“他的想法是什么?”:塞缪尔·丹尼尔的《费洛塔斯》中的动机、历史和戏剧

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Alzada Tipton
{"title":"“他的想法是什么?”:塞缪尔·丹尼尔的《费洛塔斯》中的动机、历史和戏剧","authors":"Alzada Tipton","doi":"10.1353/sip.2020.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Samuel Daniel's play Philotas (1605), especially in the trial of Philotas, emphasizes the detection of interior motives underlying public, external actions, particularly in the service of making a value judgment about those motives. At the same time, the play demonstrates that this kind of detection is ultimately impossible, illustrated by the fact that characters attribute different and competing motives to the same outward appearances and actions. This revelation of the inaccessibility of interior motive has implications for Daniel's views regarding writing history and writing drama—as the play shows, both genres are necessarily built on a foundation of external and public action yet seek to uncover interior motive. Finally, however, the emphasis on interpretation in Philotas, as well as Daniel's defense of himself and his play, shows his commitment to interpreting motive—and his efforts to influence others' interpretations of his own motives for writing the play.","PeriodicalId":45500,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","volume":"117 1","pages":"40 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sip.2020.0001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"What hath been his mind?\\\": Motivation, History, and Theater in Samuel Daniel's Philotas\",\"authors\":\"Alzada Tipton\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sip.2020.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Samuel Daniel's play Philotas (1605), especially in the trial of Philotas, emphasizes the detection of interior motives underlying public, external actions, particularly in the service of making a value judgment about those motives. At the same time, the play demonstrates that this kind of detection is ultimately impossible, illustrated by the fact that characters attribute different and competing motives to the same outward appearances and actions. This revelation of the inaccessibility of interior motive has implications for Daniel's views regarding writing history and writing drama—as the play shows, both genres are necessarily built on a foundation of external and public action yet seek to uncover interior motive. Finally, however, the emphasis on interpretation in Philotas, as well as Daniel's defense of himself and his play, shows his commitment to interpreting motive—and his efforts to influence others' interpretations of his own motives for writing the play.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sip.2020.0001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2020.0001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2020.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:塞缪尔·丹尼尔的戏剧《菲洛塔斯》(1605),尤其是在对菲洛塔斯的审判中,强调了对公众、外部行为背后的内在动机的探测,特别是在对这些动机进行价值判断的服务中。同时,该剧表明,这种检测最终是不可能的,角色将不同的、相互竞争的动机归因于相同的外表和行为。内在动机的不可接近性的揭示对丹尼尔关于写历史和写戏剧的观点有着启示——正如戏剧所表明的那样,这两种类型都必然建立在外部和公共行动的基础上,但都试图揭示内在动机。然而,最后,《菲洛塔斯》对解读的重视,以及丹尼尔对自己和他的剧本的辩护,表明了他对解读动机的承诺——以及他努力影响他人对他自己创作剧本动机的解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"What hath been his mind?": Motivation, History, and Theater in Samuel Daniel's Philotas
Abstract:Samuel Daniel's play Philotas (1605), especially in the trial of Philotas, emphasizes the detection of interior motives underlying public, external actions, particularly in the service of making a value judgment about those motives. At the same time, the play demonstrates that this kind of detection is ultimately impossible, illustrated by the fact that characters attribute different and competing motives to the same outward appearances and actions. This revelation of the inaccessibility of interior motive has implications for Daniel's views regarding writing history and writing drama—as the play shows, both genres are necessarily built on a foundation of external and public action yet seek to uncover interior motive. Finally, however, the emphasis on interpretation in Philotas, as well as Daniel's defense of himself and his play, shows his commitment to interpreting motive—and his efforts to influence others' interpretations of his own motives for writing the play.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Studies in Philology addresses scholars in a wide range of disciplines, though traditionally its strength has been English Medieval and Renaissance studies. SIP publishes articles on British literature before 1900 and on relations between British literature and works in the Classical, Romance, and Germanic Languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信