东欧与西欧国家的主观对等量表

IF 1.7 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Martina Mysíková, Tomáš Želinský, Thesia I. Garner, Kamila Fialová
{"title":"东欧与西欧国家的主观对等量表","authors":"Martina Mysíková,&nbsp;Tomáš Želinský,&nbsp;Thesia I. Garner,&nbsp;Kamila Fialová","doi":"10.1111/coep.12579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We show that economies of scale estimated individually for each EU country differ from the officially adopted OECD-modified scale; the differences across the countries further confirm the prevailing East-West disparity. Using the minimum income question in the 2019 EU-Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey, we demonstrate that applying the estimated country-specific subjective equivalence scales, instead of the uniform OECD-modified scale, results in up to a 6 pp change in the at-risk-of-poverty rate. If inadequate equivalence scales are used, the equivalised income fails to inform the statistics of income poverty and prevents national social policies from being correctly targeted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47364,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Economic Policy","volume":"40 4","pages":"659-676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective equivalence scales in Eastern versus Western European countries\",\"authors\":\"Martina Mysíková,&nbsp;Tomáš Želinský,&nbsp;Thesia I. Garner,&nbsp;Kamila Fialová\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coep.12579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We show that economies of scale estimated individually for each EU country differ from the officially adopted OECD-modified scale; the differences across the countries further confirm the prevailing East-West disparity. Using the minimum income question in the 2019 EU-Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey, we demonstrate that applying the estimated country-specific subjective equivalence scales, instead of the uniform OECD-modified scale, results in up to a 6 pp change in the at-risk-of-poverty rate. If inadequate equivalence scales are used, the equivalised income fails to inform the statistics of income poverty and prevents national social policies from being correctly targeted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Economic Policy\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"659-676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Economic Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coep.12579\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coep.12579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们表明,每个欧盟国家单独估计的规模经济不同于正式采用的经合组织修正的规模;各国之间的差异进一步证实了普遍存在的东西方差异。利用2019年欧盟收入和生活条件统计调查中的最低收入问题,我们证明,使用估计的国别主观等效尺度,而不是经合组织修改的统一尺度,导致贫困风险率的变化高达6个百分点。如果使用不充分的等效尺度,等效收入就不能为收入贫困的统计提供信息,并妨碍国家社会政策的正确定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective equivalence scales in Eastern versus Western European countries

We show that economies of scale estimated individually for each EU country differ from the officially adopted OECD-modified scale; the differences across the countries further confirm the prevailing East-West disparity. Using the minimum income question in the 2019 EU-Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey, we demonstrate that applying the estimated country-specific subjective equivalence scales, instead of the uniform OECD-modified scale, results in up to a 6 pp change in the at-risk-of-poverty rate. If inadequate equivalence scales are used, the equivalised income fails to inform the statistics of income poverty and prevents national social policies from being correctly targeted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Contemporary Economic Policy publishes scholarly economic research and analysis on issues of vital concern to business, government, and other decision makers. Leading western scholars, including three Nobel laureates, are among CEP"s authors. The objectives are to communicate results of high quality economic analysis to policymakers, focus high quality research and analysis on current policy issues of widespread concern, increase knowledge among economists of features of the economy key to understanding the impact of policy, and to advance methods of policy analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信