范式转变的政策阻力:加拿大的包容性增长和创新

IF 1.1 4区 管理学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Alix J. Jansen, Mark Robbins
{"title":"范式转变的政策阻力:加拿大的包容性增长和创新","authors":"Alix J. Jansen,&nbsp;Mark Robbins","doi":"10.1111/capa.12456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We assess Canada's labour market policy mix in order to determine whether the inclusive growth and innovation agenda indicates that technological change has triggered a policy paradigm shift. Our analysis of four policy areas concerning labour market access indicates no paradigm shift has occurred. Instead, the agenda is an example of policy resistance: first- and second-order policy changes (changes to policy settings) maintain the status quo of labour market arrangements. The result is a revised set of supply-side policies unlikely to reorganize the labour market. Technological disruption and the COVID-19 pandemic offer opportunities to reorganize Canada's labour market policies' current policy mix, but, even under the banner of inclusive innovation, this shift is unlikely to happen.</p>","PeriodicalId":46145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","volume":"65 2","pages":"223-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy resistance to paradigm shifts: Inclusive growth and innovation in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Alix J. Jansen,&nbsp;Mark Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/capa.12456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We assess Canada's labour market policy mix in order to determine whether the inclusive growth and innovation agenda indicates that technological change has triggered a policy paradigm shift. Our analysis of four policy areas concerning labour market access indicates no paradigm shift has occurred. Instead, the agenda is an example of policy resistance: first- and second-order policy changes (changes to policy settings) maintain the status quo of labour market arrangements. The result is a revised set of supply-side policies unlikely to reorganize the labour market. Technological disruption and the COVID-19 pandemic offer opportunities to reorganize Canada's labour market policies' current policy mix, but, even under the banner of inclusive innovation, this shift is unlikely to happen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"223-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.12456\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.12456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们评估了加拿大的劳动力市场政策组合,以确定包容性增长和创新议程是否表明技术变革引发了政策范式转变。我们对有关劳动力市场准入的四个政策领域的分析表明,没有发生范式转变。相反,该议程是政策阻力的一个例子:一级和二级政策变化(政策设置的变化)维持了劳动力市场安排的现状。其结果是一套经过修订的供给侧政策不太可能重组劳动力市场。技术中断和COVID-19大流行为重组加拿大劳动力市场政策的当前政策组合提供了机会,但是,即使在包容性创新的旗帜下,这种转变也不太可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy resistance to paradigm shifts: Inclusive growth and innovation in Canada

We assess Canada's labour market policy mix in order to determine whether the inclusive growth and innovation agenda indicates that technological change has triggered a policy paradigm shift. Our analysis of four policy areas concerning labour market access indicates no paradigm shift has occurred. Instead, the agenda is an example of policy resistance: first- and second-order policy changes (changes to policy settings) maintain the status quo of labour market arrangements. The result is a revised set of supply-side policies unlikely to reorganize the labour market. Technological disruption and the COVID-19 pandemic offer opportunities to reorganize Canada's labour market policies' current policy mix, but, even under the banner of inclusive innovation, this shift is unlikely to happen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada is the refereed scholarly publication of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). It covers executive, legislative, judicial and quasi-judicial functions at all three levels of Canadian government. Published quarterly, the journal focuses mainly on Canadian issues but also welcomes manuscripts which compare Canadian public sector institutions and practices with those in other countries or examine issues in other countries or international organizations which are of interest to the public administration community in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信