北极基础设施和社会系统的抗震能力:第一次国际研讨会

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES
M. Ghayoomi, K. Duderstadt, A. Kholodov, A. Shiklomanov, M. Turner, Elham Ajorlou
{"title":"北极基础设施和社会系统的抗震能力:第一次国际研讨会","authors":"M. Ghayoomi, K. Duderstadt, A. Kholodov, A. Shiklomanov, M. Turner, Elham Ajorlou","doi":"10.1080/2154896X.2022.2025718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental, ecological, and social changes interactively influence the seismic response of built infrastructure, the natural environment, and social systems in the Arctic. This includes direct and indirect climate impacts on earthquake-induced damages and postearthquake recovery. Challenges with currently available knowledge are that 1) scientific knowledge is discipline-focused, 2) local community and Indigenous knowledge is not always equally respected and incorporated, and 3) even in some sectors, the fundamental technical understanding is lacking. In order to design new sustainable and resilient systems that will minimise the damage of earthquakes to Arctic infrastructure and environmental systems, scientists and engineers need to better understand the threats facing communities and their infrastructure, including the local and global consequences of a changing climate. Knowing that some Arctic and sub-Arctic regions are seismically active, such a holistic approach becomes even more pressing. For example, the state of Alaska in the U.S. is one of the most seismically active regions in the world. About 10% of the world’s instrumented seismic events occur in Alaska, including some of the largest historic earthquakes. Seismically induced hazards can impact both natural environments (such as ground deformations, landslides, rock falls, tsunamis, liquefaction) and built infrastructure (such as collapse of buildings and bridges and disruptions in lifeline systems including transportation networks, power transmission, water supply and sewage systems, and communication networks). All of these damages and disruptions directly impact social systems and communities. Thus, any resilience metrics, recovery decision, or mitigation strategy require inputs from a range of stakeholders with different perspectives. A workshop was hosted by the University of New Hampshire to facilitate convergent discussions and to assess and prioritise the research needs and future directions of seismic resilience in the Arctic. The overarching goal of this workshop was to build capacity for investigating the resilience of Arctic infrastructure and social systems in response to seismic events in light of a changing climate. The core","PeriodicalId":52117,"journal":{"name":"Polar Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"172 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic resilience of Arctic infrastructure and social systems: 1st international workshop\",\"authors\":\"M. Ghayoomi, K. Duderstadt, A. Kholodov, A. Shiklomanov, M. Turner, Elham Ajorlou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2154896X.2022.2025718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental, ecological, and social changes interactively influence the seismic response of built infrastructure, the natural environment, and social systems in the Arctic. This includes direct and indirect climate impacts on earthquake-induced damages and postearthquake recovery. Challenges with currently available knowledge are that 1) scientific knowledge is discipline-focused, 2) local community and Indigenous knowledge is not always equally respected and incorporated, and 3) even in some sectors, the fundamental technical understanding is lacking. In order to design new sustainable and resilient systems that will minimise the damage of earthquakes to Arctic infrastructure and environmental systems, scientists and engineers need to better understand the threats facing communities and their infrastructure, including the local and global consequences of a changing climate. Knowing that some Arctic and sub-Arctic regions are seismically active, such a holistic approach becomes even more pressing. For example, the state of Alaska in the U.S. is one of the most seismically active regions in the world. About 10% of the world’s instrumented seismic events occur in Alaska, including some of the largest historic earthquakes. Seismically induced hazards can impact both natural environments (such as ground deformations, landslides, rock falls, tsunamis, liquefaction) and built infrastructure (such as collapse of buildings and bridges and disruptions in lifeline systems including transportation networks, power transmission, water supply and sewage systems, and communication networks). All of these damages and disruptions directly impact social systems and communities. Thus, any resilience metrics, recovery decision, or mitigation strategy require inputs from a range of stakeholders with different perspectives. A workshop was hosted by the University of New Hampshire to facilitate convergent discussions and to assess and prioritise the research needs and future directions of seismic resilience in the Arctic. The overarching goal of this workshop was to build capacity for investigating the resilience of Arctic infrastructure and social systems in response to seismic events in light of a changing climate. The core\",\"PeriodicalId\":52117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2022.2025718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2022.2025718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

环境、生态和社会变化相互影响着北极地区已建基础设施、自然环境和社会系统的地震响应。这包括气候对地震造成的损害和震后恢复的直接和间接影响。现有知识面临的挑战是:1)科学知识以学科为重点,2)地方社区和土著知识并不总是得到同等尊重和融合,3)即使在某些部门,也缺乏基本的技术理解。为了设计新的可持续和有弹性的系统,最大限度地减少地震对北极基础设施和环境系统的破坏,科学家和工程师需要更好地了解社区及其基础设施面临的威胁,包括气候变化对当地和全球的影响。知道一些北极和亚北极地区的地震活动非常活跃,这样一种全面的方法变得更加紧迫。例如,美国阿拉斯加州是世界上地震最活跃的地区之一。世界上大约10%的仪器地震事件发生在阿拉斯加,包括一些历史上最大的地震。地震引发的灾害既可能影响自然环境(如地面变形、山体滑坡、落石、海啸、液化),也可能影响已建基础设施(如建筑物和桥梁倒塌以及交通网络、输电、供水和污水处理系统以及通信网络等生命线系统中断)。所有这些破坏和干扰都直接影响到社会制度和社区。因此,任何恢复能力指标、恢复决策或缓解策略都需要来自不同角度的一系列利益相关者的投入。新罕布什尔大学举办了一次研讨会,以促进集中讨论,并评估和优先考虑北极地震恢复力的研究需求和未来方向。本次研讨会的首要目标是建立能力,调查北极基础设施和社会系统在气候变化的情况下应对地震事件的复原力。核心
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic resilience of Arctic infrastructure and social systems: 1st international workshop
Environmental, ecological, and social changes interactively influence the seismic response of built infrastructure, the natural environment, and social systems in the Arctic. This includes direct and indirect climate impacts on earthquake-induced damages and postearthquake recovery. Challenges with currently available knowledge are that 1) scientific knowledge is discipline-focused, 2) local community and Indigenous knowledge is not always equally respected and incorporated, and 3) even in some sectors, the fundamental technical understanding is lacking. In order to design new sustainable and resilient systems that will minimise the damage of earthquakes to Arctic infrastructure and environmental systems, scientists and engineers need to better understand the threats facing communities and their infrastructure, including the local and global consequences of a changing climate. Knowing that some Arctic and sub-Arctic regions are seismically active, such a holistic approach becomes even more pressing. For example, the state of Alaska in the U.S. is one of the most seismically active regions in the world. About 10% of the world’s instrumented seismic events occur in Alaska, including some of the largest historic earthquakes. Seismically induced hazards can impact both natural environments (such as ground deformations, landslides, rock falls, tsunamis, liquefaction) and built infrastructure (such as collapse of buildings and bridges and disruptions in lifeline systems including transportation networks, power transmission, water supply and sewage systems, and communication networks). All of these damages and disruptions directly impact social systems and communities. Thus, any resilience metrics, recovery decision, or mitigation strategy require inputs from a range of stakeholders with different perspectives. A workshop was hosted by the University of New Hampshire to facilitate convergent discussions and to assess and prioritise the research needs and future directions of seismic resilience in the Arctic. The overarching goal of this workshop was to build capacity for investigating the resilience of Arctic infrastructure and social systems in response to seismic events in light of a changing climate. The core
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Journal
Polar Journal Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Antarctica and the Arctic are of crucial importance to global security. Their governance and the patterns of human interactions there are increasingly contentious; mining, tourism, bioprospecting, and fishing are but a few of the many issues of contention, while environmental concerns such as melting ice sheets have a global impact. The Polar Journal is a forum for the scholarly discussion of polar issues from a social science and humanities perspective and brings together the considerable number of specialists and policy makers working on these crucial regions across multiple disciplines. The journal welcomes papers on polar affairs from all fields of the social sciences and the humanities and is especially interested in publishing policy-relevant research. Each issue of the journal either features articles from different disciplines on polar affairs or is a topical theme from a range of scholarly approaches. Topics include: • Polar governance and policy • Polar history, heritage, and culture • Polar economics • Polar politics • Music, art, and literature of the polar regions • Polar tourism • Polar geography and geopolitics • Polar psychology • Polar archaeology Manuscript types accepted: • Regular articles • Research reports • Opinion pieces • Book Reviews • Conference Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信