公平准入、地点、资金以及与德克萨斯州天才项目绩效评级的一致性

IF 1.2 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jaret Hodges, Kacey Crutchfield, L. Lee
{"title":"公平准入、地点、资金以及与德克萨斯州天才项目绩效评级的一致性","authors":"Jaret Hodges, Kacey Crutchfield, L. Lee","doi":"10.1177/0162353220978306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-assessments utilizing designated, objective standards are critical in program evaluation. Although 2013–2014 Texas policy mandated districts self-assess their gifted programs using the community and student engagement performance rating system, little is known about how districts determined their self-assessment ratings. Following gifted program evaluation guidelines from the Texas State Plan for Gifted/Talented Students and the National Association for Gifted Children Pre-K–Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards, researchers used logistic ordered regression to examine Texas districts’ 2014–2015 locale, proportional representation, and budgetary allotments in relation to gifted program self-assessed performance ratings. Results indicate proportional representation of Black and Hispanic students in gifted programs did not influence school district self-assessed ratings. On the contrary, locale, proportion of Black and Hispanic students to the overall district population, and budget allocation did relate to self-assessed ratings of gifted programs. Future research directions and implications for the use of self-assessments within gifted program evaluation are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51648,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED","volume":"44 1","pages":"3 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0162353220978306","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equitable Access, Locale, Funding, and the Alignment to Performance Ratings in Texas Gifted Programs\",\"authors\":\"Jaret Hodges, Kacey Crutchfield, L. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0162353220978306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Self-assessments utilizing designated, objective standards are critical in program evaluation. Although 2013–2014 Texas policy mandated districts self-assess their gifted programs using the community and student engagement performance rating system, little is known about how districts determined their self-assessment ratings. Following gifted program evaluation guidelines from the Texas State Plan for Gifted/Talented Students and the National Association for Gifted Children Pre-K–Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards, researchers used logistic ordered regression to examine Texas districts’ 2014–2015 locale, proportional representation, and budgetary allotments in relation to gifted program self-assessed performance ratings. Results indicate proportional representation of Black and Hispanic students in gifted programs did not influence school district self-assessed ratings. On the contrary, locale, proportion of Black and Hispanic students to the overall district population, and budget allocation did relate to self-assessed ratings of gifted programs. Future research directions and implications for the use of self-assessments within gifted program evaluation are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0162353220978306\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220978306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220978306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

利用指定的客观标准进行自我评估在项目评估中至关重要。尽管2013-2014年德克萨斯州的政策要求学区使用社区和学生参与绩效评级系统对他们的资优项目进行自我评估,但人们对学区如何确定他们的自我评估评级知之甚少。根据《德州资优学生计划》和《全国资优儿童协会学前12年级资优项目标准》的资优项目评估指南,研究人员使用逻辑有序回归分析了德州各学区2014-2015年的地区、比例代表和与资优项目自我评估绩效评级相关的预算分配情况。结果表明,黑人和西班牙裔学生在资优项目中的比例代表并不影响学区自评评分。相反,地区、黑人和西班牙裔学生占整个地区人口的比例以及预算分配确实与资优项目的自我评估评级有关。讨论了资优项目评估中自我评估的未来研究方向和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equitable Access, Locale, Funding, and the Alignment to Performance Ratings in Texas Gifted Programs
Self-assessments utilizing designated, objective standards are critical in program evaluation. Although 2013–2014 Texas policy mandated districts self-assess their gifted programs using the community and student engagement performance rating system, little is known about how districts determined their self-assessment ratings. Following gifted program evaluation guidelines from the Texas State Plan for Gifted/Talented Students and the National Association for Gifted Children Pre-K–Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards, researchers used logistic ordered regression to examine Texas districts’ 2014–2015 locale, proportional representation, and budgetary allotments in relation to gifted program self-assessed performance ratings. Results indicate proportional representation of Black and Hispanic students in gifted programs did not influence school district self-assessed ratings. On the contrary, locale, proportion of Black and Hispanic students to the overall district population, and budget allocation did relate to self-assessed ratings of gifted programs. Future research directions and implications for the use of self-assessments within gifted program evaluation are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信