi ‘late’ and zao ‘early’ as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation
of chi-zao as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar
perspective. This study reports on the historical change of chi-zao as evidence showing the interplay of
antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of
chi-zao as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern
Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light
on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations:
subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and
phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use
plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.
期刊介绍:
Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.