从数码相机图像预测土壤有机质和土壤含水量:回归和机器学习方法的比较

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE
Perry Taneja, Hitesh B. Vasava, Solmaz Fathololoumi, P. Daggupati, Asim Biswas
{"title":"从数码相机图像预测土壤有机质和土壤含水量:回归和机器学习方法的比较","authors":"Perry Taneja, Hitesh B. Vasava, Solmaz Fathololoumi, P. Daggupati, Asim Biswas","doi":"10.1139/cjss-2021-0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Appropriate soil management maintains and improves the health of the entire ecosystem. Soil appropriate administration necessitates proper characterization of its properties including soil organic matter (SOM) and soil moisture content (SMC). Image-based soil characterization has shown strong potential in comparison with traditional methods. This study compared the performance of 22 different supervised regression and machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVMs), Gaussian process regression (GPR) models, ensembles of trees, and artificial neural network (ANN), in predicting SOM and SMC from soil images taken with a digital camera in the laboratory setting. A total of 22 image parameters were extracted and used as predictor variables in the models in two steps. First models were developed using all 22 extracted features and then using a subset of six best features for both SOM and SMC. Saturation index (redness index) was the most important variable for SOM prediction, and contrast (median S) for SMC prediction, respectively. The color and textural parameters demonstrated a high correlation with both SOM and SMC. Results revealed a satisfactory agreement between the image parameters and the laboratory-measured SOM (R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.74 and 9.80% using cubist) and SMC (R2 and RMSE of 0.86 and 8.79% using random forest) for the validation data set using six predictor variables. Overall, GPR models and tree models (cubist, RF, and boosted trees) best captured and explained the nonlinear relationships between SOM, SMC, and image parameters for this study.","PeriodicalId":9384,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","volume":"102 1","pages":"767 - 784"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting soil organic matter and soil moisture content from digital camera images: comparison of regression and machine learning approaches\",\"authors\":\"Perry Taneja, Hitesh B. Vasava, Solmaz Fathololoumi, P. Daggupati, Asim Biswas\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjss-2021-0133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Appropriate soil management maintains and improves the health of the entire ecosystem. Soil appropriate administration necessitates proper characterization of its properties including soil organic matter (SOM) and soil moisture content (SMC). Image-based soil characterization has shown strong potential in comparison with traditional methods. This study compared the performance of 22 different supervised regression and machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVMs), Gaussian process regression (GPR) models, ensembles of trees, and artificial neural network (ANN), in predicting SOM and SMC from soil images taken with a digital camera in the laboratory setting. A total of 22 image parameters were extracted and used as predictor variables in the models in two steps. First models were developed using all 22 extracted features and then using a subset of six best features for both SOM and SMC. Saturation index (redness index) was the most important variable for SOM prediction, and contrast (median S) for SMC prediction, respectively. The color and textural parameters demonstrated a high correlation with both SOM and SMC. Results revealed a satisfactory agreement between the image parameters and the laboratory-measured SOM (R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.74 and 9.80% using cubist) and SMC (R2 and RMSE of 0.86 and 8.79% using random forest) for the validation data set using six predictor variables. Overall, GPR models and tree models (cubist, RF, and boosted trees) best captured and explained the nonlinear relationships between SOM, SMC, and image parameters for this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"767 - 784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2021-0133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2021-0133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要适当的土壤管理可以维护和改善整个生态系统的健康。适当施用土壤需要对其特性进行适当表征,包括土壤有机质(SOM)和土壤含水量(SMC)。与传统方法相比,基于图像的土壤表征显示出强大的潜力。本研究比较了22种不同的监督回归和机器学习算法,包括支持向量机(SVM)、高斯过程回归(GPR)模型、树集合和人工神经网络(ANN),在实验室环境中从数码相机拍摄的土壤图像中预测SOM和SMC的性能。总共提取了22个图像参数,并分两步用作模型中的预测变量。首先使用所有22个提取的特征来开发模型,然后使用SOM和SMC的六个最佳特征的子集。饱和度指数(红度指数)是SOM预测的最重要变量,对比度(中位数S)分别是SMC预测的最主要变量。颜色和质地参数显示出与SOM和SMC的高度相关性。结果显示,对于使用六个预测变量的验证数据集,图像参数与实验室测量的SOM(R2和均方根误差(RMSE)分别为0.74%和9.80%)和SMC(R2和RMSE分别为0.86%和8.79%)之间存在令人满意的一致性。总体而言,GPR模型和树模型(立体主义、RF和增强树)最好地捕捉和解释了SOM、SMC和图像参数之间的非线性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting soil organic matter and soil moisture content from digital camera images: comparison of regression and machine learning approaches
Abstract Appropriate soil management maintains and improves the health of the entire ecosystem. Soil appropriate administration necessitates proper characterization of its properties including soil organic matter (SOM) and soil moisture content (SMC). Image-based soil characterization has shown strong potential in comparison with traditional methods. This study compared the performance of 22 different supervised regression and machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVMs), Gaussian process regression (GPR) models, ensembles of trees, and artificial neural network (ANN), in predicting SOM and SMC from soil images taken with a digital camera in the laboratory setting. A total of 22 image parameters were extracted and used as predictor variables in the models in two steps. First models were developed using all 22 extracted features and then using a subset of six best features for both SOM and SMC. Saturation index (redness index) was the most important variable for SOM prediction, and contrast (median S) for SMC prediction, respectively. The color and textural parameters demonstrated a high correlation with both SOM and SMC. Results revealed a satisfactory agreement between the image parameters and the laboratory-measured SOM (R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.74 and 9.80% using cubist) and SMC (R2 and RMSE of 0.86 and 8.79% using random forest) for the validation data set using six predictor variables. Overall, GPR models and tree models (cubist, RF, and boosted trees) best captured and explained the nonlinear relationships between SOM, SMC, and image parameters for this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Canadian Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Soil Science is an international peer-reviewed journal published in cooperation with the Canadian Society of Soil Science. The journal publishes original research on the use, management, structure and development of soils and draws from the disciplines of soil science, agrometeorology, ecology, agricultural engineering, environmental science, hydrology, forestry, geology, geography and climatology. Research is published in a number of topic sections including: agrometeorology; ecology, biological processes and plant interactions; composition and chemical processes; physical processes and interfaces; genesis, landscape processes and relationships; contamination and environmental stewardship; and management for agricultural, forestry and urban uses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信