与人工智能合作:数字生产力助理案例

IF 2.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand Pub Date : 2022-09-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/03036758.2022.2114507
Jocelyn Cranefield, Michael Winikoff, Yi-Te Chiu, Yevgeniya Li, Cathal Doyle, Alex Richter
{"title":"与人工智能合作:数字生产力助理案例","authors":"Jocelyn Cranefield, Michael Winikoff, Yi-Te Chiu, Yevgeniya Li, Cathal Doyle, Alex Richter","doi":"10.1080/03036758.2022.2114507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An emerging class of intelligent tools that we term Digital Productivity Assistants (DPAs) is designed to help workers improve their productivity and keep their work-life balance in check. Using personalised work-based analytics it raises awareness of individual collaboration behaviour and suggests improvements to work practices. The purpose of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the role of personalised work-based analytics in the context of (improving) individual productivity and work-life balance. We present an interpretive case study based on interviews with 28 workers who face high job demands and job variety and our own observations. Our study contributes to the still ongoing sensemaking of AI, by illustrating how DPAs can co-regulate human work through technology affordances. In addition to investigating these opportunities of partnering with AI, we study the perceived barriers that impede DPAs' potential benefits as partners. These include perceived accuracy, transparency, feedback, and configurability, as well as misalignment between the DPA's categorisations of work behaviour and the categorisations used by workers in their jobs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand","volume":"53 1","pages":"95-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partnering with AI: the case of digital productivity assistants.\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyn Cranefield, Michael Winikoff, Yi-Te Chiu, Yevgeniya Li, Cathal Doyle, Alex Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03036758.2022.2114507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An emerging class of intelligent tools that we term Digital Productivity Assistants (DPAs) is designed to help workers improve their productivity and keep their work-life balance in check. Using personalised work-based analytics it raises awareness of individual collaboration behaviour and suggests improvements to work practices. The purpose of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the role of personalised work-based analytics in the context of (improving) individual productivity and work-life balance. We present an interpretive case study based on interviews with 28 workers who face high job demands and job variety and our own observations. Our study contributes to the still ongoing sensemaking of AI, by illustrating how DPAs can co-regulate human work through technology affordances. In addition to investigating these opportunities of partnering with AI, we study the perceived barriers that impede DPAs' potential benefits as partners. These include perceived accuracy, transparency, feedback, and configurability, as well as misalignment between the DPA's categorisations of work behaviour and the categorisations used by workers in their jobs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"95-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2022.2114507\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2022.2114507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要一类新兴的智能工具,我们称之为数字生产力助理(DPAs),旨在帮助员工提高生产力,保持工作与生活的平衡。使用个性化的基于工作的分析,它提高了对个人协作行为的认识,并建议改进工作实践。本研究的目的是帮助更好地理解个性化基于工作的分析在(提高)个人生产力和工作与生活平衡方面的作用。我们提出了一个解释性的案例研究,基于对28名面临高工作需求和工作多样性的工人的采访以及我们自己的观察。我们的研究通过说明DPA如何通过技术可供性共同调节人类工作,为仍在进行的人工智能感知做出了贡献。除了调查这些与人工智能合作的机会外,我们还研究了阻碍DPA作为合作伙伴的潜在利益的感知障碍。其中包括感知的准确性、透明度、反馈和可配置性,以及DPA对工作行为的分类与工人在工作中使用的分类之间的不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partnering with AI: the case of digital productivity assistants.

An emerging class of intelligent tools that we term Digital Productivity Assistants (DPAs) is designed to help workers improve their productivity and keep their work-life balance in check. Using personalised work-based analytics it raises awareness of individual collaboration behaviour and suggests improvements to work practices. The purpose of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the role of personalised work-based analytics in the context of (improving) individual productivity and work-life balance. We present an interpretive case study based on interviews with 28 workers who face high job demands and job variety and our own observations. Our study contributes to the still ongoing sensemaking of AI, by illustrating how DPAs can co-regulate human work through technology affordances. In addition to investigating these opportunities of partnering with AI, we study the perceived barriers that impede DPAs' potential benefits as partners. These include perceived accuracy, transparency, feedback, and configurability, as well as misalignment between the DPA's categorisations of work behaviour and the categorisations used by workers in their jobs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims: The Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand reflects the role of Royal Society Te Aparangi in fostering research and debate across natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in New Zealand/Aotearoa and the surrounding Pacific. Research published in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand advances scientific knowledge, informs government policy, public awareness and broader society, and is read by researchers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信