地外生态系统中人类的三种愿景:Klein, Kosik, sk登

Q4 Arts and Humanities

Porownania Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.14746/por.2022.1.8

Rafał Pokrywka

{"title":"地外生态系统中人类的三种愿景:Klein, Kosik, sk<s:1>登","authors":"Rafał Pokrywka","doi":"10.14746/por.2022.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper, three contemporary science fiction novels are compared: Die Zukunft des Mars (2013) by Georg Klein, Kameleon (2008) by Rafał Kosik, and Fugl (2019) by Sigbjørn Skåden. As possible scenarios of a future colonisation of other planets, the novels represent three different patterns of human existence in extraterrestrial ecosystems: adaptation, imitation, and indifference. They are discussed in the context of contemporary speculative narrations on human life outside of Earth.","PeriodicalId":37922,"journal":{"name":"Porownania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Visions of Humanity in Extraterrestrial Ecosystems: Klein, Kosik, Skåden\",\"authors\":\"Rafał Pokrywka\",\"doi\":\"10.14746/por.2022.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper, three contemporary science fiction novels are compared: Die Zukunft des Mars (2013) by Georg Klein, Kameleon (2008) by Rafał Kosik, and Fugl (2019) by Sigbjørn Skåden. As possible scenarios of a future colonisation of other planets, the novels represent three different patterns of human existence in extraterrestrial ecosystems: adaptation, imitation, and indifference. They are discussed in the context of contemporary speculative narrations on human life outside of Earth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Porownania\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Porownania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14746/por.2022.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porownania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/por.2022.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了三部当代科幻小说：格奥尔格·克莱因的《火星之死》（Die Zukunft des Mars）（2013）、拉法·科西克的《卡米伦》（Kameleon）（2008）和西格恩·斯科登的《Fugl》（2019）。作为未来其他星球殖民的可能场景，这些小说代表了人类在地外生态系统中存在的三种不同模式：适应、模仿和冷漠。它们是在当代关于地球以外人类生活的推测性叙述的背景下讨论的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Three Visions of Humanity in Extraterrestrial Ecosystems: Klein, Kosik, Skåden

In the paper, three contemporary science fiction novels are compared: Die Zukunft des Mars (2013) by Georg Klein, Kameleon (2008) by Rafał Kosik, and Fugl (2019) by Sigbjørn Skåden. As possible scenarios of a future colonisation of other planets, the novels represent three different patterns of human existence in extraterrestrial ecosystems: adaptation, imitation, and indifference. They are discussed in the context of contemporary speculative narrations on human life outside of Earth.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Porownania Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The 2019 tercentenary of the publication of Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe provides the perfect opportunity to reconsider the global status of the Robinsonade as a genre. Its translations, transformations, and a gradual separation from the founding text by Daniel Defoe have revealed its truly international character, with the term ‘Robinsonade’ itself first used in the German literary tradition and the most enduring narrative structure established not so much by Defoe himself but by J.J. Rousseau and his commentary on Robinson Crusoe in Emile; or, On Education. This issue will address the circulation of the Robinsonade across cultures and national contexts, the adaptability of the form and its potential to speak to various audiences at different historical moments. We invite contributions on all aspects of the afterlives of the Robinsonade across languages and media, with a particular interest in contemporary variations on the theme.