马纳玛利亚的妇女非纸

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
Mônica Gomes da Silva
{"title":"马纳玛利亚的妇女非纸","authors":"Mônica Gomes da Silva","doi":"10.12957/matraga.2020.44335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The only novel written by Antonio de Alcântara Machado d’Oliveira, Mana Maria (1936), is considered by the main commentators of his works as the consolidation of his modernist prose style. Thus, this article aims to analyze the singularity of this work in the author’s production, based on the revision of the two trends of the novel critical tradition. Firstly, it is assumed that Mana Maria represents a step ahead when it comes to character construction, refusing the typification found in the works of the 1920’s. Secondly, the novel starts to represent the defense of the “400th anniversary paulistas”, a portrait of a socially decaying oligarchy, divided between the glorification of the past and the trivialization of the present. The novel allegedly also symbolizes Sao Paulo’s bitter response to Brazil’s reaction during the Constitutionalist Revolution (1932). In order to look into the critical tradition and the issue of character construction in the 1930’s novels, the analyses by Mario de Andrade (1936), Luis Toledo Machado (1970), Cecilia de Lara (1988), Sergio Miceli (2001) and Luis Bueno (2015), among others, were helpful. On the basis of the theoretical background proposed, it becomes evident that this novel represents a turning point in A. de A. M.’s career. Thus, one can note that the female role acquires a new status within the author’s work, whilst intersecting with powerful female representations that permeate the 1930’s novels.","PeriodicalId":40929,"journal":{"name":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","volume":"27 1","pages":"244-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O \\\"NÃO-PAPEL\\\" FEMININO EM MANA MARIA\",\"authors\":\"Mônica Gomes da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.12957/matraga.2020.44335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The only novel written by Antonio de Alcântara Machado d’Oliveira, Mana Maria (1936), is considered by the main commentators of his works as the consolidation of his modernist prose style. Thus, this article aims to analyze the singularity of this work in the author’s production, based on the revision of the two trends of the novel critical tradition. Firstly, it is assumed that Mana Maria represents a step ahead when it comes to character construction, refusing the typification found in the works of the 1920’s. Secondly, the novel starts to represent the defense of the “400th anniversary paulistas”, a portrait of a socially decaying oligarchy, divided between the glorification of the past and the trivialization of the present. The novel allegedly also symbolizes Sao Paulo’s bitter response to Brazil’s reaction during the Constitutionalist Revolution (1932). In order to look into the critical tradition and the issue of character construction in the 1930’s novels, the analyses by Mario de Andrade (1936), Luis Toledo Machado (1970), Cecilia de Lara (1988), Sergio Miceli (2001) and Luis Bueno (2015), among others, were helpful. On the basis of the theoretical background proposed, it becomes evident that this novel represents a turning point in A. de A. M.’s career. Thus, one can note that the female role acquires a new status within the author’s work, whilst intersecting with powerful female representations that permeate the 1930’s novels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"244-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2020.44335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2020.44335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安东尼奥·德·阿尔·恩塔拉·马查多·德·奥利维拉唯一的一部小说《玛娜·玛丽亚》(1936年)被他作品的主要评论家认为是他现代主义散文风格的巩固。因此,本文旨在通过对小说批评传统的两种倾向的修正,来分析这部作品在作者创作中的独特性。首先,人们认为《玛娜玛丽亚》在人物塑造方面迈出了一步,拒绝了20世纪20年代作品中的典型化。其次,小说开始为“400周年保利主义者”辩护,描绘了一个社会腐朽的寡头政治,分为对过去的赞美和对现在的轻视。据称,这部小说也象征着圣保罗对巴西在1932年立宪革命期间的反应的痛苦回应。为了研究20世纪30年代小说中的批评传统和角色建构问题,马里奥·德·安德拉德(1936)、路易斯·托莱多·马查多(1970)、塞西莉亚·德·拉拉(1988)、塞尔吉奥·米塞利(2001)和路易斯·布埃诺(2015)等人的分析很有帮助。在此理论背景的基础上,可以看出这部小说是a . de . a . M.职业生涯的一个转折点。因此,我们可以注意到,女性角色在作者的作品中获得了一个新的地位,同时与20世纪30年代小说中弥漫着的强大的女性表现相交叉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O "NÃO-PAPEL" FEMININO EM MANA MARIA
The only novel written by Antonio de Alcântara Machado d’Oliveira, Mana Maria (1936), is considered by the main commentators of his works as the consolidation of his modernist prose style. Thus, this article aims to analyze the singularity of this work in the author’s production, based on the revision of the two trends of the novel critical tradition. Firstly, it is assumed that Mana Maria represents a step ahead when it comes to character construction, refusing the typification found in the works of the 1920’s. Secondly, the novel starts to represent the defense of the “400th anniversary paulistas”, a portrait of a socially decaying oligarchy, divided between the glorification of the past and the trivialization of the present. The novel allegedly also symbolizes Sao Paulo’s bitter response to Brazil’s reaction during the Constitutionalist Revolution (1932). In order to look into the critical tradition and the issue of character construction in the 1930’s novels, the analyses by Mario de Andrade (1936), Luis Toledo Machado (1970), Cecilia de Lara (1988), Sergio Miceli (2001) and Luis Bueno (2015), among others, were helpful. On the basis of the theoretical background proposed, it becomes evident that this novel represents a turning point in A. de A. M.’s career. Thus, one can note that the female role acquires a new status within the author’s work, whilst intersecting with powerful female representations that permeate the 1930’s novels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信