用预测叙述检验投资预测效率

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Alexander Foltas
{"title":"用预测叙述检验投资预测效率","authors":"Alexander Foltas","doi":"10.1515/jbnst-2020-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract I analyze the narratives that accompany business cycle forecasting reports of three German institutes using topic models. To this end, I gather multiple similar topics into different economic subject categories, allowing me to map shifting prioritizations within and between these subjects. Subsequently, I examine whether forecasting narratives contain additional information not captured by traditional indicators and include them in a random forest-based investment-forecast efficiency analysis. I find multiple correlations between narratives and forecast errors and conclude that forecasters inefficiently incorporate qualitative information in these cases. I raise the idea that further investigations with more precise identification of forecasting narratives could improve qualitative information processing or lead to scientific guidelines for forecast adjustments.","PeriodicalId":45967,"journal":{"name":"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik","volume":"242 1","pages":"191 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Investment Forecast Efficiency with Forecasting Narratives\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Foltas\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jbnst-2020-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract I analyze the narratives that accompany business cycle forecasting reports of three German institutes using topic models. To this end, I gather multiple similar topics into different economic subject categories, allowing me to map shifting prioritizations within and between these subjects. Subsequently, I examine whether forecasting narratives contain additional information not captured by traditional indicators and include them in a random forest-based investment-forecast efficiency analysis. I find multiple correlations between narratives and forecast errors and conclude that forecasters inefficiently incorporate qualitative information in these cases. I raise the idea that further investigations with more precise identification of forecasting narratives could improve qualitative information processing or lead to scientific guidelines for forecast adjustments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik\",\"volume\":\"242 1\",\"pages\":\"191 - 222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2020-0027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2020-0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文运用主题模型对德国三家研究机构的经济周期预测报告进行分析。为此,我将多个类似的主题收集到不同的经济主题类别中,使我能够在这些主题内部和之间映射变化的优先级。随后,我研究了预测叙述是否包含传统指标未捕获的额外信息,并将其纳入基于随机森林的投资预测效率分析。我发现叙述和预测错误之间存在多重相关性,并得出结论,在这些情况下,预测者无法有效地整合定性信息。我提出这样一种观点,即对预测叙述进行更精确识别的进一步调查可以改善定性信息处理,或为预测调整提供科学指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing Investment Forecast Efficiency with Forecasting Narratives
Abstract I analyze the narratives that accompany business cycle forecasting reports of three German institutes using topic models. To this end, I gather multiple similar topics into different economic subject categories, allowing me to map shifting prioritizations within and between these subjects. Subsequently, I examine whether forecasting narratives contain additional information not captured by traditional indicators and include them in a random forest-based investment-forecast efficiency analysis. I find multiple correlations between narratives and forecast errors and conclude that forecasters inefficiently incorporate qualitative information in these cases. I raise the idea that further investigations with more precise identification of forecasting narratives could improve qualitative information processing or lead to scientific guidelines for forecast adjustments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
23.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Die Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik existieren seit dem Jahr 1863. Die Herausgeber fühlen sich der Tradition verpflichtet, die Zeitschrift für kritische, innovative und entwicklungsträchtige Beiträge offen zu halten. Weder thematisch noch methodisch sollen die Veröffentlichungen auf jeweils herrschende Lehrmeinungen eingeengt werden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信