基于供需不匹配,使用改进的3SFCA方法评估中国上海大都市绿地多式联运可达性的不公平性

IF 10.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Huilin Liang, Qi Yan, Yujia Yan, Qingping Zhang
{"title":"基于供需不匹配,使用改进的3SFCA方法评估中国上海大都市绿地多式联运可达性的不公平性","authors":"Huilin Liang,&nbsp;Qi Yan,&nbsp;Yujia Yan,&nbsp;Qingping Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2023.104456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The problem that limited green spaces do not meet the increasingly demands of people living in urbanized areas is a global concerning. This study employed an improved 3SFCA<span> method to estimate urban green space accessibility (UGSA) for residents in Shanghai based on walking, cycling, driving and public transport<span> travel modes. It also integrated the Gini index and multiple spatial autocorrelations to evaluate the inequity and spatial disparity associated with UGSA from demand, supply and demand-supply-relationship aspects. An importance-performance analysis was conducted to identify improvement priorities for communities. The findings showed that UGSA in Shanghai was clearly unequal. Higher speed travel modes, such as driving, led to better and more equal UGSA than lower speed modes, such as walking. Old towns were generally more equal than built-up districts. The communities with worse and better UGSA supply results were mainly located in and out of the central city areas, respectively. The population demand index showed that communities with a high-supply-low-demand UGSA mismatch and a high-supply-high-demand UGSA match were in urgent and sub-urgent need of UGSA improvements, respectively, and that they were mainly clustered in the central city area. These clusters were very different to the results based on the population variable.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104456"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using an improved 3SFCA method to assess inequities associated with multimodal accessibility to green spaces based on mismatches between supply and demand in the metropolitan of Shanghai, China\",\"authors\":\"Huilin Liang,&nbsp;Qi Yan,&nbsp;Yujia Yan,&nbsp;Qingping Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2023.104456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The problem that limited green spaces do not meet the increasingly demands of people living in urbanized areas is a global concerning. This study employed an improved 3SFCA<span> method to estimate urban green space accessibility (UGSA) for residents in Shanghai based on walking, cycling, driving and public transport<span> travel modes. It also integrated the Gini index and multiple spatial autocorrelations to evaluate the inequity and spatial disparity associated with UGSA from demand, supply and demand-supply-relationship aspects. An importance-performance analysis was conducted to identify improvement priorities for communities. The findings showed that UGSA in Shanghai was clearly unequal. Higher speed travel modes, such as driving, led to better and more equal UGSA than lower speed modes, such as walking. Old towns were generally more equal than built-up districts. The communities with worse and better UGSA supply results were mainly located in and out of the central city areas, respectively. The population demand index showed that communities with a high-supply-low-demand UGSA mismatch and a high-supply-high-demand UGSA match were in urgent and sub-urgent need of UGSA improvements, respectively, and that they were mainly clustered in the central city area. These clusters were very different to the results based on the population variable.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670723000677\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670723000677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

有限的绿地空间不能满足城市化地区人们日益增长的需求,这是一个全球性的问题。本研究采用改进的3SFCA方法,基于步行、骑行、自驾和公共交通四种出行方式估算上海市居民城市绿地可达性。结合基尼指数和多个空间自相关性,从需求、供给和供需关系三个方面对与UGSA相关的不平等和空间差异进行了评价。进行了重要性-绩效分析,以确定社区的改进优先级。研究结果表明,上海大学本科教育发展不平等现象明显。高速的出行方式,比如开车,比低速的出行方式,比如走路,能产生更好更平等的UGSA。老城区通常比建成区更平等。UGSA供应效果较差和较好的社区分别主要位于中心城区和中心城区外。人口需求指数表明,高供给-低需求UGSA匹配和高供给-高需求UGSA匹配的社区UGSA改善需求分别处于紧急和次紧急状态,且主要集中在中心城区。这些聚类与基于总体变量的结果非常不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using an improved 3SFCA method to assess inequities associated with multimodal accessibility to green spaces based on mismatches between supply and demand in the metropolitan of Shanghai, China

The problem that limited green spaces do not meet the increasingly demands of people living in urbanized areas is a global concerning. This study employed an improved 3SFCA method to estimate urban green space accessibility (UGSA) for residents in Shanghai based on walking, cycling, driving and public transport travel modes. It also integrated the Gini index and multiple spatial autocorrelations to evaluate the inequity and spatial disparity associated with UGSA from demand, supply and demand-supply-relationship aspects. An importance-performance analysis was conducted to identify improvement priorities for communities. The findings showed that UGSA in Shanghai was clearly unequal. Higher speed travel modes, such as driving, led to better and more equal UGSA than lower speed modes, such as walking. Old towns were generally more equal than built-up districts. The communities with worse and better UGSA supply results were mainly located in and out of the central city areas, respectively. The population demand index showed that communities with a high-supply-low-demand UGSA mismatch and a high-supply-high-demand UGSA match were in urgent and sub-urgent need of UGSA improvements, respectively, and that they were mainly clustered in the central city area. These clusters were very different to the results based on the population variable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信