阿根廷的紧急家庭收入(IFE):它能成为永久的安全网吗?

Q3 Social Sciences
L. E. Calcagno
{"title":"阿根廷的紧急家庭收入(IFE):它能成为永久的安全网吗?","authors":"L. E. Calcagno","doi":"10.34196/ijm.00235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argentina adopted an early lock-down strategy to mitigate the COVID19 pandemic in March 2020. To allow households that were out of the formal labour market to abide by the lock-down, an Emergency Family Income (IFE) was given to households with no pension or formal labour income between April and September 2020. The benefit was praised for its role in reducing poverty and providing for millions of households that had lost their income, but it was discontinued after September 2020 when most of the COVID19 restrictions had been lifted. In this paper, we run counter-factual dynamic simulations of what would have been the cost and distributive impact of maintaining the IFE after September 2020, and making it a permanent benefit. We show this would have represented initially a yearly additional expenditure of nearly 1.5% of GDP, with a downward trend. This is comparable to the cost of all family benefits. We also estimate that a permanent IFE would have significantly reduced income inequality. We thus show a permanent IFE would be financially feasible, although whether it is desirable or how it should be funded is open to debate. © 2021, Calcagno.","PeriodicalId":37916,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Microsimulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Emergency Family Income (IFE) in Argentina: could it become a permanent safety net?\",\"authors\":\"L. E. Calcagno\",\"doi\":\"10.34196/ijm.00235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Argentina adopted an early lock-down strategy to mitigate the COVID19 pandemic in March 2020. To allow households that were out of the formal labour market to abide by the lock-down, an Emergency Family Income (IFE) was given to households with no pension or formal labour income between April and September 2020. The benefit was praised for its role in reducing poverty and providing for millions of households that had lost their income, but it was discontinued after September 2020 when most of the COVID19 restrictions had been lifted. In this paper, we run counter-factual dynamic simulations of what would have been the cost and distributive impact of maintaining the IFE after September 2020, and making it a permanent benefit. We show this would have represented initially a yearly additional expenditure of nearly 1.5% of GDP, with a downward trend. This is comparable to the cost of all family benefits. We also estimate that a permanent IFE would have significantly reduced income inequality. We thus show a permanent IFE would be financially feasible, although whether it is desirable or how it should be funded is open to debate. © 2021, Calcagno.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Microsimulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Microsimulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34196/ijm.00235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Microsimulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34196/ijm.00235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿根廷于2020年3月采取了早期封锁战略,以缓解covid - 19大流行。为了使脱离正规劳动力市场的家庭能够遵守禁令,在2020年4月至9月期间,向没有养老金或正规劳动收入的家庭发放了紧急家庭收入。该福利因其在减少贫困和为数百万失去收入的家庭提供帮助方面的作用而受到称赞,但在2020年9月大部分covid - 19限制解除后,该福利停止了。在本文中,我们对2020年9月之后维持IFE的成本和分配影响进行了反事实动态模拟,并使其成为永久利益。我们表明,这最初意味着每年的额外支出将接近GDP的1.5%,并呈下降趋势。这相当于所有家庭福利的成本。我们还估计,永久生活费用将显著减少收入不平等。因此,我们表明,永久的IFE在财政上是可行的,尽管它是否可取或应该如何资助还有待讨论。©2021,Calcagno。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Emergency Family Income (IFE) in Argentina: could it become a permanent safety net?
Argentina adopted an early lock-down strategy to mitigate the COVID19 pandemic in March 2020. To allow households that were out of the formal labour market to abide by the lock-down, an Emergency Family Income (IFE) was given to households with no pension or formal labour income between April and September 2020. The benefit was praised for its role in reducing poverty and providing for millions of households that had lost their income, but it was discontinued after September 2020 when most of the COVID19 restrictions had been lifted. In this paper, we run counter-factual dynamic simulations of what would have been the cost and distributive impact of maintaining the IFE after September 2020, and making it a permanent benefit. We show this would have represented initially a yearly additional expenditure of nearly 1.5% of GDP, with a downward trend. This is comparable to the cost of all family benefits. We also estimate that a permanent IFE would have significantly reduced income inequality. We thus show a permanent IFE would be financially feasible, although whether it is desirable or how it should be funded is open to debate. © 2021, Calcagno.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Microsimulation
International Journal of Microsimulation Mathematics-Modeling and Simulation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IJM covers research in all aspects of microsimulation modelling. It publishes high quality contributions making use of microsimulation models to address specific research questions in all scientific areas, as well as methodological and technical issues. IJM concern: the description, validation, benchmarking and replication of microsimulation models; results coming from microsimulation models, in particular policy evaluation and counterfactual analysis; technical or methodological aspect of microsimulation modelling; reviews of models and results, as well as of technical or methodological issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信