{"title":"加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的低风险标准化考试:系统问责制和/或个人反馈?","authors":"Sergei Filiasov, Arthur Sweetman","doi":"10.1080/09645292.2022.2091113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A jurisdiction-wide zero-stakes Foundational Skills Assessment administered in grade 4 in British Columbia, Canada, used a three-point scale to publicly disseminate aggregate school/district-level results, and a five-point scale to convey results to students/parents. For a variety of long-term outcomes, a regression discontinuity analysis shows a positive, but modest in magnitude, ‘system accountability’ effect for girls who fall just below the lowest threshold on the three-point scale for reading. For numeracy the findings are less precise but suggest a positive ‘feedback effect’ for girls who fall just below the highest five-point scale cut-off. No statistically significant effects are observed for boys.","PeriodicalId":46682,"journal":{"name":"Education Economics","volume":"31 1","pages":"145 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-stakes standardized tests in British Columbia, Canada: system accountability and/or individual feedback?\",\"authors\":\"Sergei Filiasov, Arthur Sweetman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09645292.2022.2091113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A jurisdiction-wide zero-stakes Foundational Skills Assessment administered in grade 4 in British Columbia, Canada, used a three-point scale to publicly disseminate aggregate school/district-level results, and a five-point scale to convey results to students/parents. For a variety of long-term outcomes, a regression discontinuity analysis shows a positive, but modest in magnitude, ‘system accountability’ effect for girls who fall just below the lowest threshold on the three-point scale for reading. For numeracy the findings are less precise but suggest a positive ‘feedback effect’ for girls who fall just below the highest five-point scale cut-off. No statistically significant effects are observed for boys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Economics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2091113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2091113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low-stakes standardized tests in British Columbia, Canada: system accountability and/or individual feedback?
ABSTRACT A jurisdiction-wide zero-stakes Foundational Skills Assessment administered in grade 4 in British Columbia, Canada, used a three-point scale to publicly disseminate aggregate school/district-level results, and a five-point scale to convey results to students/parents. For a variety of long-term outcomes, a regression discontinuity analysis shows a positive, but modest in magnitude, ‘system accountability’ effect for girls who fall just below the lowest threshold on the three-point scale for reading. For numeracy the findings are less precise but suggest a positive ‘feedback effect’ for girls who fall just below the highest five-point scale cut-off. No statistically significant effects are observed for boys.
期刊介绍:
Education Economics is a peer-reviewed journal serving as a forum for debate in all areas of the economics and management of education. Particular emphasis is given to the "quantitative" aspects of educational management which involve numerate disciplines such as economics and operational research. The content is of international appeal and is not limited to material of a technical nature. Applied work with clear policy implications is especially encouraged. Readership of the journal includes academics in the field of education, economics and management; civil servants and local government officials responsible for education and manpower planning; educational managers at the level of the individual school or college.