追求公平:特殊教育的不成比例和解决系统不平等的技术解决方案的重构

IF 2.4 1区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Review of Research in Education Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.3102/0091732X16686947

Catherine Kramarczuk Voulgarides, Edward Fergus, Kathleen A. King Thorius

{"title":"追求公平:特殊教育的不成比例和解决系统不平等的技术解决方案的重构","authors":"Catherine Kramarczuk Voulgarides, Edward Fergus, Kathleen A. King Thorius","doi":"10.3102/0091732X16686947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the review, we examine what is known about disproportionality with the intention of informing the direction of policy and practice remedies. We outline the definition, contours, and characteristics of disproportionality and examine some of the prevailing explanations as to why the issue persists. We then pivot the review to consider how policy, through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), has sought to address disproportionality in special education and disciplining of students with disabilities. We question why a legally sound civil rights law like IDEA has been unable to abate disproportionality for nearly 40 years. We then turn our attention to review interventions embedded in IDEA that have been recommended to address disproportionality and question why they have not improved outcomes for “nondominant” students in special education. We conclude with some recommendations for disrupting disproportionality.","PeriodicalId":47753,"journal":{"name":"Review of Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3102/0091732X16686947","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pursuing Equity: Disproportionality in Special Education and the Reframing of Technical Solutions to Address Systemic Inequities\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Kramarczuk Voulgarides, Edward Fergus, Kathleen A. King Thorius\",\"doi\":\"10.3102/0091732X16686947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the review, we examine what is known about disproportionality with the intention of informing the direction of policy and practice remedies. We outline the definition, contours, and characteristics of disproportionality and examine some of the prevailing explanations as to why the issue persists. We then pivot the review to consider how policy, through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), has sought to address disproportionality in special education and disciplining of students with disabilities. We question why a legally sound civil rights law like IDEA has been unable to abate disproportionality for nearly 40 years. We then turn our attention to review interventions embedded in IDEA that have been recommended to address disproportionality and question why they have not improved outcomes for “nondominant” students in special education. We conclude with some recommendations for disrupting disproportionality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Research in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3102/0091732X16686947\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686947\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686947","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 34

摘要

在审查中，我们检查什么是已知的不均衡的意图通知政策和实践补救方向。我们概述了歧化的定义、轮廓和特征，并研究了一些关于问题持续存在的普遍解释。然后，我们将审查重点转向考虑政策如何通过《残疾人教育法》(IDEA)寻求解决特殊教育和残疾学生纪律方面的不成比例问题。我们质疑为什么像IDEA这样法律上健全的民权法在近40年的时间里一直无法减少性别比例失调。然后，我们将注意力转向回顾IDEA中嵌入的干预措施，这些干预措施被推荐用于解决比例失调问题，并质疑为什么它们没有改善特殊教育中“非优势”学生的结果。最后，我们提出了一些破坏歧化的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Pursuing Equity: Disproportionality in Special Education and the Reframing of Technical Solutions to Address Systemic Inequities

In the review, we examine what is known about disproportionality with the intention of informing the direction of policy and practice remedies. We outline the definition, contours, and characteristics of disproportionality and examine some of the prevailing explanations as to why the issue persists. We then pivot the review to consider how policy, through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), has sought to address disproportionality in special education and disciplining of students with disabilities. We question why a legally sound civil rights law like IDEA has been unable to abate disproportionality for nearly 40 years. We then turn our attention to review interventions embedded in IDEA that have been recommended to address disproportionality and question why they have not improved outcomes for “nondominant” students in special education. We conclude with some recommendations for disrupting disproportionality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Review of Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

15.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Review of Research in Education (RRE), published annually since 1973 (approximately 416 pp./volume year), provides an overview and descriptive analysis of selected topics of relevant research literature through critical and synthesizing essays. Articles are usually solicited for specific RRE issues. There may also be calls for papers. RRE promotes discussion and controversy about research problems in addition to pulling together and summarizing the work in a field.