{"title":"马纳玛利亚的妇女非纸","authors":"Mônica Gomes da Silva","doi":"10.12957/matraga.2020.44335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The only novel written by Antonio de Alcântara Machado d’Oliveira, Mana Maria (1936), is considered by the main commentators of his works as the consolidation of his modernist prose style. Thus, this article aims to analyze the singularity of this work in the author’s production, based on the revision of the two trends of the novel critical tradition. Firstly, it is assumed that Mana Maria represents a step ahead when it comes to character construction, refusing the typification found in the works of the 1920’s. Secondly, the novel starts to represent the defense of the “400th anniversary paulistas”, a portrait of a socially decaying oligarchy, divided between the glorification of the past and the trivialization of the present. The novel allegedly also symbolizes Sao Paulo’s bitter response to Brazil’s reaction during the Constitutionalist Revolution (1932). In order to look into the critical tradition and the issue of character construction in the 1930’s novels, the analyses by Mario de Andrade (1936), Luis Toledo Machado (1970), Cecilia de Lara (1988), Sergio Miceli (2001) and Luis Bueno (2015), among others, were helpful. On the basis of the theoretical background proposed, it becomes evident that this novel represents a turning point in A. de A. M.’s career. Thus, one can note that the female role acquires a new status within the author’s work, whilst intersecting with powerful female representations that permeate the 1930’s novels.","PeriodicalId":40929,"journal":{"name":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","volume":"27 1","pages":"244-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O \\\"NÃO-PAPEL\\\" FEMININO EM MANA MARIA\",\"authors\":\"Mônica Gomes da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.12957/matraga.2020.44335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The only novel written by Antonio de Alcântara Machado d’Oliveira, Mana Maria (1936), is considered by the main commentators of his works as the consolidation of his modernist prose style. Thus, this article aims to analyze the singularity of this work in the author’s production, based on the revision of the two trends of the novel critical tradition. Firstly, it is assumed that Mana Maria represents a step ahead when it comes to character construction, refusing the typification found in the works of the 1920’s. Secondly, the novel starts to represent the defense of the “400th anniversary paulistas”, a portrait of a socially decaying oligarchy, divided between the glorification of the past and the trivialization of the present. The novel allegedly also symbolizes Sao Paulo’s bitter response to Brazil’s reaction during the Constitutionalist Revolution (1932). In order to look into the critical tradition and the issue of character construction in the 1930’s novels, the analyses by Mario de Andrade (1936), Luis Toledo Machado (1970), Cecilia de Lara (1988), Sergio Miceli (2001) and Luis Bueno (2015), among others, were helpful. On the basis of the theoretical background proposed, it becomes evident that this novel represents a turning point in A. de A. M.’s career. Thus, one can note that the female role acquires a new status within the author’s work, whilst intersecting with powerful female representations that permeate the 1930’s novels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"244-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2020.44335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2020.44335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
安东尼奥·德·阿尔·恩塔拉·马查多·德·奥利维拉唯一的一部小说《玛娜·玛丽亚》(1936年)被他作品的主要评论家认为是他现代主义散文风格的巩固。因此,本文旨在通过对小说批评传统的两种倾向的修正,来分析这部作品在作者创作中的独特性。首先,人们认为《玛娜玛丽亚》在人物塑造方面迈出了一步,拒绝了20世纪20年代作品中的典型化。其次,小说开始为“400周年保利主义者”辩护,描绘了一个社会腐朽的寡头政治,分为对过去的赞美和对现在的轻视。据称,这部小说也象征着圣保罗对巴西在1932年立宪革命期间的反应的痛苦回应。为了研究20世纪30年代小说中的批评传统和角色建构问题,马里奥·德·安德拉德(1936)、路易斯·托莱多·马查多(1970)、塞西莉亚·德·拉拉(1988)、塞尔吉奥·米塞利(2001)和路易斯·布埃诺(2015)等人的分析很有帮助。在此理论背景的基础上,可以看出这部小说是a . de . a . M.职业生涯的一个转折点。因此,我们可以注意到,女性角色在作者的作品中获得了一个新的地位,同时与20世纪30年代小说中弥漫着的强大的女性表现相交叉。
The only novel written by Antonio de Alcântara Machado d’Oliveira, Mana Maria (1936), is considered by the main commentators of his works as the consolidation of his modernist prose style. Thus, this article aims to analyze the singularity of this work in the author’s production, based on the revision of the two trends of the novel critical tradition. Firstly, it is assumed that Mana Maria represents a step ahead when it comes to character construction, refusing the typification found in the works of the 1920’s. Secondly, the novel starts to represent the defense of the “400th anniversary paulistas”, a portrait of a socially decaying oligarchy, divided between the glorification of the past and the trivialization of the present. The novel allegedly also symbolizes Sao Paulo’s bitter response to Brazil’s reaction during the Constitutionalist Revolution (1932). In order to look into the critical tradition and the issue of character construction in the 1930’s novels, the analyses by Mario de Andrade (1936), Luis Toledo Machado (1970), Cecilia de Lara (1988), Sergio Miceli (2001) and Luis Bueno (2015), among others, were helpful. On the basis of the theoretical background proposed, it becomes evident that this novel represents a turning point in A. de A. M.’s career. Thus, one can note that the female role acquires a new status within the author’s work, whilst intersecting with powerful female representations that permeate the 1930’s novels.