{"title":"水环境中微塑料去除技术:系统综述","authors":"Arman Arbabi, Mitra Gholami, Mahdi Farzadkia, Shirin Djalalinia","doi":"10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Pollution of the environment with all kinds of plastics has become a growing problem. The problem of microplastics is mainly due to the absorption of stable organic pollutants and metals into them, and as a result, their environmental toxicity increases. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the appropriate and efficient methods of removing microplastics from aqueous environments through a systematic review.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Present study designed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers followed all process from search to final analysis, for the relevant studies using international databases of PubMed, Scopus and ISI/WOS (Web of Science), without time limit. The search strategy developed based on the main axis of “microplastics”, “aqueous environments” and “removal”. This research was carried out from 2017 until the March of 2022. All relevant observational, analytical studies, review articles, and a meta-analysis were included.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Through a comprehensive systematic search we found 2974 papers, after running the proses of refining, 80 eligible papers included to the study. According to the results of the review, the methods of removing microplastics from aquatic environments were divided to physical (12), chemical (18), physicochemical (27), biological (12) and integrated (11) methods. In different removal methods, the most dominant group of studied microplastics belonged to the four groups of polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene tetra phthalate (PET). Average removal efficiency of microplastics in different processes in each method was as: physical method (73.76%), chemical method (74.38%), physicochemical method (80.44%), biological method (75.23%) and integrated method (88.63%). The highest removal efficiency occurred in the processes based on the integrated method and the lowest efficiency occurred in the physical method. In total, 80% of the studies were conducted on a laboratory scale, 18.75% on a full scale and 1.25% on a pilot scale.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to the findings; different processes based on physical, chemical, physicochemical, biological and integrated methods are able to remove microplastics with high efficiency from aqueous environments and in order to reduce their hazardous effects on health and environment, these processes can be easily used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","volume":"21 2","pages":"463 - 473"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microplastics removal technologies from aqueous environments: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Arman Arbabi, Mitra Gholami, Mahdi Farzadkia, Shirin Djalalinia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Pollution of the environment with all kinds of plastics has become a growing problem. The problem of microplastics is mainly due to the absorption of stable organic pollutants and metals into them, and as a result, their environmental toxicity increases. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the appropriate and efficient methods of removing microplastics from aqueous environments through a systematic review.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Present study designed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers followed all process from search to final analysis, for the relevant studies using international databases of PubMed, Scopus and ISI/WOS (Web of Science), without time limit. The search strategy developed based on the main axis of “microplastics”, “aqueous environments” and “removal”. This research was carried out from 2017 until the March of 2022. All relevant observational, analytical studies, review articles, and a meta-analysis were included.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Through a comprehensive systematic search we found 2974 papers, after running the proses of refining, 80 eligible papers included to the study. According to the results of the review, the methods of removing microplastics from aquatic environments were divided to physical (12), chemical (18), physicochemical (27), biological (12) and integrated (11) methods. In different removal methods, the most dominant group of studied microplastics belonged to the four groups of polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene tetra phthalate (PET). Average removal efficiency of microplastics in different processes in each method was as: physical method (73.76%), chemical method (74.38%), physicochemical method (80.44%), biological method (75.23%) and integrated method (88.63%). The highest removal efficiency occurred in the processes based on the integrated method and the lowest efficiency occurred in the physical method. In total, 80% of the studies were conducted on a laboratory scale, 18.75% on a full scale and 1.25% on a pilot scale.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to the findings; different processes based on physical, chemical, physicochemical, biological and integrated methods are able to remove microplastics with high efficiency from aqueous environments and in order to reduce their hazardous effects on health and environment, these processes can be easily used.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"463 - 473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的各种塑料对环境的污染已经成为一个日益严重的问题。微塑料的问题主要是由于其吸收了稳定的有机污染物和金属,因此其环境毒性增加。本研究的主要目的是通过系统综述,研究从水环境中去除微塑料的适当有效方法。方法本研究按PRISMA指导原则设计。两名独立研究人员使用PubMed、Scopus和ISI/WOS(Web of Science)的国际数据库对相关研究进行了从搜索到最终分析的所有过程,没有时间限制。搜索策略以“微塑料”、“水环境”和“去除”为主轴。这项研究从2017年一直进行到2022年3月。包括所有相关的观察、分析研究、综述文章和荟萃分析。结果通过全面系统的检索,共发现2974篇论文,经过提炼,80篇符合条件的论文纳入本研究。根据综述结果,从水生环境中去除微塑料的方法分为物理(12)、化学(18)、物理化学(27)、生物(12)和综合(11)方法。在不同的去除方法中,所研究的微塑料中最主要的一组属于聚乙烯(PE)、聚苯乙烯(PS)、聚丙烯(PP)和聚对苯二甲酸四酯(PET)四组。不同工艺对微塑料的平均去除率分别为:物理法(73.76%)、化学法(74.38%)、物理化学法(80.44%)、生物法(75.23%)和综合法(88.63%)。总的来说,80%的研究是在实验室规模上进行的,18.75%是在全规模上进行,1.25%是在中试规模上进行。结论根据研究结果;基于物理、化学、物理化学、生物和综合方法的不同工艺能够高效去除水环境中的微塑料,为了减少其对健康和环境的危害,这些工艺可以很容易地使用。
Microplastics removal technologies from aqueous environments: a systematic review
Purpose
Pollution of the environment with all kinds of plastics has become a growing problem. The problem of microplastics is mainly due to the absorption of stable organic pollutants and metals into them, and as a result, their environmental toxicity increases. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the appropriate and efficient methods of removing microplastics from aqueous environments through a systematic review.
Methods
Present study designed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers followed all process from search to final analysis, for the relevant studies using international databases of PubMed, Scopus and ISI/WOS (Web of Science), without time limit. The search strategy developed based on the main axis of “microplastics”, “aqueous environments” and “removal”. This research was carried out from 2017 until the March of 2022. All relevant observational, analytical studies, review articles, and a meta-analysis were included.
Results
Through a comprehensive systematic search we found 2974 papers, after running the proses of refining, 80 eligible papers included to the study. According to the results of the review, the methods of removing microplastics from aquatic environments were divided to physical (12), chemical (18), physicochemical (27), biological (12) and integrated (11) methods. In different removal methods, the most dominant group of studied microplastics belonged to the four groups of polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene tetra phthalate (PET). Average removal efficiency of microplastics in different processes in each method was as: physical method (73.76%), chemical method (74.38%), physicochemical method (80.44%), biological method (75.23%) and integrated method (88.63%). The highest removal efficiency occurred in the processes based on the integrated method and the lowest efficiency occurred in the physical method. In total, 80% of the studies were conducted on a laboratory scale, 18.75% on a full scale and 1.25% on a pilot scale.
Conclusion
According to the findings; different processes based on physical, chemical, physicochemical, biological and integrated methods are able to remove microplastics with high efficiency from aqueous environments and in order to reduce their hazardous effects on health and environment, these processes can be easily used.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering is a peer-reviewed journal presenting timely research on all aspects of environmental health science, engineering and management.
A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes:
-Water pollution and treatment
-Wastewater treatment and reuse
-Air control
-Soil remediation
-Noise and radiation control
-Environmental biotechnology and nanotechnology
-Food safety and hygiene