“每个人都应该参与”:对公园跑步志愿者和冲突动机的定性研究

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
R. Hallett, K. Gombert, M. Hurley
{"title":"“每个人都应该参与”:对公园跑步志愿者和冲突动机的定性研究","authors":"R. Hallett, K. Gombert, M. Hurley","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2020.1760996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study looks at volunteering at parkrun, a weekly 5 k run/walk event held at almost 2,000 different locations worldwide, which relies on volunteers. Despite large numbers of parkrunners, and an ethos encouraging occasional volunteering, some parkrunners do not volunteer which can lead to recruitment difficulties for events. Ten parkrunners were interviewed about volunteering to explore why there might be reluctance. Data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis, and three interlinked themes found: becoming “hooked” on parkrun, “obligation to give back”, and “reluctance to miss a run”. Conflict between obligation and a desire to run or walk led to strategic volunteering to facilitate both, despite this approach potentially challenging event delivery by leaving non-run/walk roles uncovered. Findings indicate a complex and somewhat conflicting system of preference, intrapersonal and structural constraints, mutual aid, and social exchange. Gamification and the triggering of reward mechanisms may be increasing motivation to run rather than volunteer.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"33 1","pages":"493 - 515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1760996","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Everyone Should Muck In”: A Qualitative Study of parkrun Volunteering and Conflicting Motivations\",\"authors\":\"R. Hallett, K. Gombert, M. Hurley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10495142.2020.1760996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study looks at volunteering at parkrun, a weekly 5 k run/walk event held at almost 2,000 different locations worldwide, which relies on volunteers. Despite large numbers of parkrunners, and an ethos encouraging occasional volunteering, some parkrunners do not volunteer which can lead to recruitment difficulties for events. Ten parkrunners were interviewed about volunteering to explore why there might be reluctance. Data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis, and three interlinked themes found: becoming “hooked” on parkrun, “obligation to give back”, and “reluctance to miss a run”. Conflict between obligation and a desire to run or walk led to strategic volunteering to facilitate both, despite this approach potentially challenging event delivery by leaving non-run/walk roles uncovered. Findings indicate a complex and somewhat conflicting system of preference, intrapersonal and structural constraints, mutual aid, and social exchange. Gamification and the triggering of reward mechanisms may be increasing motivation to run rather than volunteer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"493 - 515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1760996\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1760996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1760996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要本研究着眼于在跑酷活动中做志愿者,跑酷活动是一项每周在全球近2000个不同地点举行的5公里跑步/步行活动,依靠志愿者。尽管有大量的公园跑步者,而且有一种鼓励偶尔做志愿者的风气,但一些公园跑步者并不做志愿者,这可能会导致活动的招募困难。十名公园跑步者接受了关于志愿服务的采访,以探究为什么会有人不情愿。使用主题分析对数据进行转录和分析,发现了三个相互关联的主题:对公园跑步“着迷”、“有义务回馈”和“不愿错过跑步”。跑步或步行的义务和愿望之间的冲突导致了战略性的志愿服务,以促进两者的发展,尽管这种方法可能会对活动的交付带来挑战,因为没有涉及非跑步/步行的角色。研究结果表明,偏好、内部和结构约束、互助和社会交流是一个复杂且有点冲突的系统。游戏化和奖励机制的触发可能会增加跑步的动机,而不是志愿者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Everyone Should Muck In”: A Qualitative Study of parkrun Volunteering and Conflicting Motivations
ABSTRACT This study looks at volunteering at parkrun, a weekly 5 k run/walk event held at almost 2,000 different locations worldwide, which relies on volunteers. Despite large numbers of parkrunners, and an ethos encouraging occasional volunteering, some parkrunners do not volunteer which can lead to recruitment difficulties for events. Ten parkrunners were interviewed about volunteering to explore why there might be reluctance. Data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis, and three interlinked themes found: becoming “hooked” on parkrun, “obligation to give back”, and “reluctance to miss a run”. Conflict between obligation and a desire to run or walk led to strategic volunteering to facilitate both, despite this approach potentially challenging event delivery by leaving non-run/walk roles uncovered. Findings indicate a complex and somewhat conflicting system of preference, intrapersonal and structural constraints, mutual aid, and social exchange. Gamification and the triggering of reward mechanisms may be increasing motivation to run rather than volunteer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信