灌溉对象草形态的影响及其基因型依赖性反应

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Robson Elpídio Pereira Ribeiro, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello, Márcio Vieira da Cunha, Suellen Brandão de Miranda Costa, Janerson José Coelho, Rayanne Thalita de Almeida de Souza, Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos
{"title":"灌溉对象草形态的影响及其基因型依赖性反应","authors":"Robson Elpídio Pereira Ribeiro,&nbsp;Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello,&nbsp;Márcio Vieira da Cunha,&nbsp;Suellen Brandão de Miranda Costa,&nbsp;Janerson José Coelho,&nbsp;Rayanne Thalita de Almeida de Souza,&nbsp;Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study hypothesised that different elephant grass genotypes respond differently in terms of their morphological development to irrigation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how water availability could affect the morphological development of different genotypes of elephant grass. The treatments consisted of four genotypes of elephant grass [<i>Cenchrus purpureus</i> (Schumach.) Morrone], managed under irrigation or not, during a two-year field trial. The experiment was arranged in a randomised block design in a split-plot, with four replicates per treatment (<i>n</i> = 4). Between the genotypes, two of them were classified as tall-sized (IRI 381 and Elephant B), and two as dwarfs (Taiwan A-146 2.37 and Mott). A three-way interaction between season, irrigation, and genotype affected the variables plant height, stem diameter, number of dead tillers, light interception (LI), and leaf area index (LAI) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The morphological development of all genotypes was negatively impacted by the dry season. All genotypes grew taller during the rainy season (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) and had a greater light interception (62%–80%) compared to the dry period (28%–59%). The genotype Mott, showed comparable LI and LAI to the tall-sized genotypes, whilst Taiwan A-146 2.37 was characterized by the lowest values, despite being the genotype with the greatest tiller density (60 tillers m<sup>−2</sup>) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The use of irrigation mitigated the negative effects of the dry season on the plants, however, the type and size (tall vs. dwarf) of the elephant grass genotypes defined the extent of the responses to the use of the irrigation during the dry period.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Irrigation effects on elephant grass morphology, and its genotype-dependent responses\",\"authors\":\"Robson Elpídio Pereira Ribeiro,&nbsp;Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello,&nbsp;Márcio Vieira da Cunha,&nbsp;Suellen Brandão de Miranda Costa,&nbsp;Janerson José Coelho,&nbsp;Rayanne Thalita de Almeida de Souza,&nbsp;Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study hypothesised that different elephant grass genotypes respond differently in terms of their morphological development to irrigation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how water availability could affect the morphological development of different genotypes of elephant grass. The treatments consisted of four genotypes of elephant grass [<i>Cenchrus purpureus</i> (Schumach.) Morrone], managed under irrigation or not, during a two-year field trial. The experiment was arranged in a randomised block design in a split-plot, with four replicates per treatment (<i>n</i> = 4). Between the genotypes, two of them were classified as tall-sized (IRI 381 and Elephant B), and two as dwarfs (Taiwan A-146 2.37 and Mott). A three-way interaction between season, irrigation, and genotype affected the variables plant height, stem diameter, number of dead tillers, light interception (LI), and leaf area index (LAI) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The morphological development of all genotypes was negatively impacted by the dry season. All genotypes grew taller during the rainy season (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) and had a greater light interception (62%–80%) compared to the dry period (28%–59%). The genotype Mott, showed comparable LI and LAI to the tall-sized genotypes, whilst Taiwan A-146 2.37 was characterized by the lowest values, despite being the genotype with the greatest tiller density (60 tillers m<sup>−2</sup>) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The use of irrigation mitigated the negative effects of the dry season on the plants, however, the type and size (tall vs. dwarf) of the elephant grass genotypes defined the extent of the responses to the use of the irrigation during the dry period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究假设不同的象草基因型对灌溉的形态发育有不同的反应。本研究旨在探讨水分供应对不同基因型象草形态发育的影响。处理包括4个基因型象草[Cenchrus purpureus (Schumach.)]。在为期两年的田间试验中,是否在灌溉下进行管理。试验采用裂图随机区组设计,每个处理4个重复(n = 4)。在基因型中,2个为高体型(IRI 381和Elephant B), 2个为矮体型(台湾a -146 2.37和莫特)。季节、灌溉和基因型三者之间的交互作用影响了株高、茎粗、死分蘖数、截光量(LI)和叶面积指数(LAI) (p < 0.05)。所有基因型的形态发育均受旱季的不利影响。所有基因型在雨季都长高(p < 0.05),并且比旱季(28%-59%)有更大的光拦截(62%-80%)。Mott基因型的LI和LAI与高号基因型相当,而台湾A-146 2.37是分蘖密度最大的基因型(60个分蘖m−2),但其数值最低(p < 0.05)。灌溉的使用减轻了旱季对植物的负面影响,然而,象草基因型的类型和大小(高与矮)决定了旱季对灌溉使用的响应程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Irrigation effects on elephant grass morphology, and its genotype-dependent responses

This study hypothesised that different elephant grass genotypes respond differently in terms of their morphological development to irrigation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how water availability could affect the morphological development of different genotypes of elephant grass. The treatments consisted of four genotypes of elephant grass [Cenchrus purpureus (Schumach.) Morrone], managed under irrigation or not, during a two-year field trial. The experiment was arranged in a randomised block design in a split-plot, with four replicates per treatment (n = 4). Between the genotypes, two of them were classified as tall-sized (IRI 381 and Elephant B), and two as dwarfs (Taiwan A-146 2.37 and Mott). A three-way interaction between season, irrigation, and genotype affected the variables plant height, stem diameter, number of dead tillers, light interception (LI), and leaf area index (LAI) (p < .05). The morphological development of all genotypes was negatively impacted by the dry season. All genotypes grew taller during the rainy season (p < .05) and had a greater light interception (62%–80%) compared to the dry period (28%–59%). The genotype Mott, showed comparable LI and LAI to the tall-sized genotypes, whilst Taiwan A-146 2.37 was characterized by the lowest values, despite being the genotype with the greatest tiller density (60 tillers m−2) (p < .05). The use of irrigation mitigated the negative effects of the dry season on the plants, however, the type and size (tall vs. dwarf) of the elephant grass genotypes defined the extent of the responses to the use of the irrigation during the dry period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信