P. Eo, Joon Seok Lee, J. W. Lee, K. Choi, H. Chung, B. Cho, Jeeyeon Lee, H. Park, J. Yang
{"title":"网状手术在直接植入乳房重建术中的应用","authors":"P. Eo, Joon Seok Lee, J. W. Lee, K. Choi, H. Chung, B. Cho, Jeeyeon Lee, H. Park, J. Yang","doi":"10.14730/AAPS.2020.02383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy is becoming more common because it has several advantages. It is a simpler surgical procedure than other methods, such as breast reconstruction using flaps, and it allows faster patient recovery with no additional scars [1]. However, implants are placed below the pectoralis major muscle because complications such as infection, capsular contracture, and explantation are likely to occur when implants are directly exposed [2-5]. After acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was developed in 2005, surgery with inferolateral tissue support has been performed to compensate for the disadvantages of total muscle coverage [6-8]. Despite the advantages of ADM such as good cosmetic outcomes, additional reinforcement, improved implant positioning, and a reduced risk of capsular contracture [9], seroma, infection, and inflammation are possible when ADM is used, and ADM also has the disadvantage of a high cost [10]. Surgery using ADM fenestration is widely performed because previous studies have reported that this technique leads to better cosmetic outcomes, results in fewer complications such as seroma, and stimulates biointegration [11-15]. However, fenestrating ADM during surgery can be cumbersome because the surgeon has to make pores one by Pil Seon Eo, Joon Seok Lee, Jeong Woo Lee, Kang Young Choi, Ho Yun Chung, Byung Chae Cho, Jeeyeon Lee, Ho Yong Park, Jung Dug Yang","PeriodicalId":41514,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of meshed SurgiMend in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"P. Eo, Joon Seok Lee, J. W. Lee, K. Choi, H. Chung, B. Cho, Jeeyeon Lee, H. Park, J. Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.14730/AAPS.2020.02383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy is becoming more common because it has several advantages. It is a simpler surgical procedure than other methods, such as breast reconstruction using flaps, and it allows faster patient recovery with no additional scars [1]. However, implants are placed below the pectoralis major muscle because complications such as infection, capsular contracture, and explantation are likely to occur when implants are directly exposed [2-5]. After acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was developed in 2005, surgery with inferolateral tissue support has been performed to compensate for the disadvantages of total muscle coverage [6-8]. Despite the advantages of ADM such as good cosmetic outcomes, additional reinforcement, improved implant positioning, and a reduced risk of capsular contracture [9], seroma, infection, and inflammation are possible when ADM is used, and ADM also has the disadvantage of a high cost [10]. Surgery using ADM fenestration is widely performed because previous studies have reported that this technique leads to better cosmetic outcomes, results in fewer complications such as seroma, and stimulates biointegration [11-15]. However, fenestrating ADM during surgery can be cumbersome because the surgeon has to make pores one by Pil Seon Eo, Joon Seok Lee, Jeong Woo Lee, Kang Young Choi, Ho Yun Chung, Byung Chae Cho, Jeeyeon Lee, Ho Yong Park, Jung Dug Yang\",\"PeriodicalId\":41514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"69-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14730/AAPS.2020.02383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14730/AAPS.2020.02383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
乳房切除术后基于植入物的乳房重建越来越普遍,因为它有几个优点。这是一种比其他方法更简单的手术方法,例如使用皮瓣进行乳房重建,并且可以更快地恢复患者,而不会留下额外的疤痕[1]。然而,植入物被放置在胸大肌下方,因为当植入物直接暴露时,可能会出现感染、包膜挛缩和外植等并发症[2-5]。2005年开发出脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)后,进行了带下外侧组织支持的手术,以弥补肌肉总覆盖率的不足[6-8]。尽管ADM具有良好的美容效果、额外的加固、改进的植入物定位和降低包膜挛缩风险等优点[9],但当使用ADM时,可能会出现浆膜瘤、感染和炎症,而且ADM还具有成本高的缺点[10]。使用ADM开窗术的手术被广泛进行,因为先前的研究报道,这种技术可以带来更好的美容效果,减少血清瘤等并发症,并刺激生物整合[11-15]。然而,在手术中开窗ADM可能很麻烦,因为外科医生必须由Pil Seon Eo、Joon Seok Lee、Jeong Woo Lee、Kang Young Choi、Ho Yun Chung、Byung Chae Cho、Jeeyeon Lee、Ho Yong Park、Jung Dug Yang
Usefulness of meshed SurgiMend in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy is becoming more common because it has several advantages. It is a simpler surgical procedure than other methods, such as breast reconstruction using flaps, and it allows faster patient recovery with no additional scars [1]. However, implants are placed below the pectoralis major muscle because complications such as infection, capsular contracture, and explantation are likely to occur when implants are directly exposed [2-5]. After acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was developed in 2005, surgery with inferolateral tissue support has been performed to compensate for the disadvantages of total muscle coverage [6-8]. Despite the advantages of ADM such as good cosmetic outcomes, additional reinforcement, improved implant positioning, and a reduced risk of capsular contracture [9], seroma, infection, and inflammation are possible when ADM is used, and ADM also has the disadvantage of a high cost [10]. Surgery using ADM fenestration is widely performed because previous studies have reported that this technique leads to better cosmetic outcomes, results in fewer complications such as seroma, and stimulates biointegration [11-15]. However, fenestrating ADM during surgery can be cumbersome because the surgeon has to make pores one by Pil Seon Eo, Joon Seok Lee, Jeong Woo Lee, Kang Young Choi, Ho Yun Chung, Byung Chae Cho, Jeeyeon Lee, Ho Yong Park, Jung Dug Yang