过去的是序幕:对教师教育和特殊教育的圣人思考

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Melinda M. Leko, C. Griffin, T. Ulrich
{"title":"过去的是序幕:对教师教育和特殊教育的圣人思考","authors":"Melinda M. Leko, C. Griffin, T. Ulrich","doi":"10.1177/0888406419900689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Special Issue, we proudly showcase five articles that reflect on the past and look toward the future across a number of critical issues in teacher education and special education. This special issue also serves as our inaugural project as new Teacher Education and Special Education (TESE) editors. We invited “Sages” (i.e., well-respected, senior-level members) from the Teacher Education Division (TED) community to author articles that include historical perspectives and future considerations pertaining to a topic. We directed each Sage to create a writing team, inclusive of one or more early career scholars, with the intent to leverage multigenerational perspectives about several contemporary issues within the field of teacher education and special education. The topics we identified certainly do not represent an exhaustive account of the myriad of pressing issues, trends, and unanswered questions facing the field, as there are too many to include in one special issue; rather our aim was to put forth a collection of articles that, when taken together, represent broad fields of study that have been, and continue to be, critical to advancing the scholarship in teacher education and special education, and most importantly, improving outcomes for students with disabilities and their families. In particular, these topics have remained fundamental to scholarly and practical pursuits within teacher education and special education across time, despite shifts in social, political, and economic contexts. Given the Office of Special Education Programs’ vision for Results-Driven Accountability and shift from compliance to improving results for all students with disabilities, as well as the recent U.S. Supreme Court unanimous decision in Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District, special education must do more to ensure that students with disabilities achieve beyond minimum expectations and meet challenging and worthwhile objectives. Important work has begun and holds promise for addressing these goals, such as the development of multitiered systems of support, high-leverage and evidence-based practices, and efforts to improve both general and special education teacher knowledge of and skill in using effective programs and practices for students with disabilities. The notion of early intervention and prevention in its broadest sense is relevant to these efforts suggesting not only the importance of identifying difficulties and intervening early in a child’s life, but also the benefits of prevention across the lifespan as students with disabilities encounter barriers during childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood. Yet, declining enrollment in traditional teacher preparation programs, rising teacher attrition and PK-12 student enrollment, and an aging teacher workforce have contributed to the widely reported teacher shortages across the United States. We also acknowledge the critical need to address the lack of diversity within the predominantly White, middle class, female, cisgender, monolingual, able-bodied teacher workforce. Relatedly, continued research is needed to address inequitable outcomes in terms of teacher quality and student achievement in “hard-to-staff” schools that are often underresourced, located in urban or rural areas, and serve large numbers of students from marginalized groups. Promising practices, such as partnerships between college and university preparation programs and school districts, and data collected by States for monitoring these variables, are important for identifying effective ways to recruit and prepare new teachers, retain them, and ultimately, support students with or at risk for disabilities to achieve to 900689 TESXXX10.1177/0888406419900689Teacher Education and Special EducationEditorial editorial2020","PeriodicalId":51596,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0888406419900689","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s Past Is Prologue: Sage Reflections on Teacher Education and Special Education\",\"authors\":\"Melinda M. Leko, C. Griffin, T. Ulrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0888406419900689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this Special Issue, we proudly showcase five articles that reflect on the past and look toward the future across a number of critical issues in teacher education and special education. This special issue also serves as our inaugural project as new Teacher Education and Special Education (TESE) editors. We invited “Sages” (i.e., well-respected, senior-level members) from the Teacher Education Division (TED) community to author articles that include historical perspectives and future considerations pertaining to a topic. We directed each Sage to create a writing team, inclusive of one or more early career scholars, with the intent to leverage multigenerational perspectives about several contemporary issues within the field of teacher education and special education. The topics we identified certainly do not represent an exhaustive account of the myriad of pressing issues, trends, and unanswered questions facing the field, as there are too many to include in one special issue; rather our aim was to put forth a collection of articles that, when taken together, represent broad fields of study that have been, and continue to be, critical to advancing the scholarship in teacher education and special education, and most importantly, improving outcomes for students with disabilities and their families. In particular, these topics have remained fundamental to scholarly and practical pursuits within teacher education and special education across time, despite shifts in social, political, and economic contexts. Given the Office of Special Education Programs’ vision for Results-Driven Accountability and shift from compliance to improving results for all students with disabilities, as well as the recent U.S. Supreme Court unanimous decision in Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District, special education must do more to ensure that students with disabilities achieve beyond minimum expectations and meet challenging and worthwhile objectives. Important work has begun and holds promise for addressing these goals, such as the development of multitiered systems of support, high-leverage and evidence-based practices, and efforts to improve both general and special education teacher knowledge of and skill in using effective programs and practices for students with disabilities. The notion of early intervention and prevention in its broadest sense is relevant to these efforts suggesting not only the importance of identifying difficulties and intervening early in a child’s life, but also the benefits of prevention across the lifespan as students with disabilities encounter barriers during childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood. Yet, declining enrollment in traditional teacher preparation programs, rising teacher attrition and PK-12 student enrollment, and an aging teacher workforce have contributed to the widely reported teacher shortages across the United States. We also acknowledge the critical need to address the lack of diversity within the predominantly White, middle class, female, cisgender, monolingual, able-bodied teacher workforce. Relatedly, continued research is needed to address inequitable outcomes in terms of teacher quality and student achievement in “hard-to-staff” schools that are often underresourced, located in urban or rural areas, and serve large numbers of students from marginalized groups. Promising practices, such as partnerships between college and university preparation programs and school districts, and data collected by States for monitoring these variables, are important for identifying effective ways to recruit and prepare new teachers, retain them, and ultimately, support students with or at risk for disabilities to achieve to 900689 TESXXX10.1177/0888406419900689Teacher Education and Special EducationEditorial editorial2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":51596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teacher Education and Special Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0888406419900689\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teacher Education and Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419900689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419900689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本期特刊中,我们自豪地展示了五篇文章,这些文章回顾了教师教育和特殊教育中的一些关键问题,并展望了未来。这期特刊也是我们作为新的教师教育和特殊教育(TESE)编辑的首个项目。我们邀请了来自教师教育部(TED)社区的“贤者”(即备受尊敬的高级成员)撰写文章,其中包括与某个主题相关的历史观点和未来考虑。我们指导每位Sage创建一个写作团队,包括一名或多名早期职业学者,旨在利用多代人对教师教育和特殊教育领域几个当代问题的观点。我们确定的主题当然不能详尽地说明该领域面临的无数紧迫问题、趋势和未回答的问题,因为太多了,无法纳入一个特刊;相反,我们的目标是提出一系列文章,这些文章汇集在一起,代表了广泛的研究领域,这些领域一直是并将继续是提高教师教育和特殊教育奖学金的关键,最重要的是,改善残疾学生及其家庭的成绩。特别是,尽管社会、政治和经济背景发生了变化,但这些主题始终是教师教育和特殊教育中学术和实践追求的基础。鉴于特殊教育项目办公室对结果驱动的问责制的愿景,以及从遵守到改善所有残疾学生成绩的转变,以及美国最高法院最近在Endrew F.诉道格拉斯县学区案中的一致裁决,特殊教育必须采取更多措施,确保残疾学生取得超出最低期望的成绩,实现具有挑战性和有价值的目标。重要的工作已经开始,并有望实现这些目标,例如发展多层支持系统、高杠杆率和循证实践,以及努力提高普通教育和特殊教育教师对残疾学生使用有效计划和实践的知识和技能。最广泛意义上的早期干预和预防概念与这些努力相关,这不仅表明了在儿童生活的早期识别困难和进行干预的重要性,而且表明了在残疾学生在童年、青春期和成年期间遇到障碍时,预防在其一生中的好处。然而,传统教师预备项目的入学人数下降,教师流失和PK-12学生入学人数增加,以及教师队伍老龄化,导致了美国各地广泛报道的教师短缺。我们还认识到,迫切需要解决以白人、中产阶级、女性、顺性别、单语、身体健全的教师队伍中缺乏多样性的问题。与此相关的是,需要继续进行研究,以解决“难以配备员工”的学校在教师质量和学生成绩方面的不公平结果,这些学校往往资源不足,位于城市或农村地区,为大量边缘化群体的学生服务。有希望的做法,如学院和大学预科项目与学区之间的伙伴关系,以及各州为监测这些变量而收集的数据,对于确定招聘和准备新教师、留住他们的有效方法至关重要,支持有残疾或有残疾风险的学生达到900689 TESXXX10.1177/0888406419900689教师教育和特殊教育编辑编辑2020
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What’s Past Is Prologue: Sage Reflections on Teacher Education and Special Education
In this Special Issue, we proudly showcase five articles that reflect on the past and look toward the future across a number of critical issues in teacher education and special education. This special issue also serves as our inaugural project as new Teacher Education and Special Education (TESE) editors. We invited “Sages” (i.e., well-respected, senior-level members) from the Teacher Education Division (TED) community to author articles that include historical perspectives and future considerations pertaining to a topic. We directed each Sage to create a writing team, inclusive of one or more early career scholars, with the intent to leverage multigenerational perspectives about several contemporary issues within the field of teacher education and special education. The topics we identified certainly do not represent an exhaustive account of the myriad of pressing issues, trends, and unanswered questions facing the field, as there are too many to include in one special issue; rather our aim was to put forth a collection of articles that, when taken together, represent broad fields of study that have been, and continue to be, critical to advancing the scholarship in teacher education and special education, and most importantly, improving outcomes for students with disabilities and their families. In particular, these topics have remained fundamental to scholarly and practical pursuits within teacher education and special education across time, despite shifts in social, political, and economic contexts. Given the Office of Special Education Programs’ vision for Results-Driven Accountability and shift from compliance to improving results for all students with disabilities, as well as the recent U.S. Supreme Court unanimous decision in Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District, special education must do more to ensure that students with disabilities achieve beyond minimum expectations and meet challenging and worthwhile objectives. Important work has begun and holds promise for addressing these goals, such as the development of multitiered systems of support, high-leverage and evidence-based practices, and efforts to improve both general and special education teacher knowledge of and skill in using effective programs and practices for students with disabilities. The notion of early intervention and prevention in its broadest sense is relevant to these efforts suggesting not only the importance of identifying difficulties and intervening early in a child’s life, but also the benefits of prevention across the lifespan as students with disabilities encounter barriers during childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood. Yet, declining enrollment in traditional teacher preparation programs, rising teacher attrition and PK-12 student enrollment, and an aging teacher workforce have contributed to the widely reported teacher shortages across the United States. We also acknowledge the critical need to address the lack of diversity within the predominantly White, middle class, female, cisgender, monolingual, able-bodied teacher workforce. Relatedly, continued research is needed to address inequitable outcomes in terms of teacher quality and student achievement in “hard-to-staff” schools that are often underresourced, located in urban or rural areas, and serve large numbers of students from marginalized groups. Promising practices, such as partnerships between college and university preparation programs and school districts, and data collected by States for monitoring these variables, are important for identifying effective ways to recruit and prepare new teachers, retain them, and ultimately, support students with or at risk for disabilities to achieve to 900689 TESXXX10.1177/0888406419900689Teacher Education and Special EducationEditorial editorial2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Education and Special Education
Teacher Education and Special Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信