反义复合词的构造

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Xiaolong Lu
{"title":"反义复合词的构造","authors":"Xiaolong Lu","doi":"10.1075/consl.21012.lu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In modern Chinese, the adverb chi-zao is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with\n morphemes chi ‘late’ and zao ‘early’ as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation\n of chi-zao as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar\n perspective. This study reports on the historical change of chi-zao as evidence showing the interplay of\n antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of\n chi-zao as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern\n Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light\n on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations:\n subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and\n phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use\n plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The constructionalization of antonymous compounds\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolong Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/consl.21012.lu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In modern Chinese, the adverb chi-zao is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with\\n morphemes chi ‘late’ and zao ‘early’ as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation\\n of chi-zao as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar\\n perspective. This study reports on the historical change of chi-zao as evidence showing the interplay of\\n antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of\\n chi-zao as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern\\n Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light\\n on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations:\\n subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and\\n phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use\\n plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.21012.lu\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.21012.lu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代汉语中,副词迟早被认为是一个形容词-形容词复合词,语素迟晚和早早是一个可分级的时间性的极端。从历时构式语法的角度来看,语词作为反义复合词的形成并没有受到太多的关注。本研究以现代汉语词藻的历史变迁为证据,说明反义复合词与构筑物之间的相互作用。通过对语料库的分析,笔者发现,“词”作为一种词汇结构的形成,在前现代汉语中继承了以往的变化,但又瞬间出现,其形式被浓缩,其意义被漂白,以表明主体性。三个论点揭示了建构化的模式:(1)复合层次的建构化可以与主观性、频率和隐喻三个动机相关联;(2)汉语复合词构词法不仅在句子和短语层面上起作用,而且在形态层面上也起作用;(3)修辞学作为语言使用的一种输出,在与匿名复合词相关的建构化发展中起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The constructionalization of antonymous compounds
In modern Chinese, the adverb chi-zao is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with morphemes chi ‘late’ and zao ‘early’ as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation of chi-zao as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar perspective. This study reports on the historical change of chi-zao as evidence showing the interplay of antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of chi-zao as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations: subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信