Yiling Zeng , Yu Chang , Sheng Zhang , Jun Han , Hongyuan Liu , Feng Xiao , Bo Pang , Bin Hu , Junping Cheng , Hong Quan , Zhiyong Yang
{"title":"可变参数胸腔肿瘤立体定向放射治疗4D动态剂量的临床评价","authors":"Yiling Zeng , Yu Chang , Sheng Zhang , Jun Han , Hongyuan Liu , Feng Xiao , Bo Pang , Bin Hu , Junping Cheng , Hong Quan , Zhiyong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the dose uncertainty in stereotactic body radiation therapy induced by respiratory motion using a 4D dynamic dose (4DDD) reconstruction method.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on five lung cancer patients who received static intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The 4DDD was constructed using beam delivery log files, four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans, and treatment plans. To evaluate the impact of respiratory motion, 4DDD calculations were performed with 10 starting phases for each field. A total of 270 field doses were simulated and calculated. The differences between the cumulative volume histogram in whole-course treatment and the field doses' gamma passing rate (GPR) were compared. The correlations between plan complexity metrics and the dose deviation caused by respiratory motion were evaluated independently. The phase distributions of 398 subfields were calculated and evaluated for the influence of dose rate and breathing frequency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The GPRs of all fields were different among various starting phases, with the highest range from 62.20% to 76.87% for 2 mm/3% GPR. The deviation of mean point dose was (5.42 ± 5.21) %, and the deviation in the mean dose and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>D</mi><mrow><mn>98</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> within the internal gross tumor volume were (0.97 ± 0.71) % and (0.77 ± 0.53) %, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the beam aperture-to-volume (BA2V) ratio and the average 2 mm/2% GPR (<em>R =</em> 0.601, <em>P</em> < 0.01). Lower dose rates led to a more homogeneous distribution of phases among subfields (<em>t</em> = 44.100, <em>P</em> < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Different beam starting phases had a limited impact on the overall treatment evaluation. However, the respiratory motion could be observed to induce dose deviations using the 4DDD reconstruction model, particularly for fields with small BA2V.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 150-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of 4D dynamic dose for thoracic tumor stereotactic body radiation therapy with variable parameters\",\"authors\":\"Yiling Zeng , Yu Chang , Sheng Zhang , Jun Han , Hongyuan Liu , Feng Xiao , Bo Pang , Bin Hu , Junping Cheng , Hong Quan , Zhiyong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the dose uncertainty in stereotactic body radiation therapy induced by respiratory motion using a 4D dynamic dose (4DDD) reconstruction method.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on five lung cancer patients who received static intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The 4DDD was constructed using beam delivery log files, four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans, and treatment plans. To evaluate the impact of respiratory motion, 4DDD calculations were performed with 10 starting phases for each field. A total of 270 field doses were simulated and calculated. The differences between the cumulative volume histogram in whole-course treatment and the field doses' gamma passing rate (GPR) were compared. The correlations between plan complexity metrics and the dose deviation caused by respiratory motion were evaluated independently. The phase distributions of 398 subfields were calculated and evaluated for the influence of dose rate and breathing frequency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The GPRs of all fields were different among various starting phases, with the highest range from 62.20% to 76.87% for 2 mm/3% GPR. The deviation of mean point dose was (5.42 ± 5.21) %, and the deviation in the mean dose and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>D</mi><mrow><mn>98</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> within the internal gross tumor volume were (0.97 ± 0.71) % and (0.77 ± 0.53) %, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the beam aperture-to-volume (BA2V) ratio and the average 2 mm/2% GPR (<em>R =</em> 0.601, <em>P</em> < 0.01). Lower dose rates led to a more homogeneous distribution of phases among subfields (<em>t</em> = 44.100, <em>P</em> < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Different beam starting phases had a limited impact on the overall treatment evaluation. However, the respiratory motion could be observed to induce dose deviations using the 4DDD reconstruction model, particularly for fields with small BA2V.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 150-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的应用四维动态剂量重建方法评价呼吸运动诱导立体定向放射治疗的剂量不确定性。方法对5例接受静态调强放疗的肺癌患者进行回顾性分析。4DDD是使用光束传输日志文件、四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)扫描和治疗计划构建的。为了评估呼吸运动的影响,进行4DDD计算,每个领域有10个开始阶段。模拟和计算了270个现场剂量。比较全疗程累积体积直方图与野剂量γ通过率(GPR)的差异。计划复杂度指标与呼吸运动引起的剂量偏差之间的相关性独立评估。计算了398个子场的相位分布,并对剂量率和呼吸频率的影响进行了评价。结果不同起始阶段各场的GPR值不同,2 mm/3% GPR值最高,为62.20% ~ 76.87%;平均点剂量偏差为(5.42±5.21)%,平均剂量和D98%在肿瘤内部总体积内的偏差分别为(0.97±0.71)%和(0.77±0.53)%。光束孔径体积比(BA2V)与平均2 mm/2% GPR之间存在显著相关性(R = 0.601, P <0.01)。较低的剂量率导致子场间相分布更为均匀(t = 44.100, P <0.001)。结论不同光束起始阶段对整体治疗评价的影响有限。然而,使用4DDD重建模型可以观察到呼吸运动诱导剂量偏差,特别是对于BA2V较小的场。
Clinical evaluation of 4D dynamic dose for thoracic tumor stereotactic body radiation therapy with variable parameters
Objective
To evaluate the dose uncertainty in stereotactic body radiation therapy induced by respiratory motion using a 4D dynamic dose (4DDD) reconstruction method.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on five lung cancer patients who received static intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The 4DDD was constructed using beam delivery log files, four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans, and treatment plans. To evaluate the impact of respiratory motion, 4DDD calculations were performed with 10 starting phases for each field. A total of 270 field doses were simulated and calculated. The differences between the cumulative volume histogram in whole-course treatment and the field doses' gamma passing rate (GPR) were compared. The correlations between plan complexity metrics and the dose deviation caused by respiratory motion were evaluated independently. The phase distributions of 398 subfields were calculated and evaluated for the influence of dose rate and breathing frequency.
Results
The GPRs of all fields were different among various starting phases, with the highest range from 62.20% to 76.87% for 2 mm/3% GPR. The deviation of mean point dose was (5.42 ± 5.21) %, and the deviation in the mean dose and within the internal gross tumor volume were (0.97 ± 0.71) % and (0.77 ± 0.53) %, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the beam aperture-to-volume (BA2V) ratio and the average 2 mm/2% GPR (R = 0.601, P < 0.01). Lower dose rates led to a more homogeneous distribution of phases among subfields (t = 44.100, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Different beam starting phases had a limited impact on the overall treatment evaluation. However, the respiratory motion could be observed to induce dose deviations using the 4DDD reconstruction model, particularly for fields with small BA2V.