慢性疼痛患者在支持治疗与眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)治疗中的语言分析与比较

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
M.-J. Brennstuhl , F. Bassan , C. Tarquinio
{"title":"慢性疼痛患者在支持治疗与眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)治疗中的语言分析与比较","authors":"M.-J. Brennstuhl ,&nbsp;F. Bassan ,&nbsp;C. Tarquinio","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2018.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The use of EMDR – Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing – being innovative in the area of chronic pain. If his efficiency as show in the specific litterature, the way its work it is really different than usual therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of this work is to compare the speech of patients during the use of EMDR vs. supportive therapy in a supported unit of chronic pain to the hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-five patients divided into three groups received EMDR therapy (standard protocol), EMDR therapy (pain protocol) as well as supportive therapy. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the software Alceste.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that the semantic classes differ between the three forms of therapy, as well as passive or active posture of the patient during the therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These results give us an additional insights into what happens in fine in different types of therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 441-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2018.06.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyse et comparaison de discours de patients douloureux chroniques durant une thérapie de soutien par opposition à l’utilisation de la thérapie Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)\",\"authors\":\"M.-J. Brennstuhl ,&nbsp;F. Bassan ,&nbsp;C. Tarquinio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prps.2018.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The use of EMDR – Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing – being innovative in the area of chronic pain. If his efficiency as show in the specific litterature, the way its work it is really different than usual therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of this work is to compare the speech of patients during the use of EMDR vs. supportive therapy in a supported unit of chronic pain to the hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-five patients divided into three groups received EMDR therapy (standard protocol), EMDR therapy (pain protocol) as well as supportive therapy. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the software Alceste.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that the semantic classes differ between the three forms of therapy, as well as passive or active posture of the patient during the therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These results give us an additional insights into what happens in fine in different types of therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 441-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2018.06.003\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176318300452\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176318300452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

EMDR -眼动脱敏和再处理-在慢性疼痛领域的创新应用。如果他的有效性表现在具体的文献中,它的工作方式确实不同于通常的治疗方法。目的本研究的主要目的是比较EMDR与支持疗法在医院慢性疼痛支持单元中患者的言语。方法45例患者分为3组,分别接受EMDR治疗(标准方案)、EMDR治疗(疼痛方案)和支持治疗。所有的访谈都使用Alceste软件进行转录和分析。结果三种治疗方式的语义分类存在差异,患者在治疗过程中的被动或主动姿态也存在差异。结论:这些结果让我们对不同类型的治疗在总体上发生了什么有了更多的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyse et comparaison de discours de patients douloureux chroniques durant une thérapie de soutien par opposition à l’utilisation de la thérapie Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)

Introduction

The use of EMDR – Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing – being innovative in the area of chronic pain. If his efficiency as show in the specific litterature, the way its work it is really different than usual therapy.

Objective

The main objective of this work is to compare the speech of patients during the use of EMDR vs. supportive therapy in a supported unit of chronic pain to the hospital.

Methods

Forty-five patients divided into three groups received EMDR therapy (standard protocol), EMDR therapy (pain protocol) as well as supportive therapy. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the software Alceste.

Results

The results show that the semantic classes differ between the three forms of therapy, as well as passive or active posture of the patient during the therapy.

Conclusion

These results give us an additional insights into what happens in fine in different types of therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信