审查视觉艺术:禁止Aidron Duckworth在南非种族隔离时期的作品

IF 0.1 0 ART
Deléne Human
{"title":"审查视觉艺术:禁止Aidron Duckworth在南非种族隔离时期的作品","authors":"Deléne Human","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2019.1637578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Censorship became increasingly acute in South Africa during the 1960s. Influenced by Dutch Reformed Church leaders, the apartheid government sought to proscribe artistic works that expressed opposition to the politics and ideologies of the time. This article explores the Aidron Duckworth case of 1971 as part of an anti-censorship campaign organised by the Pasquino Society. Duckworth exhibited at the Durban Art Gallery in 1971, at which point eight paintings were banned by the Publications Control Board and deemed “undesirable” because of their “sexually suggestive” nature. In response, to appeal the board's decision, a fund to cover the artist's legal costs was established. Engaging with the Publications Control Board's reasoning, I consider how the government was in fact controlling the board and enforcing a specific kind of moral ideology that served the ends of those in power. Relying on archival materials, the law, and censorship literature on music, publications, film productions, and popular magazine circulations during apartheid in South Africa, my research addresses the literature gap regarding censorship of visual arts. I reflect on controversies surrounding the suppression of Duckworth's works and conclude by explaining why Duckworth's work was an obvious target for censorship.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"55 1","pages":"3 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2019.1637578","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Censoring the Visual Arts: Banning Aidron Duckworth's Work during Apartheid in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Deléne Human\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043389.2019.1637578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Censorship became increasingly acute in South Africa during the 1960s. Influenced by Dutch Reformed Church leaders, the apartheid government sought to proscribe artistic works that expressed opposition to the politics and ideologies of the time. This article explores the Aidron Duckworth case of 1971 as part of an anti-censorship campaign organised by the Pasquino Society. Duckworth exhibited at the Durban Art Gallery in 1971, at which point eight paintings were banned by the Publications Control Board and deemed “undesirable” because of their “sexually suggestive” nature. In response, to appeal the board's decision, a fund to cover the artist's legal costs was established. Engaging with the Publications Control Board's reasoning, I consider how the government was in fact controlling the board and enforcing a specific kind of moral ideology that served the ends of those in power. Relying on archival materials, the law, and censorship literature on music, publications, film productions, and popular magazine circulations during apartheid in South Africa, my research addresses the literature gap regarding censorship of visual arts. I reflect on controversies surrounding the suppression of Duckworth's works and conclude by explaining why Duckworth's work was an obvious target for censorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Arte\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2019.1637578\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Arte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2019.1637578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2019.1637578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪60年代,南非的抽象审查制度日益严重。受荷兰归正教会领袖的影响,种族隔离政府试图禁止表达反对当时政治和意识形态的艺术作品。这篇文章探讨了1971年Aidron Duckworth案,这是Pasquino协会组织的反审查运动的一部分。1971年,达克沃斯在德班美术馆展出,当时有八幅画被出版物控制委员会禁止,并因其“性暗示”性质而被视为“不受欢迎”。作为回应,为了对董事会的决定提出上诉,成立了一个基金来支付这位艺术家的法律费用。在参与出版物控制委员会的推理时,我考虑到政府实际上是如何控制该委员会并实施一种特定的道德意识形态的,这种意识形态为当权者的目的服务。依靠档案材料、法律和关于音乐、出版物、电影制作和南非种族隔离期间流行杂志发行的审查文献,我的研究解决了视觉艺术审查方面的文献空白。我反思了围绕达克沃斯作品被压制的争议,最后解释了为什么达克沃斯的作品显然是审查的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Censoring the Visual Arts: Banning Aidron Duckworth's Work during Apartheid in South Africa
Abstract Censorship became increasingly acute in South Africa during the 1960s. Influenced by Dutch Reformed Church leaders, the apartheid government sought to proscribe artistic works that expressed opposition to the politics and ideologies of the time. This article explores the Aidron Duckworth case of 1971 as part of an anti-censorship campaign organised by the Pasquino Society. Duckworth exhibited at the Durban Art Gallery in 1971, at which point eight paintings were banned by the Publications Control Board and deemed “undesirable” because of their “sexually suggestive” nature. In response, to appeal the board's decision, a fund to cover the artist's legal costs was established. Engaging with the Publications Control Board's reasoning, I consider how the government was in fact controlling the board and enforcing a specific kind of moral ideology that served the ends of those in power. Relying on archival materials, the law, and censorship literature on music, publications, film productions, and popular magazine circulations during apartheid in South Africa, my research addresses the literature gap regarding censorship of visual arts. I reflect on controversies surrounding the suppression of Duckworth's works and conclude by explaining why Duckworth's work was an obvious target for censorship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
De Arte
De Arte ART-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信