通过自然科学教授和学习演绎和归纳推理

Q4 Arts and Humanities
C. Salazar-Arbeláez, Diego Botero-Herrera, Luz Giraldo-Cárdenas
{"title":"通过自然科学教授和学习演绎和归纳推理","authors":"C. Salazar-Arbeláez, Diego Botero-Herrera, Luz Giraldo-Cárdenas","doi":"10.17081/eduhum.22.38.3732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To identify whether the teaching of deductive and inductive reasoning through natural sciences leads to significant learning progress in fifth-grade primary school students at an Educational Institution. Method: A quasi-experimental design was selected, including two intact groups (an experimental group and a control group) and the use of a pre-test and a post-test. Natural science contents were taught to the experimental group for the purpose of encouraging deductive and inductive reasoning, whereas the same contents were taught to the control group but with no stimulation of deductive and inductive reasoning. Findings: Statistically significant progress was observed in the experimental group, as assessed by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Discussion and Conclusions: The study showed that significant learning progress is achieved when deductive and inductive reasoning is used in natural science content teaching. This can be explained if we consider the active role of the teacher, who sought student cognitive involvement by means of deductive and inductive reasoning, in addition to the time devoted to the practice of such reasoning","PeriodicalId":30507,"journal":{"name":"Educacion y Humanismo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enseñanza y aprendizaje del razonamiento deductivo e inductivo a través de las ciencias naturales\",\"authors\":\"C. Salazar-Arbeláez, Diego Botero-Herrera, Luz Giraldo-Cárdenas\",\"doi\":\"10.17081/eduhum.22.38.3732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To identify whether the teaching of deductive and inductive reasoning through natural sciences leads to significant learning progress in fifth-grade primary school students at an Educational Institution. Method: A quasi-experimental design was selected, including two intact groups (an experimental group and a control group) and the use of a pre-test and a post-test. Natural science contents were taught to the experimental group for the purpose of encouraging deductive and inductive reasoning, whereas the same contents were taught to the control group but with no stimulation of deductive and inductive reasoning. Findings: Statistically significant progress was observed in the experimental group, as assessed by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Discussion and Conclusions: The study showed that significant learning progress is achieved when deductive and inductive reasoning is used in natural science content teaching. This can be explained if we consider the active role of the teacher, who sought student cognitive involvement by means of deductive and inductive reasoning, in addition to the time devoted to the practice of such reasoning\",\"PeriodicalId\":30507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacion y Humanismo\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacion y Humanismo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.22.38.3732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion y Humanismo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.22.38.3732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨某教育机构五年级小学生在自然科学领域的演绎推理和归纳推理教学是否能显著提高其学习成绩。方法:采用准实验设计,包括两个完整组(实验组和对照组),采用前测和后测。实验组教授自然科学内容,目的是鼓励演绎推理和归纳推理;对照组教授自然科学内容,但不鼓励演绎推理和归纳推理。结果:通过Kruskal-Wallis测试,观察到实验组有统计学上显著的进展。讨论与结论:研究表明,在自然科学内容教学中运用演绎推理和归纳推理,学生的学习进步显著。如果我们考虑到教师的积极作用,就可以解释这一点,教师通过演绎和归纳推理来寻求学生的认知参与,除了花时间来实践这种推理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enseñanza y aprendizaje del razonamiento deductivo e inductivo a través de las ciencias naturales
Purpose: To identify whether the teaching of deductive and inductive reasoning through natural sciences leads to significant learning progress in fifth-grade primary school students at an Educational Institution. Method: A quasi-experimental design was selected, including two intact groups (an experimental group and a control group) and the use of a pre-test and a post-test. Natural science contents were taught to the experimental group for the purpose of encouraging deductive and inductive reasoning, whereas the same contents were taught to the control group but with no stimulation of deductive and inductive reasoning. Findings: Statistically significant progress was observed in the experimental group, as assessed by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Discussion and Conclusions: The study showed that significant learning progress is achieved when deductive and inductive reasoning is used in natural science content teaching. This can be explained if we consider the active role of the teacher, who sought student cognitive involvement by means of deductive and inductive reasoning, in addition to the time devoted to the practice of such reasoning
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信