善的经济:经济生活方式的仁爱与道德

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
R. Her
{"title":"善的经济:经济生活方式的仁爱与道德","authors":"R. Her","doi":"10.1080/23729988.2019.1639455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Looking back in history, humans have put in much effort in making profit distribution fair: the outcome for Adam Smith’s proposition of maximising self-interest became public welfare in the end, which led to severe exploitation of the classes; Stalinist communism asserted that government should control distribution, which resulted in bureaucratic bureaucrat; Weber’s calling of the sagely hero, the entrepreneur, the actualisation of which has caused many imperialist expansions of capitalist enterprises; Hayek’s laissez-faire system, which resulted in Austria’s economic depression and high unemployment rate; and Schumpeter’s bureaucratic specialised management, where we see senior management gobbling up huge amounts of investors’ capital at Wall Street. Can Marx’s ideal of the proletariat’s dictatorship emerging from highly capitalist society ever be fulfilled? Hundreds and thousands of social entrepreneurs are now dedicated to solving social problems. They do this on the basis of benevolent motivations (not seeking person gain) and moral goals (not seeking the expansion of individual or organisation). Social enterprise is only the beginning for an ‘economy of goodness’ and ‘moral economy,’ not the end. If even more commercial corporations and for-profit enterprises could base their operational philosophy on benevolence and morality, it would have a historically profound and far-reaching impact on socio-economic impartiality and justice.","PeriodicalId":36684,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Chinese Religions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23729988.2019.1639455","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economy of goodness: the benevolence and morality of economic lifestyle\",\"authors\":\"R. Her\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23729988.2019.1639455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Looking back in history, humans have put in much effort in making profit distribution fair: the outcome for Adam Smith’s proposition of maximising self-interest became public welfare in the end, which led to severe exploitation of the classes; Stalinist communism asserted that government should control distribution, which resulted in bureaucratic bureaucrat; Weber’s calling of the sagely hero, the entrepreneur, the actualisation of which has caused many imperialist expansions of capitalist enterprises; Hayek’s laissez-faire system, which resulted in Austria’s economic depression and high unemployment rate; and Schumpeter’s bureaucratic specialised management, where we see senior management gobbling up huge amounts of investors’ capital at Wall Street. Can Marx’s ideal of the proletariat’s dictatorship emerging from highly capitalist society ever be fulfilled? Hundreds and thousands of social entrepreneurs are now dedicated to solving social problems. They do this on the basis of benevolent motivations (not seeking person gain) and moral goals (not seeking the expansion of individual or organisation). Social enterprise is only the beginning for an ‘economy of goodness’ and ‘moral economy,’ not the end. If even more commercial corporations and for-profit enterprises could base their operational philosophy on benevolence and morality, it would have a historically profound and far-reaching impact on socio-economic impartiality and justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Chinese Religions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23729988.2019.1639455\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Chinese Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1095\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23729988.2019.1639455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23729988.2019.1639455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾历史,人类为实现利润的公平分配付出了巨大的努力:亚当·斯密的利己主义最大化主张最终变成了公共福利,导致了对阶级的严重剥削;斯大林共产主义主张政府应该控制分配,这导致了官僚主义;韦伯对英明英雄——企业家的召唤,这种召唤的实现导致了许多资本主义企业的帝国主义扩张;哈耶克的自由放任主义,导致奥地利经济萧条和高失业率;以及熊彼特的官僚专业化管理,我们看到华尔街的高级管理层吞噬了投资者的巨额资金。马克思关于无产阶级专政产生于高度资本主义社会的理想能否实现?现在有成千上万的社会企业家致力于解决社会问题。他们这样做是基于仁慈的动机(不寻求个人利益)和道德目标(不寻求个人或组织的扩张)。社会企业只是“善良经济”和“道德经济”的开端,而不是终点。如果更多的商业公司和营利性企业能够将其经营理念建立在仁爱和道德之上,这将对社会经济的公平与正义产生历史性的深远影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economy of goodness: the benevolence and morality of economic lifestyle
ABSTRACT Looking back in history, humans have put in much effort in making profit distribution fair: the outcome for Adam Smith’s proposition of maximising self-interest became public welfare in the end, which led to severe exploitation of the classes; Stalinist communism asserted that government should control distribution, which resulted in bureaucratic bureaucrat; Weber’s calling of the sagely hero, the entrepreneur, the actualisation of which has caused many imperialist expansions of capitalist enterprises; Hayek’s laissez-faire system, which resulted in Austria’s economic depression and high unemployment rate; and Schumpeter’s bureaucratic specialised management, where we see senior management gobbling up huge amounts of investors’ capital at Wall Street. Can Marx’s ideal of the proletariat’s dictatorship emerging from highly capitalist society ever be fulfilled? Hundreds and thousands of social entrepreneurs are now dedicated to solving social problems. They do this on the basis of benevolent motivations (not seeking person gain) and moral goals (not seeking the expansion of individual or organisation). Social enterprise is only the beginning for an ‘economy of goodness’ and ‘moral economy,’ not the end. If even more commercial corporations and for-profit enterprises could base their operational philosophy on benevolence and morality, it would have a historically profound and far-reaching impact on socio-economic impartiality and justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Chinese Religions
Studies in Chinese Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信